Dude shaming his landlord on social media for illegally accessing his stimulus check records was actually going after his own grandma

[Dan Druff]

I'm not talking about the occasional "idiot nobody". I'm talking about the general attitude of mainstream people in the party.

That's why I keep offering the bet that we can post a question about "Amber Sainty" in post #3 in an arbitrarily-chosen left-leaning Facebook group. If fewer than 51% vote Amber should be considered a woman, I'll lose the bet.

Yet no one will take me up on it.

Why?

Because everyone here knows that the majority of Democrats are now all aboard for this insanity. Not all, but the majority.

This is why I laugh at the haughty "anti-science" accusations from those on the left, as if they are the rational, superior intellectuals who utilize science to make their decisions. They aren't interested in even addressing the anti-science crap going on in their own party. Instead they obsess over Trump.

You got any peer reviewed science journals to back up your claim that being ok with transgender people is 'anti-science'?

I don't think you do. I think you're confusing feelings, beliefs and instincts with science.

Um, I'm not talking about being "ok with transgender people".

I'm actually okay with transgender people, as are many on the right. Real transgender people. Like ones who actually get on hormones long-term and make every effort to appear and live as the other gender. Not delicate flowers like "Amber" who look and act male, yet adopt a female identity because they think it's cool or edgy.

I'm also not okay with transgender people of any type in women's athletics. Opposing that view is definitely anti-science, and if you think otherwise, lol @ you.

I'm willing to make these bets about the majority in any left-leaning social media space being FOR these wacky concepts, just to prove that I'm not attacking a tiny lunatic fringe which is separate from the mainstream left.