
Originally Posted by
Dan Druff
Your reading comprehension is terrible, too.
I presented the Michael McDonald pro-riot tweet because:
1) My debate with him and some of his followers on Twitter was already mentioned earlier in this thread.
2) McDonald himself said that he was shocked that he got such overwhelmingly positive response to his pro-riot tweet, to the point where he joked that perhaps he wasn't being controversial enough.
3) McDonald is not even a extreme leftist. His brand of thought is common among a lot of Democrats today, which is why the response he got to being pro-riots was so overwhelmingly positive.
So I presented you REAL EVIDENCE of how I wasn't arguing with a strawman, and that many people have positive views about the riots. Rather than admitting you were wrong, you claimed that I just "fished out" a pro-riot tweet from a well-followed poker figure which just happened to have tons of pro-riot responses.
All a strawman, though, right?
Learn some critical thinking skills, bro.