Originally Posted by Kalam
At this point the left wing propaganda machine is putting so much effort into pumping "There is no CRT" narrative, I am starting to believe it is actually much more prevalent and serious than I previously thought. We live in a pretty liberal area. I'll definitely try to be more cognizant moving forward what they are teaching my kids.
In other words:
To be fair, my son likes to parrot shit he learns in class and the only "WTF" moment we had last year was when he informed me that he learned some black guy was the first guy to reach the North Pole, but they gave the credit to a white guy because he is white. I mean that is a pretty LOL thing to be teaching 9 year olds, but at this point I should probably be happy if that is as bad as it got.
And in fact, this is the general Democratic playbook recently. They push something extreme, conservatives react to it, and then they suddenly walk it back, claiming that conservatives misunderstood and are just engaging in political fear-mongering.
The latest trick has been teaching CRT, and then denying it's actually CRT, and pointing out some subtle differences in the school curriculum CRT and the original version of CRT. Then conservatives are accused of panicking over CRT being taught, when it's "not actually happening".
The whole thing is so dishonest.
I'll break it down very simply.
Lessons built around CRT are being taught in some schools in the US, both public and private. These are also being taught in some workplaces.
Conservatives do not want CRT -- or anything similar to it -- being taught in public schools. They are taking steps to prevent it from happening.
The left is attempting to turn this back around on conservatives by claiming that this concern is "dog whistling" and "propaganda".
So okay... I'll ask you this, Mumbles (and anyone else currently criticizing the right for this):
Should CRT or anything resembling CRT be taught in schools?
Reply With Quote