They might cry about it for a second, but will quickly pivot to praying that Biden's heart and brain hold up for 4 more years to avoid President Kamala.Originally Posted by duped_samaritan
At least if the Republicans lose, we know they won't try and blame anyone else or cry about how unfair it is.
Dem led cities aren't shutting down a week early to board up their storefronts due to the fear of Trump voters coming to town.
I don’t know what you mean by this? I just quoted Druff because it was on topic. Lie might be too strong, but I was reading everything back then, so nothing Druff posted influenced my thinking whatsoever on this subjectNice job Druff. It worked on BCR.
I also don’t agree with his take on Trumps handling of this virus in any way or the idea we get the same results under any administration.
I saw the statement you posted where it gives greater context to his earlier comments. I was aware of that back when it happened.
I knew PPE was short. I also recall initially that before Fauci was in the inner circle, many in the medical world were really pushing Trump to add him to the inner circle because he was so respected. I recall thinking that Fauci was kind of saying the right things to get added to the team imo.
For example. I remember back when Fauci was saying things along the lines of, “at the moment, the flu presents a much bigger risk.” I put it in quotes but I’m going from memory. He said many similar things like that. Sometimes he’d follow it up with some clarifying statement, sometimes not.
That was factually true at the time. That’s sound science. But it also was music to Trumps ear. It kind of ignored the fact that while thats true right now, we can ballpark how much risk the flu will be going forward within some range, while this thing is a whole different beast.
Most of us who were following it closely were far more alarmist than him.
So when I say lie or swamp, thats probably too harsh. I like him. I think he’s a good guy. I also think he emphasized things in such a way that he thought would get him in the room.
If he had phrased things in such a way early like.” the flu presents a bigger problem this week or month, but this virus if it spreads could potentially kill millions”, then I don’t think he gets into the room to help guide decisions.
There was this brief time early where he was very cautious in his statements, at least that I saw, in such a way that would appeal to Trump. We ended up locking things down. Trump did go from it will disappear to taking it seriously for a brief time, so maybe it was an effective approach?
I just don’t think you can have that position he has has occupied without being a bit of a political animal yourself, and I saw shades of that early imo, and was a little put off by it back then. We are talking a matter of weeks. Feb-March, people went from kind of cautious statements to the upmost serious statements very quickly.
I guess I would ask you, if we had a different President, do you think he makes more serious warning statements earlier? I think he would have. I think he would have spoke more freely imo. If I believe that, then I think he was playing politics. I believed it then. I still take his word 100 times out of a 100 over Trumps.
Duped is brainwashed thus can't think for himself. He will defend anyone from his side of the aisle to the death before admitting any wrong doing. He's the exact same person as the diehard Trump supporters, he just has different political views.I don’t know what you mean by this? I just quoted Druff because it was on topic. Lie might be too strong, but I was reading everything back then, so nothing Druff posted influenced my thinking whatsoever on this subject
I also don’t agree with his take on Trumps handling of this virus in any way or the idea we get the same results under any administration.
I saw the statement you posted where it gives greater context to his earlier comments. I was aware of that back when it happened.
I knew PPE was short. I also recall initially that before Fauci was in the inner circle, many in the medical world were really pushing Trump to add him to the inner circle because he was so respected. I recall thinking that Fauci was kind of saying the right things to get added to the team imo.
For example. I remember back when Fauci was saying things along the lines of, “at the moment, the flu presents a much bigger risk.” I put it in quotes but I’m going from memory. He said many similar things like that. Sometimes he’d follow it up with some clarifying statement, sometimes not.
That was factually true at the time. That’s sound science. But it also was music to Trumps ear. It kind of ignored the fact that while thats true right now, we can ballpark how much risk the flu will be going forward within some range, while this thing is a whole different beast.
Most of us who were following it closely were far more alarmist than him.
So when I say lie or swamp, thats probably too harsh. I like him. I think he’s a good guy. I also think he emphasized things in such a way that he thought would get him in the room.
If he had phrased things in such a way early like.” the flu presents a bigger problem this week or month, but this virus if it spreads could potentially kill millions”, then I don’t think he gets into the room to help guide decisions.
There was this brief time early where he was very cautious in his statements, at least that I saw, in such a way that would appeal to Trump. We ended up locking things down. Trump did go from it will disappear to taking it seriously for a brief time, so maybe it was an effective approach?
I just don’t think you can have that position he has has occupied without being a bit of a political animal yourself, and I saw shades of that early imo, and was a little put off by it back then. We are talking a matter of weeks. Feb-March, people went from kind of cautious statements to the upmost serious statements very quickly.
I guess I would ask you, if we had a different President, do you think he makes more serious warning statements earlier? I think he would have. I think he would have spoke more freely imo. If I believe that, then I think he was playing politics. I believed it then. I still take his word 100 times out of a 100 over Trumps.
this is pretty much reality libtards, prepare yourself for the sequel
https://twitter.com/twt/status/1323316150294450178
This isn’t all that bold. If you asked your average person on the street barely paying attention which states Biden needed to win, they’d sat the rust belt states Hillary barely lost. Only those looking at shit close would make an argument for places like Georgia or Texas being possible Biden wins. People associate those as red states.
This isn’t all that bold. If you asked your average person on the street barely paying attention which states Biden needed to win, they’d sat the rust belt states Hillary barely lost. Only those looking at shit close would make an argument for places like Georgia or Texas being possible Biden wins. People associate those as red states.
you're right it isn't that bold, it can be done quite easily
most gamblers know whats up
https://twitter.com/twt/status/1323294561079304192
By ALL THE MIDWEST States, he must mean WI, MI and MN.
Biden would need to win 2/3 of them in crowders scenario.
Not sure what to make of this.
you're right it isn't that bold, it can be done quite easily
most gamblers know whats up
https://twitter.com/twt/status/1323294561079304192
Do Republicans disproportionately play DF more compared to Dems?
Men, especially 30-40 year old white men, tend to favor Trump. So there's surely a lot of overlap.
my mile high read is 4chan found out it wasnt validating ips and went apeshit.
"Birds born in a cage think flying is an illness." - Alejandro Jodorowsky
"America is not so much a nightmare as a non-dream. The American non-dream is precisely a move to wipe the dream out of existence. The dream is a spontaneous happening and therefore dangerous to a control system set up by the non-dreamers." -- William S. Burroughs
Democratic party is so out of touch they are running the same Lady Gaga election eve concert they did in 2016.
Kamala comes out in favor of socialism 2 days before the campaign.
Governor Whitmer orders restaurants to track all restaurant diners, starting the day before the election.
Philly burns down PA over a felon who got himself shot, charging at cops with a knife.
Is the Dems lose MI or PA, you will know why. Ditto for WI and MN.
Yep. Unlike in 2016 this is not a race where we're going to see a last minute swing in either direction.
https://twitter.com/twt/status/1323324805060460547
No doubt the Dems will step on their own dicks every chance they get but I don't think it will be enough this time.
"Birds born in a cage think flying is an illness." - Alejandro Jodorowsky
"America is not so much a nightmare as a non-dream. The American non-dream is precisely a move to wipe the dream out of existence. The dream is a spontaneous happening and therefore dangerous to a control system set up by the non-dreamers." -- William S. Burroughs
By ALL THE MIDWEST States, he must mean WI, MI and MN.
Biden would need to win 2/3 of them in crowders scenario.
GREAT POST SINCE AZ IS RED IN HIS SCENARIO MORON
Yep. Unlike in 2016 this is not a race where we're going to see a last minute swing in either direction.
https://twitter.com/twt/status/1323324805060460547
both of you are lying to yourself, the FBI announcement the wknd before the election was good for hillary but yet atine has used a "hit hard" adverb
Last edited by thesidedish; 11-02-2020 at 12:29 PM.
Yep. Unlike in 2016 this is not a race where we're going to see a last minute swing in either direction.
https://twitter.com/twt/status/1323324805060460547
what do u think of this one u fkn pos moron?? "unlike 2016" he says sooo sure of himself. guy is gonna lose his ass
https://twitter.com/twt/status/1323306955201515521
i'm really sad that we've got about 48 more hours of dish posting on these forums
end of an era
you're right, im gonna take my $ and start a new site with tyde, fk these faggots
accident meant to green ya LOL
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Reply With Quote
