Quote Originally Posted by Dan Druff View Post
Quote Originally Posted by blake View Post
druff is right though that we’re gonna need a pro-rioter take if we want this thread to continue
Funny you say that, because aside from the conservatives posting in the thread, it seems we have 7 pages of soft pro-rioter and pro-looter rhetoric.

How many PFA letfists have directly said they disagree with the rioting and the looting, and the people doing so should be arrested and prosecuted?

Somehow that's missing from most of the responses here. Maybe everyone's fingers are just tired and they physically can't bring themselves to type that?

DIRECT QUESTIONS TO PFA LEFITSTS:

1) Do you support the rioters? Should they be arrested and prosecuted?

2) Do you think the looting was okay? Should the looters be arrested and prosecuted?

I'm sure I will continue getting histrionic answers like, "A black man was murdered by police, what do you expect?" or "Why do you care more about a corporation like Target instead of a black man's life?", which purposely avoid answering the above. LOL Democrats

it's such a bad take and i'm temporarily rewarding it by even playing along.

per your supposed logic, when you started this thread and chose to focus on the rioting and not the black guy getting killed, we should have inferred that you supported the police killing that guy cause you didn't go out of your way to state otherwise. i mean, if you didn't focus on the guy getting killed by the police, that means you supported it, right?

if you *really* thought you were going to get people supporting the rioters, you're hopelessly brainwashed. but my guess is you knew no one here would have that opinion and the whole point of this thread was to get people mad at you just to generate content.

most of your opinions here must be made up, or, at the very least, heavily exaggerated to get people posting. i'm not knocking it, that's actually a decent way of keeping the forum alive.