Time to get on the TRUMP train

[Lord of the Fraud]

Speaking neutrally here.

You insinuated all liberals in 2016 are thugs to anybody that don't share their views.

But as a diehard liberal konger took exception to this by stating he's never assaulted anybody in his life.

You then take that as him condoning what happened in the video.

Election is sending you all crazy.

I didn't insinuate anything.

If you want to twist my words to fit your deranged perception on reality, then by all means do so.

You said this

Ya but being liberal in 2016 means you go around assaulting anyone who disagrees with you politically

Anyway not sure why I bothered tbh.

As you were chap.

[Muck Ficon]

letter from comey to his staff:

To all:

This morning I sent a letter to Congress in connection with the Secretary Clinton email investigation. Yesterday, the investigative team briefed me on their recommendation with respect to seeking access to emails that have recently been found in an unrelated case. Because those emails appear to be pertinent to our investigation, I agreed that we should take appropriate steps to obtain and review them.

Of course, we don’t ordinarily tell Congress about ongoing investigations, but here I feel an obligation to do so given that I testified repeatedly in recent months that our investigation was completed. I also think it would be misleading to the American people were we not to supplement the record. At the same time, however, given that we don’t know the significance of this newly discovered collection of emails, I don’t want to create a misleading impression. In trying to strike that balance, in a brief letter and in the middle of an election season, there is significant risk of being misunderstood, but I wanted you to hear directly from me about it.

Jim Comey

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/...=.31f1c61c5eb0

I pointed this gem out..... right after it came out. The emails appear to be pertinent, but at the same time they don't know the significance of them? That makes no sense. A Comey quote so cryptic that no one could ever understand it. This has Democrats and Republicans going nuts.

[blake]

letter from comey to his staff:

To all:

This morning I sent a letter to Congress in connection with the Secretary Clinton email investigation. Yesterday, the investigative team briefed me on their recommendation with respect to seeking access to emails that have recently been found in an unrelated case. Because those emails appear to be pertinent to our investigation, I agreed that we should take appropriate steps to obtain and review them.

Of course, we don’t ordinarily tell Congress about ongoing investigations, but here I feel an obligation to do so given that I testified repeatedly in recent months that our investigation was completed. I also think it would be misleading to the American people were we not to supplement the record. At the same time, however, given that we don’t know the significance of this newly discovered collection of emails, I don’t want to create a misleading impression. In trying to strike that balance, in a brief letter and in the middle of an election season, there is significant risk of being misunderstood, but I wanted you to hear directly from me about it.

Jim Comey

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/...=.31f1c61c5eb0

I pointed this gem out..... right after it came out. The emails appear to be pertinent, but at the same time they don't know the significance of them? That makes no sense. A Comey quote so cryptic that no one could ever understand it. This has Democrats and Republicans going nuts.

on msnbc, pete williams is hammering the point home that all comey meant by "pertinent" is that a new potential source of emails came out (weiner's computer); i.e., a new place to look. but that comey didn't mean to imply that he actually reviewed any emails yet or knows what they contain.

if that's true, my god, his letter to congress couldn't have been more poorly worded

[blake]

now reporter from NYtimes says that they are reviewing tens of thousands of emails (everything on his computer i guess) and that this will take months

[big dick]

sadly for Trump supporters it's 10 days till the election

[Muck Ficon]

now reporter from NYtimes says that they are reviewing tens of thousands of emails (everything on his computer i guess) and that this will take months

So what Comey did was create mass panic for absolutely no reason. His comments are now impacting a Presidential election. There are protocols in the FBI, this was handled beyond wrong. Standard protocol is shut up unless you are charging someone with something, and don't start rumors that could affect any election. He can't release any more info, even if it's "big league" info and someone is getting charged, like tomorrow. Until the charges are filed...he's supposed to be quiet. So the point in him doing this....well that is anyone's guess.

[Bootsy Collins]

I mailed in my ballot with my support going to Gary Johnson. Look at the bigger picture and deal with it!!!!

[limitles]

First video, politics. Second video everyone. Made it through half of the second;

;

[FPS_Russia]

Is this the same Trump sexual assault scandal that Druff personally debunked on PFA? The supposed victim released a video in link and r/politics (Clinton propaganda section)is giving this a platform. If this is fake then that's fucked up.
http://ijr.com/2016/10/717180-a-woma...source=twitter
PFA 7h 31m
http://pokerfraudalert.com/forum/sho...High-Pantomime



That pic of Abedin crying w Hillary looking pissed is pretty cray. r/donald

[hongkonger]

I've never assaulted anyone and I probably never will.

Lol at probably never will




So you seriously didn't see anything wrong with that video of that homeless lady getting beat up?

I see crazy people hold up crazy signs all the time, i just glance for a split second and continue. There is seriously a zealot like fervor to these leftist, very disturbing imo.

Yes I see something wrong with it. My issue was with the assertion that liberals assault those who disagree.

[hongkonger]

Someone Was Actually Arrested For In-Person Voter Fraud. She’s A Trump Supporter.
Oh, sweet irony.
http://m.huffpost.com/us/entry/us_58...0390e69d075a4?

Donald Trump regularly claims that the presidential election is “rigged” against him, thanks in part to “all too common” instances of voter fraud. “Watch Philadelphia. Watch St. Louis. Watch Chicago, watch Chicago. Watch so many other places,” the GOP nominee urged his supporters at a recent rally.

Election experts typically respond by pointing out that instances of fraud by voters at the polls are actually remarkably rare.

But they do happen. Case in point: Police in Des Moines, Iowa, said Friday that they had arrested Terri Lynn Rote, 55, on suspicion of voting twice in the general election.

Rote, a registered Republican, allegedly submitted ballots at two different early-voting locations in Polk County, Iowa, according to local media reports. She has been charged with first-degree election misconduct, a felony.

“I wasn’t planning on doing it twice. It was a spur of the moment,” Rote told Iowa Public Radio. “The polls are rigged.” She said she feared her first vote for Trump would be changed to a vote for Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton.

[sonatine]

now reporter from NYtimes says that they are reviewing tens of thousands of emails (everything on his computer i guess) and that this will take months

So what Comey did was create mass panic for absolutely no reason. His comments are now impacting a Presidential election. There are protocols in the FBI, this was handled beyond wrong. Standard protocol is shut up unless you are charging someone with something, and don't start rumors that could affect any election. He can't release any more info, even if it's "big league" info and someone is getting charged, like tomorrow. Until the charges are filed...he's supposed to be quiet. So the point in him doing this....well that is anyone's guess.

So yeah again Comey did exactly what he was supposed to.

He reported it to 8 congressmen, which is his job, and one of them, a bag of dicks named Chaffetz (R of course) leaked the report and tweeted a totally batshit interpretation of its contents (re-opening investigation etc), which the media picked up and went wild with.

[big dick]

Chaffetz is on my top 5 hate list. Pos cocksucker

[4Dragons]

roflcopter

2006 Audio Emerges of Hillary Clinton Proposing Rigging Palestine Election

Unearthed tape: 'We should have made sure that we did something to determine who was going to win'


audio at link: http://observer.com/2016/10/2006-aud...tine-election/

[vegas1369]

Trumps got this 100%. A lot of free money to be had here, I have a source at +550 I'm funneling a lot of money into. Going big on the new God King.

Wow, this is pretty amazing.

I fucking hate that fat slob Michael Moore, but nonetheless, it sure says alot when him, of all people, are rooting for Trump.

Not the case...


http://www.snopes.com/michael-moore-...-donald-trump/

[sonatine]

roflcopter

2006 Audio Emerges of Hillary Clinton Proposing Rigging Palestine Election

Unearthed tape: 'We should have made sure that we did something to determine who was going to win'


audio at link: http://observer.com/2016/10/2006-aud...tine-election/

Honestly if there was one concern I had above all others about Clinton in this race, its that shes had her fingers in waaaay too many intelligence pies to get to the finish line in a political theater this deeply compromised.

[hongkonger]

roflcopter

2006 Audio Emerges of Hillary Clinton Proposing Rigging Palestine Election

Unearthed tape: 'We should have made sure that we did something to determine who was going to win'


audio at link: http://observer.com/2016/10/2006-aud...tine-election/

You mean the sort of thing the CIA and State Department have been doing since WWII?

[DirtyB]

“We have a protester! By the way, were you paid $1,500 to be a thug? You can get him out. Get him out,”

-Donald Trump in North Carolina on Wednesday, to the only black guy in the crowd

It turns out that the guy is a 62 year old ex-Marine and Trump supporter. Oops.

http://www.vox.com/policy-and-politi...otester-racism

[Dan Druff]

Regarding the recent Hillary e-mail case being "reopened"...

Look, I understand what Chaffetz did would be considered unethical under normal circumstances.

However, I see it like the OJ Simpson thing in Nevada.

OJ was totally over-charged and over-sentenced for a crime which wasn't all that bad. By itself, this would have been a miscarriage of justice, but none of us felt bad for him because we all knew he got away with murder in California, so this was kind of the criminal justice system's way of making up for that.

When OJ got that sentence, most of us collectively said, "That's kind of a long sentence for something like this, but... ummm... we get it."

Same thing here.

Hillary got away with something she shouldn't have. If a private in the Army had committed the exact same offenses, he would have been court martialed and convicted. Hillary was treated differently because she's Hillary Clinton. That's the way it's always been with both Clintons, and they're used to it. That's why they bend and break the law so often. They know they always get away with it in the end. The Clintons beleve there is one set of rules for them, and another set for the rest of us. This is why it absolutely disgusts me to see Hillary so close to becoming a beloved historical figure -- an honor she does not deserve.

On the day Comey announced she wouldn't be charged, he first outlined all the ways she lied and broke the law. I knew that it sounded too good to be true. I knew that a "But we're not charging her" was coming later in the speech, and sure enough, that's what we got.

Nobody knows for sure why Comey didn't charge her. Some feel that he didn't want to the weight on his shoulders of basically deciding the Presidential election. Others felt that Bill Clinton's weird "airplane" meeting with Loretta Lynch had a lot to do with it. Even others felt that the Justice Department being under Obama's thumb figured a lot into it in the first place.

Bottom line is that there were clearly a lot of powerful influences in determining not to charge Hillary for what she did. If the DOJ doesn't want someone charged, the FBI isn't going to charge them.

Comey even had a really hard time explaining his decision under questioning by Trey Gowdy.

Given that Hillary wormed out of this one, and thus saved her candidacy, I don't mind that this is popping back into the spotlight now, even if some shady moves had to occur to make it happen.

It probably won't matter. We're only 10 days before the election, and there simply won't be any major developments in that time frame.

Still, you can't feel bad for Hillary. It's not like she's the victim of baseless accusations or hearsay. She is guilty of both intentional mishandling of classified material AND obstruction of justice. Do you really believe she deleted 33,000 e-mails (beyond recovery) because she didn't want anyone to see her discussions about yoga class and Chelsea's wedding? I mean, those explanations are so ludicrous that they seem like they're straight out of an unrealistic political farce.

The e-mail is back in the news because it never should have left the news in the first place.

[Dan Druff]

“We have a protester! By the way, were you paid $1,500 to be a thug? You can get him out. Get him out,”

-Donald Trump in North Carolina on Wednesday, to the only black guy in the crowd

It turns out that the guy is a 62 year old ex-Marine and Trump supporter. Oops.

http://www.vox.com/policy-and-politi...otester-racism

That was a pretty bad gaffe. Not sure what Trump was thinking.

He's probably so used to black people protesting that he automatically jumps to the conclusion without thinking further. Stupid.

BTW Barry, while that Vox article seems fine, I hope you can admit that Vox has generally been terrible during this election season.

I actually read pieces from both sides of the aisle, and I find that Vox is the left-wing site most guilty of publishing misleading or downright false articles. They've really become a sad mouthpiece of the extreme left.

I have found that certain right wing sites suffer from the same issues, but from what I've seen, these tend to be fringe sites without a huge following. Vox is way too big to be putting out as high of percentage of crap articles as they do. Sadly, I keep seeing well-meaning liberals attempting to quote Vox articles on Facebook, only to be made fools of when people point out all the holes. Often the people criticizing the holes are centrist types, so it's not a matter of people actively searching for ways to rebut them.

Vox is really just a shit operation.

Maybe they're doing this on purpose because that's what their readership wants to see. I know that's what some of the right wing sites are doing. I've seen some of those sites publish misleading or poorly-reasoned articles simply to pacify their right-wing audiences, and I cringe when I read them, knowing pandering bullshit when I see it.

I just hope you see the same pandering bullshit when you read Vox.