Quote Originally Posted by gimmick View Post
Quote Originally Posted by Dan Druff View Post


If it's not political in nature, how come we don't have random rioting/looting/arson outbreaks when there isn't a leftist cause behind it?
Looting since the beginning of time has been associated with any chaotic event that caused enough disturbance. Opportunity. You're just so self centered and ignorant to even try understanding it. Americans didn't invent looting. It's been around for a while.

You think looting in London during WWII air raids was political in nature? Or hundred other examples that you don't seem to be aware of.

A random glimpse to history times...

https://www.warhistoryonline.com/ins...ome-front.html

"One of the most common crimes was looting. When a building was damaged or destroyed during bombing raids, looters would steal what they could. Both homes and shops were targets. People would come home to find that not only had their home been destroyed, but also that their possessions had been stolen. The loot may have been sold or kept by the individuals."

...Anteeeeeeeeeeefa obv.
Except it's not just looting.

The 1994 Northridge Earthquake (Los Angeles) had some looting following it. It didn't have any rioting, arson, or violence. Notice how it differed from the LA Riots two years earlier, which did have rioting/arson/violence.

Were this only looting, you'd have a point. However, it isn't. It's a full scale of violent protest combined with looting. In fact, some places like Portland have relatively little looting, but tons of violence/arson/vandalism.

Simply put, you're full of shit when you make this comparison.