Why didn't you bet me without juice?Originally Posted by Sanlmar
Why didn't you bet me without juice?
I should have waited cause I locked it in at Carolina +11.5. If the line moves more I might do something with this game later.
I missed your challenge.
Just as well. I don't want to crush that fragile self esteem by facilitating your dubious decision making
and questionable morals.
It's only cause I care. 'Sides, haven't I caused enough damage? **cough** Amaya **cough**
I saw your advice but not the offer to wager
NBA:
Indiana -6 at Philly - I will typically fire any game with a small-to-medium spread against the 76ers, because they are awful. The Pacers are not good, but they've improved their offense in recent games (which is why I'm not taking the under), and they're 7-4 in their last 11. While a number of those wins were against weak teams, all of those squads were better than the 76ers. I think Philly will have a letdown right after their surprise win against Brooklyn.
Detroit -5.5 vs. Brooklyn - In this battle of teams coming off disappointing losses from the day before, there's a strong difference between the two. Detroit has been shockingly good since dropping Josh Smith, winning 5 in a row and almost coming back from 20 down against a great Atlanta Hawks team. Brooklyn... well, they just blew a lead at home against Philadelphia, and have dropped 4 in a row. Honestly, Brooklyn is the worst 16-20 team I've seen in a long time. Like Sacramento, they are far worse than their record indicates. I like the new-look Pistons here for just 5.5 at home.
Milwaukee +7 -105 at Chicago: The Bulls are one of the NBA's most inconsistent teams. Their 25-12 record is virtually tied with East powerhouse Toronto, but the Bulls have a habit of playing inexplicably poorly on a semi-regular basis. They're coming off blowout losses against Utah and Washington. Two weeks ago, they lost to Brooklyn. They barely escaped a recent game at home versus the weak Celtics, winning in OT. They are also just 11-7 at home. Milwaukee has a middling 20-18 record, but they're amazingly good at not getting blown out. They have not lost by more than 7 points since December 9! Therefore, I am going with the Bucks here to at least keep it close.
LOL Pats off to a great start.
#fadethepats
Slava Ukraini!
Glad I stayed away from betting that under 48 I was thinking about taking. Baltimore is having it their way like BK on offense.
17 total yards rushing and Pats are in it.
Amazing. Brady is still god.
Never foresaw a shootout.
tight under sanlmar lollercaust
Bet on all 3 of my picks at the lines posted.
Since then, all 3 got worse, not just on Bovada, but everywhere.
So I got in at the right time, and apparently the public likes all 3 picks.
We will see.
eh, i think the best this scam newton line will be is 13.5 but it seems pretty stuck on 13.
LOL Ravens not fair catching on that punt when they could get two plays off if they did.
Carolina +13.5 is what I can get which I wish I didn't bet last night at +11.5 but oh well.
Or you can just take Carolina +519 ML and burn money that way.
Derrick Rose to miss the game today against the Bucks.
Also how did the Ravens waste a timeout too. Idiots.
But my Pats live to see another day. I'd prefer Denver.
Took over first half and won and halftime pats -7. 2-0. Didn't touch this Seattle game. Maybe something at halftime.
Maybe tail druff milwaukee bet.
Edit: nevermind. Didn't realize what time it was. Or that milwaukee is down 10 early.
Just made a double bet by firing Pacers -2.5 at 2nd half.
They're up by 6.
this is just for me but uhh hey druff are you really sweating a pacers game over nfl playoffs?
Boy the Pacers look horrendous in the 2nd half.
Getting the ball stolen repeatedly, missing shots, etc.
Can't believe I have a double bet on these clowns.
yup he is
Damn Pistons game just now. I put a small bet on it and Jennings missed 4 free throws in the last minute along with giving up a layup at the very last second to get backdoored. This reminds me why I never bet the retarded ass NBA.
There are currently 5 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 5 guests)
Reply With Quote
