View Poll Results: Who would you vote for right now?

Voters
117. You may not vote on this poll
  • Rand Paul

    7 5.98%
  • Christie

    1 0.85%
  • Trump

    48 41.03%
  • Hilary

    11 9.40%
  • Bernie

    33 28.21%
  • Carson

    1 0.85%
  • Cruz

    6 5.13%
  • Rubio

    6 5.13%
  • Bush

    1 0.85%
  • Kasich

    3 2.56%
Page 109 of 145 FirstFirst ... 95999105106107108109110111112113119 ... LastLast
Results 2,161 to 2,180 of 2889

Thread: President 2016

  1. #2161
    100% Organic MumblesBadly's Avatar
    Reputation
    94
    Join Date
    Jun 2015
    Location
    In the many threads of this forum
    Posts
    9,416
    Load Metric
    104113730
    Quote Originally Posted by Dan Druff View Post
    This election has exposed the problem with America lately.

    Both major parties have large bases of people who vote for foolish and misguided reasons.

    Democrats have:
    - Freeloaders who will vote for whichever candidate gets them the most free stuff
    - Rich and middle class liberals who feel guilty about their success, and feel the need to vote for a candidate who will make big government solve everyone else's problems, thus making themselves feel less guilty
    - Idealistic and naive kids who don't understand how the world works yet

    Republicans have:
    - Uneducated morons who vote for the candidate who gives the best-sounding 1-sentence solution to complicated problems
    - Religious nuts who are obsessed with topics such as abortion and gay marriage

    Then there are reasonable Republicans and Democrats who don't fall into any of these groups, and both are disgusted at what is going on right now.

    The above groups on the Democratic side are the ones propelling Bernie Sanders to various primary victories, and are forcing the Democratic Party unreasonably to the left. I look at some of the stuff Bernie supports, and it's unbelievable that a sizable wing of the Democratic Party thinks it's realistic.

    Trump was victorious thanks to the uneducated wing of the Republican Party, as his 1-liners sounded appealing to them. The religious nuts didn't negate him very much, because some of them are also the uneducated morons, so a sizable number of them still voted for him even though he otherwise doesn't align with their social beliefs.

    And then there's Hillary, who just about no one likes, and whose own party realizes she's super shady. But people voted for her out of practicality, knowing that Bernie's plans are unrealistic nonsense, and that he would get killed in a general election. Ironically, Bernie would likely beat Trump, but Democrats at the time believed Trump probably wouldn't be the nominee, so they voted for the safer candidate. But the general sentiment in the Democratic Party is that they dislike her and is only preferable to a Republican.

    So this is where we stand.

    We have unrealistic fools on the left screaming for the Democratic Party to take a more liberal platform.

    We have a Democratic candidate (and overall frontrunner) who is known by EVERYONE to be shady, and no one likes, but keeps winning by default.

    We have an authoritarian attention whore Republican candidate, who accidentally backed into the nomination by inadvertently appealing to the moron portion of the Republican Party when intentionally saying outrageous things.

    Bleh.
    For Trump's sake, Druff! There is a huge swath of middle class income earners who support Bernie because they know that *both* the GOP and the conservative Dems have sold out to the investor class. But they aren't the ones who believe the racist "It's the illegal Mexicans' fault!" bullshit passed off by Trump.

    For example, Hillary Fucking Clinton has been in the pocket of the big banks ever since she first ran for the Senate, and is only now trying to sound like she will rein in their influence over US domestic policy. I live in a red state, so I don't expect my presidential vote to count. But if I lived in a blue state, I'd probably vote for Trump to help send a message to the Democratic establishment that they have too much embraced the winner-take-most economic philosophy that is the core of the GOP's domestic policy.
    _____________________________________________
    Quote Originally Posted by Dan Druff View Post
    I actually hope this [second impeachment] succeeds, because I want Trump put down politically like a sick, 14-year-old dog. ... I don't want him complicating the 2024 primary season. I just want him done.
    Quote Originally Posted by Dan Druff View Post
    Were Republicans cowardly or unethical not to go along with [convicting Trump in the second impeachment Senate trial]? No. The smart move was to reject it.

  2. #2162
    Diamond DRK Star's Avatar
    Reputation
    1282
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    8,401
    Load Metric
    104113730
    http://www.theamericanmirror.com/bil...-black-people/


    Bill Clinton visits Louisville, ‘literally serves fried chicken to black people’

  3. #2163
    Plutonium Sanlmar's Avatar
    Reputation
    4668
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Posts
    23,019
    Load Metric
    104113730
    It was nice to see the post from Druff. Took a little bit of time and effort.

    Druff lays this mess at the feet of the voters. He blames the voters for what is wrong with America.

    I choose to blame the political process that spits out these candidates.

    I have actually felt a bit positive about the fact that voters embraced two candidates that weren't the product of the machine.

    Druff made a comment that he is relieved that the GOP convention won't be brokered and the GOP broken as a result. That actually would have been the only good to come out of this election. A hard look and rebuilding/tanking would have been worth it.

    Why in gods name do we still have a two party system anyway? This isn't the 1800's.

    That career politics is ruled by self interest above public interest is beyond discussion. Nobody is niave. Hate Trump but he isn't beholden to anyone. Yet.

    Saw this 60 Minutes piece last month "Dialing for Dollars". Congressmen spending 30-40 hours a week fundraising. Actually, that the Democratic & Republican parties coach newcomers to congress on this practice. Astounding but consistent.

    Lol, the central character in this story is newcomer Florida Republican David Jolly who is running against that filthy political bot Marco Rubio.

    Story starts 15:10. CBS are pricks about content. Can someone help with my video script. Ihave no idea what's going on

    [URL="http://youtu.be/qk3hS7iPXZY"[/URL]


     
    Comments
      
      FPS_Russia: 15:10 required viewing. I consider this a national security issue.
    Last edited by Sanlmar; 05-04-2016 at 11:20 AM.

  4. #2164
    100% Organic MumblesBadly's Avatar
    Reputation
    94
    Join Date
    Jun 2015
    Location
    In the many threads of this forum
    Posts
    9,416
    Load Metric
    104113730
    Quote Originally Posted by Sanlmar View Post
    It was nice to see the post from Druff. Took a little bit of time and effort.

    Druff lays this mess at the feet of the voters. He blames the voters for what is wrong with America.

    I choose to blame the political process that spits out these candidates.

    I have actually felt a bit positive about the fact that voters embraced two candidates that weren't the product of the machine.

    Druff made a comment that he is relieved that the GOP convention won't be brokered and the GOP broken as a result. That actually would have been the only good to come out of this election. A hard look and rebuilding/tanking would have been worth it.

    Why in gods name do we still have a two party system anyway? This isn't the 1800's.

    That career politics is ruled by self interest above public interest is beyond discussion. Nobody is niave. Hate Trump but he isn't beholden to anyone. Yet.

    Saw this 60 Minutes piece last month "Dialing for Dollars". Congressmen spending 30-40 hours a week fundraising. Actually, that the Democratic & Republican parties coach newcomers to congress on this practice. Astounding but consistent.

    Lol, the central character in this story is newcomer Florida Republican David Jolly who is running against that filthy political bot Marco Rubio.

    Story starts 15:10. CBS are pricks about content. Can someone help with my video script. Ihave no idea what's going on

    _____________________________________________
    Quote Originally Posted by Dan Druff View Post
    I actually hope this [second impeachment] succeeds, because I want Trump put down politically like a sick, 14-year-old dog. ... I don't want him complicating the 2024 primary season. I just want him done.
    Quote Originally Posted by Dan Druff View Post
    Were Republicans cowardly or unethical not to go along with [convicting Trump in the second impeachment Senate trial]? No. The smart move was to reject it.

  5. #2165
    100% Organic MumblesBadly's Avatar
    Reputation
    94
    Join Date
    Jun 2015
    Location
    In the many threads of this forum
    Posts
    9,416
    Load Metric
    104113730
    Quote Originally Posted by Sanlmar View Post

    Why in gods name do we still have a two party system anyway? This isn't the 1800's.
    This is a question I explored using the Google some years ago during the many hours I played like a rock in AC waiting for decent starting cards. And it seems to be because of a combination of our voting systems (almost universally plurality voting) with single member districts. And there is even a political science name for this effect: Durvinger's Law.

    https://www.minnpost.com/eric-black-...o-party-system

    P.S. Because we have an early 19th-century election-and-representation system.

    P.P.S Enjoy learning how we are fucking stuck in that sub-optimal election/representation scheme!
    _____________________________________________
    Quote Originally Posted by Dan Druff View Post
    I actually hope this [second impeachment] succeeds, because I want Trump put down politically like a sick, 14-year-old dog. ... I don't want him complicating the 2024 primary season. I just want him done.
    Quote Originally Posted by Dan Druff View Post
    Were Republicans cowardly or unethical not to go along with [convicting Trump in the second impeachment Senate trial]? No. The smart move was to reject it.

  6. #2166
    Silver El Gallo's Avatar
    Reputation
    463
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    926
    Load Metric
    104113730
    Quote Originally Posted by DRK Star View Post
    Is there any information to state that the Repub supporters are not as intelligent as the Dem supporters, because I have seen some Prrreeety stupid Bernie supporters on social media.


    How can one state that one is less intelligent than the other group? What studies?
    Ill help. Think of the 5 smartest people you know, who do they support? Now pick the 5 dumbest people you know, who do they support?

    That works a lot.

     
    Comments
      
      thesidedish: Im very smart and i love trump, fuck off with ur self serving bias
      
      rum dick: not bad not bad at all
      
      MumblesBadly: thesidedish doesn't understand that people overestimate their own level of intelligence. Case in point: El Gallo implied knowing *other* people who like Sanders or Trump, which thesidedish didn't understand despite his supposed high intelligence.
    We pray for understanding as we all occasionally request back door action by accident, when we tried to call an electrician. It happens, it simply happens.

  7. #2167
    Diamond DRK Star's Avatar
    Reputation
    1282
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    8,401
    Load Metric
    104113730
    Its actually pretty close. You're one of the smartest people I know, and you love Bernie.

    BUT, I know some smart repubs and they want Trump.


    Two of the dumbest people I know from facebook, wouldnt even know how to explain why they like their candidate.

     
    Comments
      
      El Gallo: fair enough

  8. #2168
    Silver El Gallo's Avatar
    Reputation
    463
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    926
    Load Metric
    104113730
    I don't know a singular successful intelligent person in my network of friends or colleagues that supports Trump. I'm sure they exist and are larger in size than I estimate. I also don't know any Hillary supporters, but there she is, leading.
    We pray for understanding as we all occasionally request back door action by accident, when we tried to call an electrician. It happens, it simply happens.

  9. #2169
    Diamond DRK Star's Avatar
    Reputation
    1282
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    8,401
    Load Metric
    104113730
    Keep in mind, just because they support him, doesnt mean they like him.

    I have to support him now. I dont have a choice.

  10. #2170
    Diamond DRK Star's Avatar
    Reputation
    1282
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    8,401
    Load Metric
    104113730
    there are plenty of intelligent people who vote Republican because they see what Democratic leadership has done to cities like Chicago.

  11. #2171
    Silver El Gallo's Avatar
    Reputation
    463
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    926
    Load Metric
    104113730
    I never said anything about intelligence and Republicans. I am specifically saying Donald Trump. The fact that you support him, a man who has said terrible things about women, minorities and religious people, says a lot about what you are willing to ignore and also your judgment in character. Donald Trump is NOT the republican party... most of the party hates him, rightfully so.
    We pray for understanding as we all occasionally request back door action by accident, when we tried to call an electrician. It happens, it simply happens.

  12. #2172
    Platinum Krypt's Avatar
    Reputation
    723
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Washington DC
    Posts
    4,399
    Load Metric
    104113730
    Quote Originally Posted by El Gallo View Post
    I don't know a singular successful intelligent person in my network of friends or colleagues that supports Trump. I'm sure they exist and are larger in size than I estimate. I also don't know any Hillary supporters, but there she is, leading.
    Woah bro, are you saying 4Dragons, Tyde, and Pooh aren't intellectual behemoths?

     
    Comments
      
      GambleBotsSatire: pop pop pop

  13. #2173
    Silver El Gallo's Avatar
    Reputation
    463
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    926
    Load Metric
    104113730
    Quote Originally Posted by DRK Star View Post
    there are plenty of intelligent people who vote Republican because they see what Democratic leadership has done to cities like Chicago.
    There are a ton of cities that have been ruined by Republican leadership as well as many that have been ruined by Democratic leadership. There have also been states that have done much better under Republican leadership and many that have done much better under Democratic leadership. For every Detroit there is a Minneapolis. Don't base your decisions or assumptions with only the data you have created in your bubble.

     
    Comments
      
      Shizzmoney: they all suck rep
      
      big dick: .
    We pray for understanding as we all occasionally request back door action by accident, when we tried to call an electrician. It happens, it simply happens.

  14. #2174

  15. #2175
    Photoballer 4Dragons's Avatar
    Reputation
    2687
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    Detroit
    Posts
    10,648
    Load Metric
    104113730
    Great video analysis from Carl Bernstein

    http://www.breitbart.com/video/2016/...s-and-entitled


    On Wednesday’s “CNN Tonight,” Journalist and author Carl Bernstein stated that there would be “very damaging” leaks from the investigation into Democratic presidential candidate former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s email, and described her conduct as “what she did was an act of recklessness, and entitlement, that there’s no excuse for.”

    Bernstein began by stating that in the general election “all bets are off,” including the usual GOP-Dem breakdown as an important factor, celebrity might be more important than ideology, and “TMZ, Drudge, new media, [are] going to have a huge role in this, much more than the usual, fact-based media.”
    He further said that GOP presidential candidate Donald Trump’s campaign had expanded from a “nativist, almost neo-fascist campaign” to when where “there might be a kind of screw you vote, about Washington, about the process, that he could be the beneficiary of.” And that “a lot of Democrats around Hillary Clinton” that he had talked to were “very worried” about running against Trump, and that some “Republican regulars” who were part of the Stop Trump movement he talked to pegged Trump’s chances against Hillary at at least 25%.
    Bernstein then said, “[T]he folks around Hillary, who are not the usual Clinton Kool Aid drinkers…they’re worried, they know that their candidate has performed awfully, and that [Democratic presidential candidate Senator] Bernie Sanders (I-VT) has drubbed her.”
    He added, that while he doesn’t believe there will be an indictment, “I think there are going to be some leaks that are going to be very damaging to Hillary Clinton. Look, what she did was an act of recklessness, and entitlement, that there’s no excuse for. And she’s going to have to go up to the FBI, under oath, and explain why she did this. And it’ll be the first time that she’ll have to give a really straight explanation, and it’s not going to be pretty.”

  16. #2176
    Diamond
    Reputation
    485
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    6,913
    Load Metric
    104113730
    What is the deal with el gallo? He is of hispanic descent??

     
    Comments
      
      El Gallo: Spot on

  17. #2177
    Photoballer 4Dragons's Avatar
    Reputation
    2687
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    Detroit
    Posts
    10,648
    Load Metric
    104113730
    Wait for it...

  18. #2178
    Photoballer 4Dragons's Avatar
    Reputation
    2687
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    Detroit
    Posts
    10,648
    Load Metric
    104113730
    Romanian hacker Guccifer: I breached Clinton server, 'it was easy'

    EXCLUSIVE: The infamous Romanian hacker known as “Guccifer,” speaking exclusively with Fox News, claimed he easily – and repeatedly – breached former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s personal email server in early 2013.

    "For me, it was easy ... easy for me, for everybody," Marcel Lehel Lazar, who goes by the moniker "Guccifer," told Fox News from a Virginia jail where he is being held.
    Guccifer’s potential role in the Clinton email investigation was first reported by Fox News last month. The hacker subsequently claimed he was able to access the server – and provided extensive details about how he did it and what he found – over the course of a half-hour jailhouse interview and a series of recorded phone calls with Fox News. Fox News could not independently confirm Lazar’s claims.
    The former secretary of state’s server held nearly 2,200 emails containing information now deemed classified, and another 22 at the “Top Secret” level.
    The 44-year-old Lazar said he first compromised Clinton confidant Sidney Blumenthal's AOL account, in March 2013, and used that as a stepping stone to the Clinton server. He said he accessed Clinton’s server “like twice,” though he described the contents as “not interest[ing]” to him at the time.
    “I was not paying attention. For me, it was not like the Hillary Clinton server, it was like an email server she and others were using with political voting stuff," Guccifer said.
    2016 Election Headquarters
    The latest headlines on the 2016 elections from the biggest name in politics. See Latest Coverage →


    The hacker spoke freely with Fox News from the detention center in Alexandria, Va., where he’s been held since his extradition to the U.S. on federal charges relating to other alleged cyber-crimes. Wearing a green jumpsuit, Lazar was relaxed and polite in the monitored secure visitor center, separated by thick security glass.
    In describing the process, Lazar said he did extensive research on the web and then guessed Blumenthal’s security question. Once inside Blumenthal's account, Lazar said he saw dozens of messages from the Clinton email address.
    Asked if he was curious about the address, Lazar merely smiled. Asked if he used the same security question approach to access the Clinton emails, he said no – then described how he allegedly got inside.
    “For example, when Sidney Blumenthal got an email, I checked the email pattern from Hillary Clinton, from Colin Powell from anyone else to find out the originating IP. … When they send a letter, the email header is the originating IP usually,” Lazar explained.
    He said, “then I scanned with an IP scanner."
    Lazar emphasized that he used readily available web programs to see if the server was “alive” and which ports were open. Lazar identified programs like netscan, Netmap, Wireshark and Angry IP, though it was not possible to confirm independently which, if any, he used.
    In the process of mining data from the Blumenthal account, Lazar said he came across evidence that others were on the Clinton server.
    "As far as I remember, yes, there were … up to 10, like, IPs from other parts of the world,” he said.
    With no formal computer training, he did most of his hacking from a small Romanian village.
    Lazar said he chose to use "proxy servers in Russia," describing them as the best, providing anonymity.
    Cyber experts who spoke with Fox News said the process Lazar described is plausible.The federal indictment Lazar faces in the U.S. for cyber-crimes specifically alleges he used "a proxy server located in Russia" for the Blumenthal compromise.
    Each Internet Protocol (IP) address has a unique numeric code, like a phone number or home address. The Democratic presidential front-runner’s home-brew private server was reportedly installed in her home in Chappaqua, N.Y., and used for all U.S. government business during her term as secretary of state.
    Former State Department IT staffer Bryan Pagliano, who installed and maintained the server, has been granted immunity by the Department of Justice and is cooperating with the FBI in its ongoing criminal investigation into Clinton’s use of the private server. An intelligence source told Fox News last month that Lazar also could help the FBI make the case that Clinton’s email server may have been compromised by a third party.
    Asked what he would say to those skeptical of his claims, Lazar cited “the evidence you can find in the Guccifer archives as far as I can remember."
    Writing under his alias Guccifer, Lazar released to media outlets in March 2013 multiple exchanges between Blumenthal and Clinton. They were first reported by the Smoking Gun.
    It was through the Blumenthal compromise that the Clintonemail.com accounts were first publicly revealed.
    As recently as this week, Clinton said neither she nor her aides had been contacted by the FBI about the criminal investigation. Asked whether the server had been compromised by foreign hackers, she told MSNBC on Tuesday, “No, not at all.”
    Recently extradited, Lazar faces trial Sept. 12 in the Eastern District of Virginia. He has pleaded not guilty to a nine-count federal indictment for his alleged hacking crimes in the U.S. Victims are not named in the indictment but reportedly include Colin Powell, a member of the Bush family and others including Blumenthal.
    Lazar spoke extensively about Blumenthal’s account, noting his emails were “interesting” and had information about “the Middle East and what they were doing there.”
    After first writing to the accused hacker on April 19, Fox News accepted two collect calls from him, over a seven-day period, before meeting with him in person at the jail. During these early phone calls, Lazar was more guarded.
    After the detention center meeting, Fox News conducted additional interviews by phone and, with Lazar's permission, recorded them for broadcast.
    While Lazar's claims cannot be independently verified, three computer security specialists, including two former senior intelligence officials, said the process described is plausible and the Clinton server, now in FBI custody, may have an electronic record that would confirm or disprove Guccifer’s claims.
    "This sounds like the classic attack of the late 1990s. A smart individual who knows the tools and the technology and is looking for glaring weaknesses in Internet-connected devices," Bob Gourley, a former chief technology officer (CTO) for the Defense Intelligence Agency, said.
    Gourley, who has worked in cybersecurity for more than two decades, said the programs cited to access the server can be dual purpose. "These programs are used by security professionals to make sure systems are configured appropriately. Hackers will look and see what the gaps are, and focus their energies on penetrating a system," he said.
    Cybersecurity expert Morgan Wright observed, "The Blumenthal account gave [Lazar] a road map to get to the Clinton server. ... You get a foothold in one system. You get intelligence from that system, and then you start to move."
    In March, the New York Times reported the Clinton server security logs showed no evidence of a breach. On whether the Clinton security logs would show a compromise, Wright made the comparison to a bank heist: "Let’s say only one camera was on in the bank. If you don‘t have them all on, or the right one in the right locations, you won’t see what you are looking for.”
    Gourley said the logs may not tell the whole story and the hard drives, three years after the fact, may not have a lot of related data left. He also warned: "Unfortunately, in this community, a lot people make up stories and it's hard to tell what's really true until you get into the forensics information and get hard facts.”
    For Lazar, a plea agreement where he cooperates in exchange for a reduced sentence would be advantageous. He told Fox News he has nothing to hide and wants to cooperate with the U.S. government, adding that he has hidden two gigabytes of data that is “too hot” and “it is a matter of national security.”
    In early April, at the time of Lazar’s extradition from a Romanian prison where he already was serving a seven-year sentence for cyber-crimes, a former senior FBI official said the timing was striking.
    “Because of the proximity to Sidney Blumenthal and the activity involving Hillary’s emails, [the timing] seems to be something beyond curious,” said Ron Hosko, former assistant director of the FBI’s Criminal Investigative Division from 2012-2014.
    The FBI offered no statement to Fox News.
    There was no immediate response from the Clinton campaign.

  19. #2179
    Diamond
    Reputation
    485
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    6,913
    Load Metric
    104113730
    Well el gallo, i personally dont think we are actually going to deport everyone, but if we do, sorry ur ppl should have followed the rules. We need to cover our ass and make aggresive moves if we still want to be #1 superpower. If we wait to long to get our shit together, were gonna have to get REALLY aggresive to show the rest of the world who's boss, if ya know what i mean.

     
    Comments
      
      The_Lurker: Merika
      
      Pooh: offset
      
      rum dick: post made no sense and sounded hella insecure. sorry to neg you but america aint insecure bro

  20. #2180
    Plutonium sonatine's Avatar
    Reputation
    7653
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    36,162
    Load Metric
    104113730
    Re Hillary's email server:


     
    Literally no one cares and it's not going to mean anything to anyone except the people paid to say it on the news and the people desperate for something to hurt Hillary.

     
    Comments
      
      MumblesBadly: [spoiler]:this[/spoiler]
      
      Jayjami: 100% correct.
    "Birds born in a cage think flying is an illness." - Alejandro Jodorowsky

    "America is not so much a nightmare as a non-dream. The American non-dream is precisely a move to wipe the dream out of existence. The dream is a spontaneous happening and therefore dangerous to a control system set up by the non-dreamers." -- William S. Burroughs

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Who's your favorite US President?
    By Steve-O in forum Flying Stupidity
    Replies: 39
    Last Post: 12-24-2024, 10:56 AM
  2. JFK never should have been President
    By Dan Druff in forum Flying Stupidity
    Replies: 130
    Last Post: 06-19-2016, 02:08 AM
  3. Replies: 60
    Last Post: 03-11-2016, 07:08 AM
  4. Want to run for president? Check this first.
    By BetCheckBet in forum Flying Stupidity
    Replies: 22
    Last Post: 02-29-2016, 04:15 PM
  5. Who do you want for President?
    By Pooh in forum Flying Stupidity
    Replies: 174
    Last Post: 10-29-2012, 02:30 AM

Tags for this Thread