
Originally Posted by
Serial Fail
So you have been ranting and raving about the "exact wording" of this bet and, now that Vegas has proven that the quotes you keep throwing out don't apply to the bet, you refuse to follow the exact wording of the bet?
Riddle me this moron. Say we entered into this bet and there was never any discussion whatsoever about impartial arbitors. Then we get through it and there is a disagreement about the outcome. How is that typically settled? WITH ARBITORS! So if Vegas wants to
incorrectly think the arbitors dont apply to governing this bet simply because I said "usages" then we still have to settle the dispute about if it was supposed to be one or multiple misuses. In the gambling world as well as the real world, when there are disputes, it is very common for an impartial outside party to resolve that issue. If you dont understand that, then than thou though that this clippity clop hip hop bing bang boom biatch. Maybe that made sense to you?