*** Official Republican CIVIL WAR Thread ***

[BartHanson]

There probably isn’t a single person in this country that is against maintaining the integrity of fair elections. However, there is no evidence of significant voter fraud that warrants the measures that are being proposed especially if it disproportionality disenfranchises specific socioeconomic and racial groups. Just because the NEO GOP says that there is “voter fraud” doesn’t make it true. They have never provided any significant evidence supporting their claims.

So if Democrats hammer advertisements everywhere that they're going to be at polling places handing out food and water to people in line to vote, you think that's okay?

Because there's obviously some very big problems with that.

I'm posting this again because it got buried in a Sydney Powell thread, and I'm unsure if you read it:

Druff, this is the thing I don’t get about you. I’m going to assume that you are in favor of democracy even if you don’t agree with party in power (correct me if my assumption is wrong).

Whereas its patently obvious that a significant portion of the GOP would rather stay in power and have their policies in place at all costs regardless if they lost a democratically held election. But you continue to support the GOP because you agree with their policies. So which is more important, the policies or the democracy? Do you favor a more autocratic type system if the people in power are more aligned with your political beliefs?

A good parallel would be if the GOP suddenly wanted to throw all of the jews out of the country. You would agree with them on almost all their policies, except the jewish exile, so would this be a disqualifying ideal for you to stop supporting the GOP? How is this any different from agreeing with all of the GOPs policies accept them not upholding democratically held elections?

And don’t kid yourself if you think that my premise is a flawed. Most of the entire GOP house were willing to throw out the results of the election.