jsearles and Chinamaniac debate about the value of his WSOP pieces

[Steve-O]

"used those two" is a lot closer to an interpretation of both then it is to either

Not when you consider all of the other posts; you can't use that single sentence and throw away everything before and after it. This isn't a signed contract so intent is very important. When viewed as a whole it's crystal clear what the bet was for. What your trying to say is more like someone agreeing to sell a car and the next day they come to your house and take it, saying, "well I said you could buy my car for $10,000, but we never agreed on how long this is for. It was only for a day."

Congratulations folks, you are now reading the most replied to thread in PFA history!

Steve, I agree that intent is of the utmost importance. I intend/ed to win a bet regarding if Vegas could find posts containing misuses of "those two words."

You analogy is again poor. Please respond to my analogy. If you offered me $100 and told me to get a picture of "those two having sex" isnt it implied that you mean together? When you use a phrase such as that you cant then later seperate the two.

If that is the only statement than either interpretation is correct, but with 15 posts before it clarifying what the spirit of the wager is than it would be clear.

I tried to see if a day in between would have you come to your senses, but since it hasn't (and you ared still somehow making the claim you won the bet) I'll once again bow out of the conversation, since I'm making more progress debating my desk.

You continue to make the salacious 15 posts before claim and that is simply a fabrication. There were 3 total posts discussing the bet before Vegas made his now infamous offer. Just because there are other posts in this thread, they literally had nothing to do with this bet.

Sorry if I was hyperbolic, but one post or 5,000, the intent was there. Fin