Dude shaming his landlord on social media for illegally accessing his stimulus check records was actually going after his own grandma

[duped_samaritan]

You got any peer reviewed science journals to back up your claim that being ok with transgender people is 'anti-science'?

I don't think you do. I think you're confusing feelings, beliefs and instincts with science.

Um, I'm not talking about being "ok with transgender people".

I'm actually okay with transgender people, as are many on the right. Real transgender people. Like ones who actually get on hormones long-term and make every effort to appear and live as the other gender. Not delicate flowers like "Amber" who look and act male, yet adopt a female identity because they think it's cool or edgy.

I'm also not okay with transgender people of any type in women's athletics. Opposing that view is definitely anti-science, and if you think otherwise, lol @ you.

I'm willing to make these bets about the majority in any left-leaning social media space being FOR these wacky concepts, just to prove that I'm not attacking a tiny lunatic fringe which is separate from the mainstream left.

What's up with this statement then?

Also who wants to bet me that if we find a left-leaning Facebook group chosen at random by a neutral third party, and posted the voting question of, "Should we treat Amber Pearl Saintly as female and allow her to be in women's jail/prison?" (see post #3 above), that 51% or more will vote YES? I'll take the 51%+ YES side, and you will take 49% or more will vote NO. Any takers?

Then we can do the same in a right-leaning Facebook group, and I'll make the same bet that 90% or more will vote NO.

So remind me... which party is anti-science?

What does this have to do with science?