Originally Posted by
Baron Von Strucker
I dont think this is a bad idea of there was a armed guard at sandy hook this stOry would be different
Your rather short sighted perspective notwithstanding, you are giving literally no weight whatsoever to the traumatic effect seeing an armed guard on a daily basis would have on the children in question.
Now seems a good time to point out the glaring logical flaw in your statement-you presume on the day of the shooting if a surprise guard was standing there (who had never been there before, as we can assume the shooter scoped out his target with at least enough foresight to see if the there were any major roadblocks in his way, such as armed guards at the entrance) the shooter would have been deterred.
Yeah, and shot up a different school, or library, or crowded bus depot, or the movie theatre etc.
Armed guard at the school long term is the solution mike
So the guy has to pick a non-school target, big deal.
So the crazy people have to use bombs or poison gas or throwing knives or set fires etc. You are missing the point at every opportunity, it's unreal. SINCE WHEN DO BANS CONTROL THE SUBSTANCE BANNED? HAS THE WAR ON DRUGS ERADICATED DRUG USE ON THE STREET? HELL FUCKING NO, SO WHY WOULD YOU EXPECT GUNS TO BE ANY DIFFERENT?
MEANING ALL YOU WILL END UP WITH IS A CRIMINAL ELEMENT WITH ALL THE FIREPOWER AND YOU HAVING NOTHING BUT A CORN COB PRESSED FIRMLY AGAINST YOUR PROSTATE.
Here's an idea I swear you will love and it would work too, perfectly- at the center of the school is a small tactical nuclear warhead. Attached to every child is a heart rate monitor. If any of these flatlines
THE WHOLE PLACE GOES!