Mumbles, i disagree. Revolvers, especially with a spur for single action fire, and chambered in .22mag are much better for a newbie shooter to use as concealed...a .22mag is little recoil, enough bullet speed to penetrate most vest protection, have light trigger pull in single action (thus a spur is needed), if the jam just pull the trigger again (no clear sequence as with semi) and don't require any disassembly to clean...the trade off of easy maintenance and low recoil more than make up for the loss of rapid fire)Originally Posted by MumblesBadly
While I’m for some stronger/smarter gun control measures, I also support properly regulated concealed carry. And for a woman who isn’t afraid of a gun and is properly trained to use it, this is probably an excellent choice for a daily concealed carry. Especially if she has smaller hands.
In fact, Druff should consider applying for a concealed carry permit at his county’s sheriff’s office (per California law), and get one of these to have on him at all times when out and about. And especially when traveling by car to do live poker sessions. Some of those Cali cardroom parking lots look sketchy as fuck.
And that Baretta he earlier mentioned having is the wrong type of gun for him as a concealed carry, legal or otherwise, even though he has bigger hands.
First, it’s not nearly as easily concealed. And second, it has raised edges that could easily snag on his clothing or something in an emergency pull unless he practices them on a regular basis.
Charter Arm .22mag Pathfinder is an economical choice, less than $500, use a holster to overcome front sight snag (there are even purse holsters available)
the market for firearms is so mature/segmented that there are selections available to suit just about every individual
and conceal carry permit is LA County? for someone not a politician, in law enforcement, celebrity or connected??---hardy har har, that person won't get one
Reply With Quote
