Blazers +9 is a 60% play
Blazers +9 is a 60% play
Ha that is good enough for me. Gl
Rodgers getting his shit pushed in today.
Arizona looking Super Bowl bound if they continue to play on this level.
Love it, 3x betOriginally Posted by IAmProfessionalTalk
It's hilarious that we as a society think everyone can be a dr, a lawyer, an engineer. Some people are just fucking stupid. Why can't we just accept that?
Love it, 3x bet
Should have splashed that moneyline, Portland wins
It's hilarious that we as a society think everyone can be a dr, a lawyer, an engineer. Some people are just fucking stupid. Why can't we just accept that?
Game moneyline was pretty much the only exposure I didn't have on POR. I was loaded up on 1H pk +235 which they led most of before fucking it off by 2. 1Q, 1H and FT sides all cashed easily. Good result.
Should have splashed that moneyline, Portland wins
Bengals +4.5 -115 wins 58%
Spurs -14
Jazz -10
Capitals -1
Wild -1
Canucks ML 130
Avalanche ML 165
Canucks -1.5 +345 small
Avalanche -1.5 +420 small
BOL!!
With Mccarron throwing today and the fact he got picked off for 6 to a shitty Pitt D, this bet against the Denver Defense who is pissed off about last week might pay off...
$10.00 $250.00 Pending 12/28/15 8:25pm NFL Props Football 3745 First score a DEN defense/spec.teams TD +2500* vs Any other score first
Where do you get your calculation? How often are they correct?
I saw the replies to my 'post game' analysis. Hates gunna hate. What you think I was lying?
Tonight I like Denver -4.5 but not terribly in love with this pick.
Last edited by ThisGuyisWhat; 01-23-2016 at 02:42 PM.
I was hating on you?Where do you get your calculation? How often are they correct?
I saw the replies to my 'post game' analysis. Hates gunna hate. What you think I was lying?
Tonight I like Denver -4.5 but not terribly in love with this pick.
My numbers are derived from models and the market. They're correct often enough that I've been doing this as a full-time occupation for 10 years.
AJ McCarron is looking pretty impressive so far! I like it.
Absolutely love the NBA plays although you could have gotten better prices.
I was not referring to you or hating on your 'model'. Just asking.I was hating on you?
My numbers are derived from models and the market. They're correct often enough that I've been doing this as a full-time occupation for 10 years.
Last edited by ThisGuyisWhat; 01-23-2016 at 02:39 PM.
Shanked ... sickening I have cinci and under
I needed 41 4th Qtr points for the Utah over. I miss it by 11. How is that possible, two NBA teams score 30 total points in a quarter combined?
I was looking at a 5-1 night, have to settle for 4-2 or maybe 3-2-1 if Den gets an OT TD.....
It's hilarious that we as a society think everyone can be a dr, a lawyer, an engineer. Some people are just fucking stupid. Why can't we just accept that?
-)
That was a great sweat
let's keep trolling this guy, maybe he will stop posting winning plays
well, that was an ugly way to lose an over...
oh well
Dunno why anyone would pick the over. There were too many identifying factors saying the under.
There are currently 6 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 6 guests)
Reply With Quote
