Hi, my picks for game 4, under is -110, all other bets are -115. 4 $250 units wagered.
Total -207 (-110)
Andrew Bogut total pts+rebounds+assists over 11.5
Harrison Barnes total pts+rebounds+assists over 15
J.R. Smith total pts+rebounds+assists over 17
Sawks (Wright) v Twins (Duffy fucking awful + awful BP)
Sox knuckleballer Wright has been amazing. It is hot & humid in Minnesota & this helps knuckleballs dance.
I still think Twins score 2 or more so that should be enough for a light totals bet. Ortiz returns back to where he started and the bench will be amped.
Sawks -1.5 +115 Go ahead
Sawks ML -133. Don't be afraid
Sawks o9 -120 Go light
If I see 5 before LAD Giants start I'll tap that just for the value.
Just can't find any thing else.
Wright is playing with fire but getting away with it all night. If the thinks put up just 2 runs this will go over.Originally Posted by Sanlmar
That's the knuckle ball for ya. Defies reason
The catcher Hannigan threw up after catching Wright recently.
Nobody has any fucking idea where it's going. But his shit is moving crazy
Thought that was god
Looks like a triple play shaping up for us tonight
Oh by the way. Took that 5 -125 LAD Giants per plan.
So sweet
And with zero help from the twinkles we got the push.... 1 more run please
The public won on games 1-3 , should have known GS was going to be a good bet
My buddy is ar the Luxor and he said they hung -3 E The last 45 min until game time. That's Vegas saying we still don't mind taking the Warriors.
Put in this little play when the Cavs were up 8 points early in the third just for a sweat. I missed out on getting it at +240 one possession earlier.
Jun 10, 2016
10:37 PM
#670343622
Placed by Web
Single #670343622
Basketball - NBA Playoffs - Moneyline
Golden State Warriors @ Cleveland Cavaliers
Golden State Warriors (+190) Jun 10, 2016 9:00 PM
$60.00
$114.00
Hopefully no late rally happens in the last 4 minutes and if it don't then the Warriors will be popping bottles Monday night.
Hopefully someone at this game got video of the fan running on the court getting tackled by security.
Edit:
Apparently this is the guy:
https://twitter.com/twt/status/741475103674912768
Edit: GOT IT
Last edited by BeerAndPoker; 06-10-2016 at 09:13 PM.
comparing Lebron to Jordan is an insult to Jordan mj was soooo much better
So this was a big day for underdogs hitting in MLB.
Atlanta +193 won
San Diego +195 won
Miami +147 won
Cardinals +151 won
I didn't bet anything. Wasn't available to do it today.
I would definitely have bet SD +195. Remember when I said you should always take the big underdog in games at Denver, because conventional pitching advantages go out the window? Yeah.
Wouldn't have taken Atlanta or Miami. Maybe would have taken Cardinals.
I do feel bad that I missed out on both SD +195 (which I would have bet for sure) and the Miami/AZ over, as Nicolino vs Corbin was like a guaranteed over.
Wouldn't have bet NBA today, as I had no idea where that one was going.
I'm a little skeptical that the crap-hitting Padres can outscore the Rockies again, but I gotta stick to the plan to go with any big dog in Denver.
And I like Philly today, as well, as Nola is pitching. He has a 2.65 ERA and 0.987 WHIP. Lots of upside with this kid, and he's facing Roark who got bombed last time out.
So...
Philly (Nola) +150 at Washington (Roark)
San Diego (Johnson) +195 at Colorado (Chatwood)
Chatwood has killed it on the road, but has an ERA over 6 at Coors.
my dogs today are Clev and Texas, both on the road but with good pitchers, better teams and nice odds. Only one has to win to cover the bet. Plus Texas had Seattle figured out last series. Also like Washington, Col and Boston. Staying away from the Cubs again, the odds just don't justify betting on them. Even against LOL Atlanta with Arrieta.
Belmont Stakes -
4. Suddenbreakingnews (Smith/Von Homel) 0.0 (+600) Risk $10.00 to Win $60.00
Hedged bet with the fav:
11. Exaggerator (Desormeaux/Desormeaaux) 0.0 (+140) Risk $10.00 to Win $14.00
Another sawks over
Well, you were right about Washington and Colorado, sadly.
Boston, too, though I didn't have a position on that game.
I do like your Texas pick. I just shot off a +170 on them to hopefully get back most of my money from my unfortunate 0-2 earlier.
Play for Sunday
Tigers ML
I'm not sure what it will be tomorrow but on some books it's around +110 at the moment (even money on bovada).
Not sure any of you know who Michael Fulmer is but he's a solid rookie pitcher on a heater right now. Fulmer hasn't allowed a run in the last 22 1/3 innings and just one run in the last 28 1/3 innings pitched. He is also 4-0 in his last five road games.
I'll take the Tigers with Fulmer throwing over Pineda and his 6.14 ERA all day long.
Got 500 @ +107
So this was pretty fucking amazing.
Texas down 1-0 in the top of the 9th with 2 out.
Fat ass Prince Fielder at the plate, and I'm pretty sure he's going to whiff and send me to 0-3 for the day.
Hitting like .200 with 4 HR, seems like a lost cause.
Then he smacks one way over the wall, and it's a tie game. Seattle bricks bottom of inning, goes to extras.
10th inning, Texas gets a guy to 3rd, then an intentional walk, but they don't score.
Seattle threatens in the bottom of the 10th with bases loaded, but does not score.
Top 11, Odor homers to lead off the inning. Texas gets 2nd and 3rd with 1 out, but whiffs twice and need their 1 run to stand up.
Bottom 11, Aoki hit by a pitch to lead off. Attempted sacrifice results in an out at 2nd in what looked like both a bad call and bad upholding on review, but I'll take it. Cano flies out on a ball misplayed by Desmond and almost dropped in CF. Nelson Cruz hits a really weird infield single, and now it's 1st and 2nd. Seager hits a long, scary fly ball, but it's hauled in, and the Rangers win.
Thanks Charham. Wouldn't have bet this one if you hadn't pointed it out.
I was correct to not follow your pick of the Indians, but you went 4-1 in your picks so I can't criticize you. Bottom line is that your pick almost erased my 0-2 losses, since this win was +170. Great job.
There are currently 3 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 3 guests)
Reply With Quote
