Quote Originally Posted by Dan Druff View Post
You guys are making too much of the attorney's fees thing. It is very standard for a court to only award a percentage of requested fees. It's also important to remember that some of these fees were related to the repeated delays requested by Postle, and that we also proposed early on to be dropped out of the case (while agreeing to waive all fees in return), and he refused. We did everything we could to get this done quickly and minimize the fees.

I am now very curious to see what they do about Veronica's request next week, as her fees (for a very similar case & motion) were something like $78,000.

It is not official until tomorrow, when the actual hearing takes place. However, the PDF Eric posted is from the judge herself, so it's unlikely she will deviate much from it at this point.

This is looking pretty much over (aside from the collection process), and I thank Eric for his excellent work on the matter.

You are probably right about the attorneys fees and making too much out of it but it is a curiosity as I do not really understand the legal framework, however, based on the PDF it does seem hostile towards the defence and lawyer representing ( Eric ), is this standard ?

Now this is coming to an end what have you achieved above and beyond what everyone who did nothing achieved ? On the face of it it seems that you have occurred additional costs compared to those who did not aggressively attack this with no upside , what were the benefits in the pro active approach that you took ?