Hella mad. Fuming and on permanent tilt.
The study you linked that's being retweeted by retards proves very little about anything. Most of it is about it's authors.
You would have to look at the supplementary material to find the infections per 100k in different counties compared to their vaccination rate. It shows strong correlation between low infection numbers and high vaccination numbers. They for whatever reason didn't draw that conclusion from their own material.
For counties they used 1 weeks numbers compared to previous weeks numbers and then tried to correlate increase of cases to vaccination rates. I don't expect you to understand why it's retarded. So i will provide an easy to understand example...
Say if you were suck to 19 cocks this week and 20 cocks in the previous week, the study would conclude that you are not a cocksucker because there was no increase in your weekly cock consumption. As we all know you're a humongous faggot. The easiest way is to merely calculate how many cocks you sucked on an average week. In this case it would 19,5 cocks per week from an extensive 2 week sample. The increase or decrease of cocks is completely irrelevant.
...you're welcome.
IMO you should be a little worried about getting your wish. The Republican Party might be populated by a bunch of criminals that prey mainly on their own low-information constituency. But the progressive wing of the Democratic Party has some very bad ideas (IMO) about how societies should function, and are pushing us towards a potential dystopian nightmare.
CNN with more front-page scare pieces.
'Virginia family is trying to process how their healthy 10-year-old daughter died from Covid in five days': https://www.cnn.com/2021/10/04/us/va...rnd/index.html
Keep in mind that this is an extreme outlier. Almost no healthy kids that age are dying from COVID.
Why didn't we see CNN covering similar stories about the flu in the late 2010s? There were 188 confirmed pediatric flu deaths in the 2018-19 season, but the CDC estimated that it was severely undercounted due to kids with preexisting conditions who died after a bout with the flu, and they estimate almost 500 kids died related to flu in 2018-19. This was very lightly covered at the time, and there was not a push at all for any kind of mask mandates in 2019 (even though cloth masks are significantly MORE helpful against the flu than they are against COVID).
In this long scare piece, CNN does not bother to mention once that there have been fewer than 500 COVID deaths in the under-18 age group, out of about 75 million kids that age. They also don't bother to mention that kids make up about 23% of the population, yet account for just 0.06% of COVID deaths. They also don't bother to mention that COVID is roughly comparable to the flu in its overall danger to young children.
IT'S COMING FOR THE KIDZ, Y'ALL
Very unbiased and factual reporting from the mainstream media, as usual.
There is no pic of dead fat kid, guarantee obese, the parents were abusive allowing her to balloon so big like themselves.
Freedom is never more than one generation away from extinction. We didn't pass it to our children in the bloodstream. It must be fought for, protected, and handed on for them to do the same.
Ronald Reagan
Here is the picture of the girl who died:
She was overweight, but not to the extent to where it should have created a COVID danger. The overweight factor has a lot to do with killing younger and middle-aged adults, but not kids. With kids, it's almost always preexisting conditions.
I think the girl just ran really bad and was one of the super unlucky kids to die from this. Her pattern of death from COVID was also atypical, as she went from symptomatic to dead within 5 days. Typically COVID deaths take a minimum of 2 weeks from first being symptomatic, and often longer. It is likely she had something else going on which wasn't known or diagnosed at that point.
In any case, CNN shouldn't be exploiting this death in order to create a fear narrative regarding kids. That only leads to harming children by placing needless restrictions upon them, which in turn harms social development and brings upon anxiety/depression issues.
Likely blood clots. Genetic predisposition + Covid-19. Occasionally happens with asymptomatic cases. Still a rare x rare type of event.
Slightly older kids are more common with MIS-C (multisystem inflammatory syndrome) to have thrombotic events. MIS-C is something kids started getting around the time cov2 came around. It's not really asymptomatic though.
In case you're wondering it's still far more common than blood clots related to vaccines.
671 public workers in Connecticut refused covid shot and are on unpaid leave. Fighting the good fight wonder if getting unemployment benefits, I would guess no.
Last edited by FRANKRIZZO; 10-08-2021 at 01:57 PM.
Another terrible and misleading COVID article by CNN:
Headline:
Children Face Similar Risk of COVID Infeciton as Adults, Study Suggests
That headline was deliberately written to appear that kids were at a similar risk level from COVID, while at the same time giving them the out that it's technically factual (since kids have a similar risk to get infected by COVID, though not a similar risk from it).
The article does briefly mention that kids are far more likely to be asymptomatic than adults, but of course it doesn't discuss the exponentially lower death rate compared to adults. The death rate is never disclosed on CNN because it goes against the panic narrative they've been trying to present for 20 months.
Also, the article skips a very important factor in the school vaccine/masking debate: Do kids TRANSMIT COVID at a high rate?
Included is a single quote saying, "The fact that children, and especially young children, can transmit SARS-CoV-2 is now established and more clearly understood", but they don't expand upon it. Why? Because it is increasingly believed that kids transmit COVID at a MUCH lower rate than adults, making all of the mandatory masking virtually useless (and in fact harmful).
Just a horrible article all around. It gives no new information, and just incites panic.
Peak CNN.
Fairly sure it's in the headline. Considering that was something that was speculated to be much lesser.
Couldn't really care less about the article not covering things that weren't in the study it was based on. Every article doesn't cover everything related to the subject.
Maybe focus on bitching about what's in the article and not what isn't in it.
So you think that headline was honestly drawn up, without any attempt to mislead?
Was it a coincidence that the word "death" (or anything about death) wasn't mentioned once, in an article supposedly about COVID danger faced by kids?
Was it a coincidence that they devoted just one sentence to the transmissibility by kids, and that one sentence omitted any mention of the likelihood that they are transmitting at a much lesser rate?
Look, we can have radically different opinions on COVID issues and COVID policy, but we're not going to get anywhere here if you can't be honest about the horrible bias being displayed in articles like these.
There are currently 9 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 9 guests)