You're right.Originally Posted by sonatine
Cite some case law to back up the assertion that her transgressions would somehow, in some world, justify a day behind bars.
Seriously. Take just a dew drop from that ocean of righteous indication and use it to find some coge legal precedent for it.
It's TOTALLY legal to be a cunt.
"Druff would suck his own dick if it were long enough"- Brandon "drexel" Drexel
"ann coulter literally has more common sense than pfa."-Sonatine
"Real grinders supports poker fraud"- Ray Davis
"DRILLED HER GOOD"- HONGKONGER
You're right.
It's TOTALLY legal to be a cunt.
Its working out great for me so far.
"Birds born in a cage think flying is an illness." - Alejandro Jodorowsky
"America is not so much a nightmare as a non-dream. The American non-dream is precisely a move to wipe the dream out of existence. The dream is a spontaneous happening and therefore dangerous to a control system set up by the non-dreamers." -- William S. Burroughs
http://www.globalresearch.ca/trump-u...lated_articles
When was the last time the media threw 100% of its support behind one party’s presidential candidate? What does that say about the media?
Do you feel comfortable with the idea that a handful of TV and print-news executives are inserting themselves into the process and choosing our leaders for us? Is that the way democracy is supposed to work?
Check out this blurb from The Hill:
“The broadcast evening news programs ABC, NBC and CBS covered allegations against Trump by several women who claim he sexually assaulted them for more than 23 minutes on Thursday night. But revelations in the WikiLeaks dump of Clinton campaign chairman John Podesta which included…sympathy for Wall Street, advocation for open borders and blatant examples of media collusion ….got a whole 1 minute and 7 seconds combined.”
Ratio of negative coverage of Trump to Clinton: 23:1
In print on Thursday, it was no better. The New York Times had 11 negative stories on Trump…But zero on Clinton/WikiLeaks.
Ratio: 11:0.” (Media and Trump bias; Not even trying to hide it anymore, The Hill)
The article in The Hill also refers to a survey by the Washington Post and ABC News that asks participants six questions about allegations of sexual misconduct by Trump, but zero questions about Podesta’s incriminating emails.
Is that what you call “balance”?
I should state out-front, that I don’t plan to vote for either candidate, Trump or Clinton, so my claims of “bias” are not grounded in support for one candidate or the other. I am simply ticked-off by the fact that the media honchos have pulled out all the stops and are inserting themselves in the process to produce the outcome they want.
That’s what you call “rigging” an election. When you turn on Washington Week (Gwen Ifil) on public TV and see an assembled panel of six pundits–three conservatives and three liberals–and all six turn out to love Hillary and hate Trump; you can be reasonably certain that the election is rigged, because that’s what rigging is. Rather than providing background information about the candidate’s position on the issues so voters can make an informed decision, the media uses opinionmakers to heap praise on one candidate while savagely denigrating the other. The obvious goal is to shape public opinion in the way that best suits the interests of the people who own the media and who belong to the establishment of rich and powerful elites who run the country, the 1 percent. In this case, the ruling class unanimously backs Hillary Clinton, that much is obvious.
Does it really matter what she said in these speeches?
Not to me. The huge sums of money prove beyond any reasonable doubt that Clinton is selling access, tacitly agreeing to “go easy” on the big Wall Street investment banks provided they keep her foundation’s coffers overflowing. What other possible explanation could there be?
Do as many Americans know about Hillary’s sordid dealings with Wall Street as know about Trump’s “alleged” sexual dalliances?
Of course not. It’s not even close.
Do they know that Clinton was the driving force behind the intervention in Libya and Syria, where hundreds of thousands of civilians have died and seven million have been internally displaced? Do they know she was involved in the toppling of a democratically-elected government in Honduras or that a number of prominent neocons, who dragged the US into war in Iraq based on WMD lies, now support her?
Nope.
Do people know that Hillary had proof that ISIS –America’s arch enemy– was being funded and supported by our allies, Saudi Arabia and Qatar and, yet, she never reported the news to the American people??
Here’s a damning clip from one of the Podesta emails:
“We need to use our diplomatic and more traditional intelligence assets to bring pressure on the governments of Qatar and Saudi Arabia, which are providing clandestine financial and logistic support to Isis and other radical groups in the region.”
Remember when George W. Bush said that ‘We will treat the terrorists and the people who support the terrorists the same”?
Hillary must not have gotten that memo or we would have bombed Riyadh by now.
Dirtbag B Sonatine Hong Kong approve of Hillary's foreign policy track record, nuff said. How about you guys make a Hillary for President thread, Buzz off!
This is called rigging an election.
Social Media Blackout? FBI Emails Are Not ‘Trending Social Media Facebook, Twitter, Buzzfeed, Or Snapchat
New Evidence Links Voting Machines And Clinton Foundation
http://www.globalresearch.ca/new-evi...dation/5553880
Last edited by FPS_Russia; 10-31-2016 at 03:07 AM.
So suppose article is correct. What is in it for Trump by offering HUGE sweeteners to Moscow at this stage?
He shouldn't have anything to gain by doing that unless Russia is somehow helping Trump to pick up more votes.
If the whole wiki/assange/russia/trump link was ever proven. The song would then go "Lock Him up"
Actually the play is to make the best deals for the USA and the HUGE payback is to look the other way when Russia takes the UK. Sorry braj, hope you like vodka.
FBI in Internal Feud Over Hillary Clinton Probe
Laptop may contain thousands of messages sent to or from Mrs. Clinton’s private server
http://www.wsj.com/articles/laptop-m...ver-1477854957
Federal authorities reportedly battled over direction of Clinton email investigation
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2016...stigation.html
FBI agents told to "Stand Down" in the investigation into the Clinton Foundation.
The FBI and the Justice Department reportedly were at odds over how to investigate Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton as federal authorities announced they would take a new look at her emails.
The Wall Street Journal, citing people familiar with the matter, reported Sunday that senior law enforcement officials voiced skepticism several times of the strength of the bureau’s investigation into the Clinton Foundation, looked to condense the effort put into the probe and even told agents to limit their pursuit of the case.
The FBI initially started their investigation into the Clinton Foundation to determine whether financial crimes or influence peddling occurred related to the charity.
According to the paper, some investigators grew frustrated with the case and viewed some of the FBI leaders as uninterested. Some others involved in the case disagreed, saying that the FBI’s second-in-command Andrew McCabe was in a fight for control between the Justice Department and the FBI’s probing the foundation.
McCabe started overseeing the case into Clinton’s private email server earlier this year. However, McCabe seemed to be caught in between a rock and a hard place after it was learned last week that his wife Dr. Jill McCabe received more than $465,000 in campaign funds from a political action committee of Virginia Gov. Terry McAuliffe, a longtime Clinton ally and former foundation board member. She was running for an open state Senate seat in November, but lost.
bear in mind that comey told congress that the way hillary handled classified information was illegal, but said he wouldn't recommend charges against her because he couldn't prove she did it intentionally.
Cite some case law to back up the assertion that her transgressions would somehow, in some world, justify a day behind bars.
Seriously. Take just a dew drop from that ocean of righteous indication and use it to find some coge legal precedent for it.
also the WSJ just reported that the DOJ blocked the FBI's investigation into the Clinton Foundation, so..... wonderful country we have here. http://www.mediaite.com/print/report...on-foundation/
worst election in history and i'm including those involving african dictatorships. wake me in 4 years
Polls have been over sampled in favor of hillary for the last 5 months or so. You can argue the legality of her fuck ups forever, i will leave that up to the fbi. But theres no doubt all this is hurting hillary, at worst a devastating blow in public perception imo.
Get ready to say President Donald J Trump.
Not to mention the following months of Lol quotes.
AMERICANISM NOT GLOBALISM WILL BE OUR CREEDO
"Druff would suck his own dick if it were long enough"- Brandon "drexel" Drexel
"ann coulter literally has more common sense than pfa."-Sonatine
"Real grinders supports poker fraud"- Ray Davis
"DRILLED HER GOOD"- HONGKONGER
I'll cut you guys some slack, if the only news i digested for the last year came from corporate run entities, id be a drooling moron too.
"Druff would suck his own dick if it were long enough"- Brandon "drexel" Drexel
"ann coulter literally has more common sense than pfa."-Sonatine
"Real grinders supports poker fraud"- Ray Davis
"DRILLED HER GOOD"- HONGKONGER
Lol at drudge
"Druff would suck his own dick if it were long enough"- Brandon "drexel" Drexel
"ann coulter literally has more common sense than pfa."-Sonatine
"Real grinders supports poker fraud"- Ray Davis
"DRILLED HER GOOD"- HONGKONGER
The Clintons are a ‘crime family’: Ex-FBI big
http://nypost.com/2016/10/30/the-cli...ly-ex-fbi-big/
A high-ranking FBI official talked of La Cosa Clinton Sunday — as he placed the Democratic political family in the same category as the Gambinos, Colombos and Lucheses.
“The Clintons, that’s a crime family,” declared former New York FBI chief James Kallstrom in a radio interview.
“It’s like organized crime, basically. The Clinton Foundation is a cesspool.”
He echoed many of GOP presidential candidate Donald Trump’s talking points as he described Clintons as dishonest, greedy and scheming, during the interview with supermarket billionaire John Catsimatidis on AM970.
“It’s just outrageous how Hillary Clinton sold her office for money,” said Kallstrom who has long been a critic of the Clintons and President Obama.
“And she’s a pathological liar, and she’s always been a liar. And God forbid if we put someone like that in the White House.”
In another interview Sunday, Kallstrom said that the handling of the probe into Clinton’s emails by FBI Director James Comey was sowing dischord among rank and file FBI agents.
“There’s a major, major morale problem. I mean, it’s like a boiling cauldron,” Kallstrom told Fox News’ “Justice with Judge Jeanine” program Saturday night.
“I don’t know that ‘cause I talk to everybody down there, but I’ve talked to enough people . . . and they are totally disgusted with him.”
Kallstrom also ripped Attorney General Loretta Lynch, saying she never had a “real investigation” into the emails.
good point mint. on an unrelated note, would you care to comment on this?
It's not just Alex Jones. 40% of Trump's supporters in Florida think that Hillary is an actual demon.good point mint. on an unrelated note, would you care to comment on this?
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/wo...-a7388546.html
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oversa..._data_analysis
There's no oversampling in favor of anyone. Oversampling just doesn't mean what you think it does. You could try finding out what it means from the link i provided for you or you could spend a few minutes looking it up from google, but i'm fairly sure you'll rather stay ignorant since it takes a lot less effort.
_____________________________________________
LOLgood point mint. on an unrelated note, would you care to comment on this?
This is like the media saying wiki leaks was obtained in an illegal manner so just disregard them. The only important part of a message is the message itself. We can argue about semantics all day, but facts are self evident.
I'm way more qualified to talk about alex jones then any sniveling delusional hack journalist that takes a 3 minute video on youtube purposely out of context. I have been listening to the guy since 2003, and it's so hilarious to watch him purposely troll the media with these ridiculous statements, which he admits are metaphors he uses to troll the media, which they fall for everytime. He actually says it before or after his crazy rants.
Nonetheless, Alex is a provocateur of the highest order, the fact that Hillary Clinton mention him in particular in a speech was a surreal moment to say the least. And while the memory of some of you might be fading, it wasn't that long ago that he and wiki leaks were legitimized during the bush administration by certain democratic or left leaning news orginazations. I specifically remember the democrats in austin seeing him as THE anti establishment journalist. I find it funny how now those same democrats are calling him a "conspiracy theorist".
"Druff would suck his own dick if it were long enough"- Brandon "drexel" Drexel
"ann coulter literally has more common sense than pfa."-Sonatine
"Real grinders supports poker fraud"- Ray Davis
"DRILLED HER GOOD"- HONGKONGER
Anthony Weiner is GOD
Lol what a complete fuck up. These are the sort of people that are running our country.
Have over 10k in trump win bets anywhere from +300 to +450
Miracles can happen.
:freelewfather
so when he talked about the flies swarming on clinton and obama and the smell of sulfur coming off of them, he meant metaphorical flies and sulfur?LOLgood point mint. on an unrelated note, would you care to comment on this?
This is like the media saying wiki leaks was obtained in an illegal manner so just disregard them. The only important part of a message is the message itself. We can argue about semantics all day, but facts are self evident.
I'm way more qualified to talk about alex jones then any sniveling delusional hack journalist that takes a 3 minute video on youtube purposely out of context. I have been listening to the guy since 2003, and it's so hilarious to watch him purposely troll the media with these ridiculous statements, which he admits are metaphors he uses to troll the media, which they fall for everytime. He actually says it before or after his crazy rants.
Nonetheless, Alex is a provocateur of the highest order, the fact that Hillary Clinton mention him in particular in a speech was a surreal moment to say the least. And while the memory of some of you might be fading, it wasn't that long ago that he and wiki leaks were legitimized during the bush administration by certain democratic or left leaning news orginazations. I specifically remember the democrats in austin seeing him as THE anti establishment journalist. I find it funny how now those same democrats are calling him a "conspiracy theorist".
lol guys that's just him being a provocateur.
It's all subjective.so when he talked about the flies swarming on clinton and obama and the smell of sulfur coming off of them, he meant metaphorical flies and sulfur?LOL
This is like the media saying wiki leaks was obtained in an illegal manner so just disregard them. The only important part of a message is the message itself. We can argue about semantics all day, but facts are self evident.
I'm way more qualified to talk about alex jones then any sniveling delusional hack journalist that takes a 3 minute video on youtube purposely out of context. I have been listening to the guy since 2003, and it's so hilarious to watch him purposely troll the media with these ridiculous statements, which he admits are metaphors he uses to troll the media, which they fall for everytime. He actually says it before or after his crazy rants.
Nonetheless, Alex is a provocateur of the highest order, the fact that Hillary Clinton mention him in particular in a speech was a surreal moment to say the least. And while the memory of some of you might be fading, it wasn't that long ago that he and wiki leaks were legitimized during the bush administration by certain democratic or left leaning news orginazations. I specifically remember the democrats in austin seeing him as THE anti establishment journalist. I find it funny how now those same democrats are calling him a "conspiracy theorist".
lol guys that's just him being a provocateur.
If you want to focus on that part and only that part then you are entitled to do so.
"Druff would suck his own dick if it were long enough"- Brandon "drexel" Drexel
"ann coulter literally has more common sense than pfa."-Sonatine
"Real grinders supports poker fraud"- Ray Davis
"DRILLED HER GOOD"- HONGKONGER
_____________________________________________
There are currently 5 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 5 guests)
Reply With Quote
