Speaking of that 200 plus year old document. Here's the beginning of it
the right belongs to individuals, exclusively for self-defense in the home,[6][7][8][9] while also including, as dicta, that the right is not unlimited and does not preclude the existence of certain long-standing prohibitions such as those forbidding "the possession of firearms by felons and the mentally ill" or restrictions on "the carrying of dangerous and unusual weapons
Talk about interpretations
I ain't no fore-father but I'd be willing to bet they would consider the AR-15 to be both dangerous and unusual






Reply With Quote