It will cost me 56 cents

[Dan Druff]

So basically you checked her IP logs back in April? If so that's uncomfortably bizarre and pretty believable actually.

I don't check anyone's IP unless there's a reason to do so. No one believes this, but it's true.

I had some conversations with her privately the day before she supposedly was flying to AC, and then revealed to her that I was also going to be there on the exact same day. (I hadn't made this public.) She got very uncomfortable at that point and I got the vibe that she was bullshitting.

However, I thought that perhaps she was just afraid of seeing me there in person for some reason. For example, maybe she didn't tell her boyfriend that she was corresponding privately with dudes from poker, and it would look bad if I saw her and said hello. So I didn't press the issue, but I quietly looked some things up, and it appeared she never left Ohio. Just to verify that she didn't cancel the trip at the last minute, I messaged her that I was bouncing from AC early (which I was), and that otherwise I would have said hi to her there. She responded something like, "Yeah, maybe next time."

[Brittney Griner's Clit]

DanDruff you are posting too much in these threads.

Let's tone it down some.

[Pooh]

So basically you checked her IP logs back in April? If so that's uncomfortably bizarre and pretty believable actually.

I don't check anyone's IP unless there's a reason to do so. No one believes this, but it's true.

I had some conversations with her privately the day before she supposedly was flying to AC, and then revealed to her that I was also going to be there on the exact same day. (I hadn't made this public.) She got very uncomfortable at that point and I got the vibe that she was bullshitting.

However, I thought that perhaps she was just afraid of seeing me there in person for some reason. For example, maybe she didn't tell her boyfriend that she was corresponding privately with dudes from poker, and it would look bad if I saw her and said hello. So I didn't press the issue, but I quietly looked some things up, and it appeared she never left Ohio. Just to verify that she didn't cancel the trip at the last minute, I messaged her that I was bouncing from AC early (which I was), and that otherwise I would have said hi to her there. She responded something like, "Yeah, maybe next time."

But what's that even mean?

[gauchojake]

Some things never change. You should probably update the TOS to read that if you register here you have no reasonable expectation of privacy.

[DRK Star]

Kilgore Trout - Never Forget

[gimmick]

She has a heart of gold, but like tine said, she probably has a genetic predisposition towards committing evil acts occasionally. This isn't really her fault. Nobody really has any free will. We are all slaves to our genetics.

My first read of her from AMA thread was that she came of as a sociopath and i don't mean that as a negative thing. I didn't mention anything about it since at 40 she should be self aware and regarding rest of the forum it's her business. I liked her. Just wired differently.

I assumed snapping to people was from trying to quit adderall. She appeared to be off her game.

[big dick]

So she isn't a sexy milf with lot's of money?

[JACKDANIELS]

Some things never change. You should probably update the TOS to read that if you register here you have no reasonable expectation of privacy.

I assumed we all knew that todger checks everyones IP address, reads all our pm's and keeps a spreadsheet with our real names and current location in it.

I mean after all running pfa is a thankless task and he does run this forum at a loss so cut todger some slack, ok ?

[JACKDANIELS]

So she isn't a sexy milf with lot's of money?

that would depend on how old and poor you are big dick

[Dan Druff]

Some things never change. You should probably update the TOS to read that if you register here you have no reasonable expectation of privacy.

I actually plan to update the TOS very soon, but not for this reason. However, I will probably include something that your IP address and city will be visible to the site owner.

But this should be obvious to anyone who has ever used forums, or anyone with common sense for that matter.

[mwh72]

So she isn't a sexy milf with lot's of money?

No, apparently she has neck tattoos.

[big dick]

So she isn't a sexy milf with lot's of money?

that would depend on how old and poor you are big dick

Good point JD good point

[JACKDANIELS]

Some things never change. You should probably update the TOS to read that if you register here you have no reasonable expectation of privacy.

I actually plan to update the TOS very soon, but not for this reason. However, I will probably include something that your IP address and city will be visible to the site owner.

But this should be obvious to anyone who has ever used forums, or anyone with common sense for that matter.

dont forget to mention reading our pm's and your excel spreadsheet lol

[big dick]

So she isn't a sexy milf with lot's of money?

No, apparently she has neck tattoos.

Good ole white trash

[splitthis]

[gauchojake]

My post has nothing to do with IP's that are clearly visible to mods etc if you have half a clue about how the internet works. People leave clues as to their true identity - we know this. That doesn't mean that searching people out and posting the results for all to see is acceptable. Anyone who posts personal information should be banned. Period.

I appreciate what split did btw - she was legit concerned for the community and alerted Druff privately. I don't have a problem with that. Then this woman's info, mugshot, etc got splashed across the forum for no fucking reason. So did Searles wife's info. So did Hut's info. Could you put 2+2 together and figure out who they were? Yes of course. Is it okay to then post all sorts of info on this board? No.

Leaving that info up and saying "welp the cat's out of the bag" is also bullshit. Delete the info and banhammer. The end.

[sonatine]

My post has nothing to do with IP's that are clearly visible to mods etc if you have half a clue about how the internet works. People leave clues as to their true identity - we know this. That doesn't mean that searching people out and posting the results for all to see is acceptable. Anyone who posts personal information should be banned. Period.

I appreciate what split did btw - she was legit concerned for the community and alerted Druff privately. I don't have a problem with that. Then this woman's info, mugshot, etc got splashed across the forum for no fucking reason. So did Searles wife's info. So did Hut's info. Could you put 2+2 together and figure out who they were? Yes of course. Is it okay to then post all sorts of info on this board? No.

Leaving that info up and saying "welp the cat's out of the bag" is also bullshit. Delete the info and banhammer. The end.

so then they do it from a dupe.

i appreciate where youre coming from here but im not sure its realistic as described.

[Deal]

I cannot find evidence that she was ever a licensed attorney in any state.

I think paralegal got bumped up to attorney for appearance purposes, which isn't a huge deal, but that looks to be the case.

Is that like upgrading ones qualification from 'computer user' to 'computer scientist'?

[gauchojake]

My post has nothing to do with IP's that are clearly visible to mods etc if you have half a clue about how the internet works. People leave clues as to their true identity - we know this. That doesn't mean that searching people out and posting the results for all to see is acceptable. Anyone who posts personal information should be banned. Period.

I appreciate what split did btw - she was legit concerned for the community and alerted Druff privately. I don't have a problem with that. Then this woman's info, mugshot, etc got splashed across the forum for no fucking reason. So did Searles wife's info. So did Hut's info. Could you put 2+2 together and figure out who they were? Yes of course. Is it okay to then post all sorts of info on this board? No.

Leaving that info up and saying "welp the cat's out of the bag" is also bullshit. Delete the info and banhammer. The end.

so then they do it from a dupe.

i appreciate where youre coming from here but im not sure its realistic as described.

Fair enough. Ban the dupe, delete the info. The dupes aren't all that hard to figure out so then ban the user. It will only take 1 or 2 to send the message.

[Sanlmar]

My post has nothing to do with IP's that are clearly visible to mods etc if you have half a clue about how the internet works. People leave clues as to their true identity - we know this. That doesn't mean that searching people out and posting the results for all to see is acceptable. Anyone who posts personal information should be banned. Period.

I appreciate what split did btw - she was legit concerned for the community and alerted Druff privately. I don't have a problem with that. Then this woman's info, mugshot, etc got splashed across the forum for no fucking reason. So did Searles wife's info. So did Hut's info. Could you put 2+2 together and figure out who they were? Yes of course. Is it okay to then post all sorts of info on this board? No.

Leaving that info up and saying "welp the cat's out of the bag" is also bullshit. Delete the info and banhammer. The end.

I’ve given this enough time.

Gauchojake just said it for me.

This litany of dox and pictures is endless. Hutmaster’s experience was intolerable but again there will be no end. The discussion about whether Kilgore passed the bar or owes $3 is salacious noise and insults my intelligence.
Address the core issue then we can enjoy $3 rollings, lobster mac and the Dodgers.

A clear policy strictly enforced. Insta-perma-ban. Privately PM mod or GTFO.

I’ll just take a knee until some action is taken.