1) He was "a three-better". There is a good chance he would have 3-bet the flop with AQ suited to isolate the orig raiser.
2) Bowker gave no indication that this guy was a donkey.
3) This was *the* WSOP Main Event, not some $10 -- or even a $100 -- online tourney that young hotshots are likely to play with reckless abandon and rinse and repeat if they donk off being overly aggressive with n-th best hands on the river (with n > 8) against the in-position river bettor.
4) Bowker's lead out river bet was large enough to indicate that he was pot committed. Raising all-in while giving Bowker 4-1 on his money -- and when Bowker wouldn't be crippled if he called and lost -- would have been an utterly stupid desperation move by the kid if he held the nut flush. In fact, if he was so reckless/aggresive, he would likely have raised all-in on the turn, where he had more fold equity. Especially when Bowker disguised the ridic strength of his hand by betting out.
5) If the "kid" had been a much older guy (say, my age), and frustrated by events up to that point, there is good chance he would donked off his chips on the river with such a bet with only the nut flush in a vain attempt to "make a move against that punk poker pro Bowker!"
6) If the "kid" had been Jacylin Moskow, it is almost GUAR-RAN-TEED that she would have make such a donkey move with the 9th best hand in that case. (At least as evidenced by her showing in that PNIA hand that she tried to get quashed.)






Reply With Quote
