Originally Posted by Anal_Hershiser
Jim Harbaugh can go choke on a dick.
That was more of a wish than anything. Like I said, Seattle teams combined probably have a good 85%-90% winning percentage when I am in attendance. It's a running joke in our family. We had a streak of like 13 winning Mariners games going. They were down like 6-3 in the 7th and we were discussing the death of our streak. Then there was a 5.4 earthquake, and the game was postponed. Most of the time they weren't even close games. 9-1, 7-2, 8-3. For some awful reason, I'm the Seattle sports franchises lucky rabbits foot.
Last edited by Anal_Hershiser; 12-27-2012 at 09:49 PM.
No fine for Chancellor, it was a clean hit.Kam Chancellor was flagged for unnecessary roughness on this play.
Thoughts?
Bad call by three referees. If they can't make the right call due to the speed of the play then it needs to be reviewable.
There will never, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever be reviewing of officials in game so the entire world can see how incompetent they are on a weekly basis.No fine for Chancellor, it was a clean hit.Kam Chancellor was flagged for unnecessary roughness on this play.
Thoughts?
Bad call by three referees. If they can't make the right call due to the speed of the play then it needs to be reviewable.
That will be kept behind closed doors, where it can be covered up in an attempt to fool the public into thinking they get 99.9% of the calls right.
They are the best!!
The lack of a fine doesn't make it a bad call. It just means that it didn't warrant a fine.
Davis is still not cleared to play.
Correct. It stands as a bad call all on its own merits.
The penalty was for launching. If he was deemed to have launched then he would have been fined. The fact that he wasn't fined means that the NFL reviewed the play and came to the conclusion that he didn't launch. If he didn't launch there shouldn't have been a flag.The lack of a fine doesn't make it a bad call. It just means that it didn't warrant a fine.
Davis is still not cleared to play.
The fact that Davis isn't cleared to play is unfortunate, but completely irrelevant.
Edit - How hard does Chancellor hit if he can give Vernon Davis a concussion without hitting him in the head??
Last edited by tony bagadonuts; 12-28-2012 at 07:58 PM.
Seahawks Arizona presently -11 -110
I'm on this
Say what?
What don't you get?Say what?
Seahawks Arizona?What don't you get?
Are they playing?
SF is -16.5 vs Arizona.
Seattle is -10.5 vs the Rams.
What the fuck are you talking about?
Sorry bro meant RamsSeahawks Arizona?
Are they playing?
SF is -16.5 vs Arizona.
Seattle is -10.5 vs the Rams.
What the fuck are you talking about?
What don't you get?
LOL, I missed that the first time.Sorry bro meant Rams
Last word on Chancellor.
Chancellor not fined for textbook tackle
Posted by Darin Gantt on December 28, 2012, 5:16 PM EST
AP
Every week, there are fines that are debatable.
But this week, the absence of a fine for Seahawks safety Kam Chancellor might have been the easiest call of the week.
As expected, Chancellor was not punished for the hit that knocked 49ers tight end Vernon Davis out of last week’s game.
Frankly, it was the kind of clean, hard shot that ought to be distributed as a teaching tool, to players and officials. Chancellor put a shoulder pad to Davis’ chest, and separated the ball from Davis in the process.
Other players and coaches whine when they got docked for leading with their heads or hitting players late, saying the rules have made the game less physical.
By not fining Chancellor for a hit that was flagged on the field (because officials have been conditioned to call anything that’s close), the league has shown there is still room for big hits.
If Darin Gantt says it's a textbook clean, that's that. End of discussion.
Now you are just being willfully obtuse.If Darin Gantt says it's a textbook clean, that's that. End of discussion.
I honestly don't understand the point of that post. It's some random nobody sports columnist saying the same thing you just said. You seem to have posted it as a "ha ha, see...I'm right".Now you are just being willfully obtuse.
I agree the lack of a fine doesnt make it a bad call, but it was a bad call in this case.The lack of a fine doesn't make it a bad call. It just means that it didn't warrant a fine.
Davis is still not cleared to play.
Davis being hurt should be irrelevant, but lets be honest if that was deemed a dirty hit the fine would probably be higher if the guy gets injured from it.
In this case that fact that Davis was hurt and the league didnt fine him makes it an even more obvious bad call by the officials.
As far as reviews it will never happen the games will take forever not to mention its still a judgement call.
As a Packer fan I know first hand that reviews arent always going to make a bad call a good one. If that were the case the Seahawks would need a win this week to be in the playoffs, and GB would have the 2 locked up with a chance at the 1 seed.
I don't understand why you keep poking the issue. Do you think it was illegal, or worthy of a fine? There's pretty much near-unanimous opinions that this was a clean hit, and if you slow down the gif, he clearly did not launch, as part of the definition of "launching" includes leaving the ground AND leading with the helmet, neither of which happened here.I honestly don't understand the point of that post. It's some random nobody sports columnist saying the same thing you just said. You seem to have posted it as a "ha ha, see...I'm right".
So you just stirring the pot, B? If not, what are you trying to say?
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Reply With Quote
