Time to get on the TRUMP train

[Dan Druff]

Embedded Tweet

https://twitter.com/twt/status/786395527319400448

Saw this fruitcake all over late night TV saying he thinks Trump is basically scum.

Turns out he's a hypocrite just like everyone else. New York Post just found a whole bunch of his online posts in porn forums saying all kinds of "awful" things.

http://nyp.st/2dPeAsO

Sorry, I'm still a fan of the Bone man.

I was hoping to read something really scandalous in that article, like perhaps reading that he posted really demeaning things about women, or perhaps had some unusually disgusting fetishes.

But no. A bunch of humdrum stuff.

About three months ago, that alias channeled his inner Donald Trump when he chimed in on hacked photos of a naked Jennifer Lawrence, the Daily Beast reported.

“Maybe she should have been more careful with her pics, but the bad guys are still the ones who sought them out and looked at them. By which I mean guys like me. I saw her butt hole. I liked it.”

So he thought Jennifer Lawrence should have been more careful with her pics. He was right. And OMG he liked seeing Jennifer Lawrence's butthole. That makes him an awful person somehow?

That same alias participated in some fringe forums, including “PreggoPorn” — about pregnant women in swimsuits — whom he referred to as “beautiful human submarines,” the site found.

Okay? So it seems he finds pregnant women sexually attractive. How does that make him awful?

That user even admitted to committing “felony insurance fraud” when he wrote that he forged documents “to make it look like I had car insurance so I wouldn’t get fired from my pizza delivery job.”

That's not felony insurance fraud. He lied to an employer about having personal auto insurance and forged documents in order to do it. There was no insurance fraud involved, because he did not receive nor attempt to receive any fraudulent insurance payments. He committed an infraction by driving without insurance, and at worst committed a minor misdemeanor by forging the insurance documents to misrepresent his financial fitness for a job.

If that's the worst thing this guy did, he's not anywhere close to "awful".

And StanGibson18 recently suggested that the killing of unarmed black teen Trayvon Martin was justified.

“It doesn’t have to be a one or the other view here. From what I read about the case the shooting of Trayvon Martin was justified,” he wrote.

He did note that George Zimmerman, who was acquitted on the basis of Florida’s controversial Stand Your Ground law, was a “big ole shit bird.”

“Bad guy legally kills kid in self defense,” he wrote. “Sucks for everybody, including us due to media fuckery.”

And he has a politically incorrect opinion about the Trayvon Martin shooting.

Again, how does this make him awful?



The NY Post really is shit.

Ken Bone was a moron to expose his online screen name which he used to post on porn forums, though.

[hongkonger]

What the hell sort of gibberish are you talking?

Vote for Hillary and you will die in a nuclear inferno or cancer from the fallout.

Riiiiiiiiight.

Even if true, and it's not unless Russia launches, do you think American voters should let other countries' leaders tell them how to vote or intimidate them?

[thesidedish]

Lol at brandon seemingly deciding trump isn't qualified to be president after "locker room banter", he's said worse shit on the campaign trail. I know it's a cause celeb to not like donald trump, i myself am not over joyed to have a blowhard as a president, but gun to my head im choosing trump.

Druff was right about Bill Clinton's predatory behavior towards women. Lol at trying to get druff to rattle off a specific article or journalist that proves he's a serial creep to women at 6am after a long show. I don't usually agree with druff on a lot of things, but he was spot on describing Bill's predatory behavior towards women.

Bill to the side, completely leave him and his baggage aside, i would have hammered away at Hillary's criminal tendencies, most recently her days at the state department where at best she was incompetent, and involved in proven conflict of interest situations that should have lead to indictments.

I think it's cuz he wants to give that annoying British guy who said hillary seems like the lesser of 2 evils a blowiob

[thesidedish]

Also druff maybe move the election coverage on the radio show closer to the start of the program since we're close to the election? I've wanted to call in a few times but I can only take 3 hrs maximum of irrelevant gambling talk before I fall asleep.

And it's not over, I'm an expert, ur not

[hongkonger]

Also druff maybe move the election coverage on the radio show closer to the start of the program since we're close to the election? I've wanted to call in a few times but I can only take 3 hrs maximum of irrelevant gambling talk before I fall asleep.

And it's not over, I'm an expert, ur not

[thesidedish]

This thread is pointless now. The case has been made against Trump. If you're still voting for him, you're very likely a terrible person. May God have mercy on your soul.

The party of morals and righteousness everybody. And what's with the last line? Liberals don't believe in god

[hongkonger]

thesidedish: I've been world class at everything I've tried moron, why would this be different

Because you're a world class retard

[TheXFactor]

Woman says Trump reached under her skirt and groped her in early 1990s
https://www.washingtonpost.com/polit...mepage%2Fstory

This brings the total count of sexually harassed women that have been groped by Trump to 11.

If Trump wants to know how to harass women and get away with it, he should have asked Bill Clinton instead of Billy Bush.

[tyde]

Jill Stein: Trump Is Less Dangerous Than Clinton; She Will Start Nuclear War With Russia



JILL STEIN: It's important to look at where we are going. It's not just a moment in time, but where has the strategy of voting for the lesser evil you will taken us?

All these times you have been told to but for the lesser evil because you didn't want the wars, or the meltdown of the climate, or the offshoring of our jobs, or the attack on immigrants or the massive bailout for Wall Street, that is actually what we have gotten. By the droves.

Because we with public interest allow ourselves to be silent and voted for the lesser evil. But the lesser evil doesn't solve the problem.

The Obama administration, even with both houses of Congress, actually did all of these fossil fuel emissions. "All of the above" gave us some renewable energy but it completely amplified and intensified our film production, which has been incredibly destructive to the climate.

The wars have gotten bigger, we are not bombing seven countries.

It is important to not just look at the rhetoric but also look at the track record and the reality is the lesser people and greater people is a race to the bottom, and even Donald Trump in the right wing extremism grows out of the policies of the Clintons, in particular Nafta, which sent our jobs overseas and Wall Street deregulation, which blew 9 million jobs up into smoke.

That is what is creating this right wing extremism. A vote for Hillary Clinton isn't going to fix it...

It is now Hillary Clinton that wants to start an air war with Russia over Syria by calling for a no fly zone.

We have 2000 nuclear missiles on hair-trigger alert. They are saying we are closer to a nuclear war than we have ever been.

Under Hillary Clinton, we could slide into nuclear war very quickly from her declared policy in Syria.

I sure won't sleep well at night if Donald Trump is elected, but I sure won't sleep well at night if Hillary Clinton elected. We have another choice other than these two candidates who are both promoting lethal policies.

On the issue of war and nuclear weapons, it is actually Hillary's policies which are much scarier than Donald Trump who does not want to go to war with Russia.

He wants to seek modes of working together, which is the route that we need to follow not to go into confrontation and nuclear war with Russia.


http://www.realclearpolitics.com/vid...clear_war.html

[limitles]

Jill Stein: Trump Is Less Dangerous Than Clinton; She Will Start Nuclear War With Russia



JILL STEIN: It's important to look at where we are going. It's not just a moment in time, but where has the strategy of voting for the lesser evil you will taken us?

All these times you have been told to but for the lesser evil because you didn't want the wars, or the meltdown of the climate, or the offshoring of our jobs, or the attack on immigrants or the massive bailout for Wall Street, that is actually what we have gotten. By the droves.

Because we with public interest allow ourselves to be silent and voted for the lesser evil. But the lesser evil doesn't solve the problem.

The Obama administration, even with both houses of Congress, actually did all of these fossil fuel emissions. "All of the above" gave us some renewable energy but it completely amplified and intensified our film production, which has been incredibly destructive to the climate.

The wars have gotten bigger, we are not bombing seven countries.

It is important to not just look at the rhetoric but also look at the track record and the reality is the lesser people and greater people is a race to the bottom, and even Donald Trump in the right wing extremism grows out of the policies of the Clintons, in particular Nafta, which sent our jobs overseas and Wall Street deregulation, which blew 9 million jobs up into smoke.

That is what is creating this right wing extremism. A vote for Hillary Clinton isn't going to fix it...

It is now Hillary Clinton that wants to start an air war with Russia over Syria by calling for a no fly zone.

We have 2000 nuclear missiles on hair-trigger alert. They are saying we are closer to a nuclear war than we have ever been.

Under Hillary Clinton, we could slide into nuclear war very quickly from her declared policy in Syria.

I sure won't sleep well at night if Donald Trump is elected, but I sure won't sleep well at night if Hillary Clinton elected. We have another choice other than these two candidates who are both promoting lethal policies.

On the issue of war and nuclear weapons, it is actually Hillary's policies which are much scarier than Donald Trump who does not want to go to war with Russia.

He wants to seek modes of working together, which is the route that we need to follow not to go into confrontation and nuclear war with Russia.


http://www.realclearpolitics.com/vid...clear_war.html

In the interest of time I stopped reading halfway through. The author of this piece is a hack. He cannot formulate a proper sentence, grammatical errors and general opinions abound. I don't think he really understands the term "lesser of two evils".

Oh yeah the headline. Oh boy. This from the respected realclearpolitics.com

My bad. Didn't grasp that this was a transcript. Still, whoever spewed this crap should be ignored

[sonatine]

So to be clear, the argument for taking Russia's ludicrous nuclear bluff seriously is that we should preemptively surrender the republic and its commitments to our allies, just in case?

[sonatine]

Also the reason we have nuclear subs at all is to checkmate the hilarious assertion that a first strike from a hostile power would have any equity for them whatsoever.

[hongkonger]

Jill Stein: Trump Is Less Dangerous Than Clinton; She Will Start Nuclear War With Russia



JILL STEIN: It's important to look at where we are going. It's not just a moment in time, but where has the strategy of voting for the lesser evil you will taken us?

All these times you have been told to but for the lesser evil because you didn't want the wars, or the meltdown of the climate, or the offshoring of our jobs, or the attack on immigrants or the massive bailout for Wall Street, that is actually what we have gotten. By the droves.

Because we with public interest allow ourselves to be silent and voted for the lesser evil. But the lesser evil doesn't solve the problem.

The Obama administration, even with both houses of Congress, actually did all of these fossil fuel emissions. "All of the above" gave us some renewable energy but it completely amplified and intensified our film production, which has been incredibly destructive to the climate.

The wars have gotten bigger, we are not bombing seven countries.

It is important to not just look at the rhetoric but also look at the track record and the reality is the lesser people and greater people is a race to the bottom, and even Donald Trump in the right wing extremism grows out of the policies of the Clintons, in particular Nafta, which sent our jobs overseas and Wall Street deregulation, which blew 9 million jobs up into smoke.

That is what is creating this right wing extremism. A vote for Hillary Clinton isn't going to fix it...

It is now Hillary Clinton that wants to start an air war with Russia over Syria by calling for a no fly zone.

We have 2000 nuclear missiles on hair-trigger alert. They are saying we are closer to a nuclear war than we have ever been.

Under Hillary Clinton, we could slide into nuclear war very quickly from her declared policy in Syria.

I sure won't sleep well at night if Donald Trump is elected, but I sure won't sleep well at night if Hillary Clinton elected. We have another choice other than these two candidates who are both promoting lethal policies.

On the issue of war and nuclear weapons, it is actually Hillary's policies which are much scarier than Donald Trump who does not want to go to war with Russia.

He wants to seek modes of working together, which is the route that we need to follow not to go into confrontation and nuclear war with Russia.


http://www.realclearpolitics.com/vid...clear_war.html

Normally I'm inclined to vote for Green candidates but Stein is wacko and I can't vote for her. The anti-vaccine stuff bothered me a lot.

[hongkonger]

So to be clear, the argument for taking Russia's ludicrous nuclear bluff seriously is that we should preemptively surrender the republic and its commitments to our allies, just in case?

Putin wants Trump so badly, he knows what an edge he will have over the US.

[limitles]

Also the reason we have nuclear subs at all is to checkmate the hilarious assertion that a first strike from a hostile power would have any equity for them whatsoever.

Exactly. Any war involving a superpower will likely be the last war. To the victor there will be no spoils.

[sonatine]

So to be clear, the argument for taking Russia's ludicrous nuclear bluff seriously is that we should preemptively surrender the republic and its commitments to our allies, just in case?

Putin wants Trump so badly, he knows what an edge he will have over the US.

I said it several times so far; Trump is explicitly campaigning on the promise he will ignore our commitments to NATO/our allies, and the principle benefactor of that will be an expansionist Russia.

If Obama suggested we respond to Russia's 'vote for the idiot for or we reduce you to glowing ash' bluff the way Trump's supporters are suggesting we respond to it, those same Trump supporters would raze every city in the republic by dawn.

[thesidedish]

Putin wants Trump so badly, he knows what an edge he will have over the US.

I said it several times so far; Trump is explicitly campaigning on the promise he will ignore our commitments to NATO/our allies, and the principle benefactor of that will be an expansionist Russia.

If Obama suggested we respond to Russia's 'vote for the idiot for or we reduce you to glowing ash' bluff the way Trump's supporters are suggesting we respond to it, those same Trump supporters would raze every city in the republic by dawn.

And I've said several times that trump only said that so the other countries will pay their fair share, which they will.


Pay ur fair share or risk expansionist russia, I wonder what option they will choose...easy game

[sonatine]

I said it several times so far; Trump is explicitly campaigning on the promise he will ignore our commitments to NATO/our allies, and the principle benefactor of that will be an expansionist Russia.

If Obama suggested we respond to Russia's 'vote for the idiot for or we reduce you to glowing ash' bluff the way Trump's supporters are suggesting we respond to it, those same Trump supporters would raze every city in the republic by dawn.

And I've said several times that trump only said that so the other countries will pay their fair share, which they will.


Pay ur fair share or risk expansionist russia, I wonder what option they will choose...easy game

And if they cant just sell something on ebay to cover their gambling losses, we just let Putin quietly take over Europe?

[thesidedish]

And I've said several times that trump only said that so the other countries will pay their fair share, which they will.


Pay ur fair share or risk expansionist russia, I wonder what option they will choose...easy game

And if they cant just sell something on ebay to cover their gambling losses, we just let Putin quietly take over Europe?

They will pay, it's not even a question, they only have to chip in 2%, just being deadbeats

[MumblesBadly]

In case you missed some of the latest regarding the Perv-in-Chief.