Quote Originally Posted by VaughnP View Post
Quote Originally Posted by VaughnP View Post
Forgive me if this has already been brought up in thread, I haven't read it yet, but no one finds it a bit odd that both campaign managers were in ways connected at the hip? And that they both have shady connections back to Russia? Doesn't it seem like given what else we know that the Russians actually had already infiltrated the Obama administration with direct Clinton connections and that it was Clinton's campaign that was actually compromised from the start? The Uranium One thing isn't a nonstory however badly some of you want it to be. The Podesta group represented Uranium One, and I think that is just touching the surface, considering that they also represented Sberbank, I actually think still do. Skerbank is another name for Bank of the Kremlin. Irony.

I came across this post from 2017 looking for something else. Still remarkable how the Podesta thing was swept under the rug. Two weeks after this post the Podesta Group closed. Democrats always accuse the opposition of what they are guilty of. Given what has happened with Ukraine since then, it's even more interesting. They were heavily involved with various pro-Russinan groups and individuals in Ukraine. People like to to pretend that John Podesta was somehow separate from his brother and the firm he originally started, not that he simply took a different role, it's ridiculous.

oh wow a maga accusing the democrats of projection.

didnt see that coming.