Quote Originally Posted by SrslySirius View Post
Quote Originally Posted by BeerAndPoker View Post
Tie breakers early on aren't as much of a deal but when it's who makes the finals a tie shouldn't just advance someone which I assume it's either by random draw or whoever hit the vote number first. I like both them guys but just saying.
The whole thing has been kind of a mess, to be honest. For various reasons.

One of those reasons being that very few people are bothering to go to Bracket Geek. I propose that we do this on PFA next time, using multiple choice polls. You can have 10 options per poll, so 4 threads should suffice for the first round. There's no harm in using checkboxes, because if someone votes for 2 people that are up against each other, then those votes cancel each other out.

EDIT: We could also make the polls public, adding an element of drama and making it possible to void votes by dupe accounts.
Horrible idea. Bracketgeek is perfect for what we need. It just needs to be tweaked some. Easier access is the most important thing. We need more voters. The contest took an entire week to culminate the way it was set up. That's perfect. If you want to run a multiple choice poll for best/worst that's great however I will continue to use bracket geek. Half the fun is seeing who you match up against. I do agree that next time I will seed by rep instead of alphabetically and there may not be quite as many entrants. It would be nice if at least 50 people voted though.