Originally Posted by abrown83
My dick is gonna be so raw.
My dick is gonna be so raw.
The screencaps I've seen so far show her sucking a 3-inch penis, getting a facial, and fingering her ass.
My dick is gonna be so raw.
The screencaps I've seen so far show her sucking a 3-inch penis, getting a facial, and fingering her ass.
Sonatine, admit I'm right.
It's hilarious that you clowns are jumping for joy over seeing this bitch naked. Can you not see the writing on the wall? How can't you? How dumb are you?
Millions of women are going to be in an uproar over this. Not in an uproar over unrestricted government access to everything in their life... but an uproar over the thought of guys, similar to the guys thrilled about this travesty in this thread, seeing their pussies and their personal information being put out there.
With this one move we have every fan girl of Jennifer Lawrence's faux-rebellious antics plus almost any other 18-40 year old female falling right in line and supporting the restrictions to come. This is such a genius move by the government that I have to give them props. They really couldn't have picked a better actress either. If I was even 1 percent as smart and organized as these guys I'd have a billion dollar bank account and probably own land the size of Rhode Island and have thousands of people working for me.
So now they have half the population almost with this move. Almost every woman possible.
So whose left? The guys.
My prediction is that in the next month or two many men who aren't computer geniuses will be taken hard and the media will play it up huge. There will be stories about millionaires and smaller business type men who have their databases compromised or worse. Like their entire life's work will be taken overnight by hackers and the men will beg for more invasion of privacy the same way that women are about to when this sinks in for them.
Like even people that deny the involvement of the elite in 9/11 to this day who couldn't possibly fathom them sacrificing life for a more important agenda should be able to see this for what it is.
Also this pretty much seals the deal for a democrat being the next pres. Not like that matters to me because its all the same but now it's next to certain.
The National Security Agency deals primarily with data concerning foreign intelligence and counterintelligence.
Oftentimes companies or individuals act incompetently, even at the highest levels. Grab your tongue with your fingers and say Apple.
We're all just people looking for something to do. There is no script.
You place your own chains.
rofl. Simmer down, fag.
Someone gets it! We will be begging them to shift their concerns!
NSA: "If you faggots hadn't gotten your panties in a twist over the thought of us being all up in your shit then we could have prevented it."
Population: "We're sorry. Please protect me."
Time for another hit........
I believe this is Kate Upton's back and the reason why is if you look at the bed sheets closely in that picture and then look at the bed sheets in the photo of her on the bed with the tie between her tits the sheets are identical with the stripes in them.Is there any proof that picture was her?
The other ones, yes, but IMO she would have to come out and verify that one herself.
That was the largest cum "puddle" in history, too.
I think a lot of those just added a nude picture.
Like the one of Audrey plaza, you have 4 pic's where it is obv her, then just a brunette's beaver shot.
If you can't see the face, you can't say it is them. I don't care if the other 4 of 5 pictures in collage are.
I am just going off that information which for me is enough proof but it might not be enough to confirm that for others who might want to look more in depth to draw a conclusion.
Many celebs will continue on saying these are fake photos and not them. It becomes a he say/she say type of thing where we base our opinions off the information we have available in determining what we feel is real and what isn't especially for bad/blurry images.
If a hacker shows enough pictures that can be confirmed then people will lean towards believing most that get leaked from that source even just back shots are real if they have other confirmed photos to go along with those.
Many pictures have information in the "properties" of the picture file that can help assist people in drawing to a conclusion as well if they have enough details. If one or two photos could be proven with very similar details if the had them then you might be able to determine the others to be real as well. Some of that stuff can be edited though.
You misunderstood me.
Someone gets it! We will be begging them to shift their concerns!
NSA: "If you faggots hadn't gotten your panties in a twist over the thought of us being all up in your shit then we could have prevented it."
Population: "We're sorry. Please protect me."
Last edited by Henry; 09-01-2014 at 07:30 PM.
You misunderstood me.
No I didn't.
I don't get this though.Time for another hit........
I was surprised at how many pics they all had. Are women in their 20's all pretty much taking 3 selfie nudes (or so) a week?
its a collection of basement dweller hackers who have been trading these in various private forums dedicated to these types of shenans for weeks.
and the only interest the NSA has in this is adding the attack vector to their ANT division toolboxes before it gets patched, then building on it to get around the patch.
"Birds born in a cage think flying is an illness." - Alejandro Jodorowsky
"America is not so much a nightmare as a non-dream. The American non-dream is precisely a move to wipe the dream out of existence. The dream is a spontaneous happening and therefore dangerous to a control system set up by the non-dreamers." -- William S. Burroughs
Sorry, typing out loud, I need another hit...........yeah that's right.
If you are real please don't do drugs because of an idiot like me.
That makes no sense. If anything happens as a result of this, it will be calls for increased security and privacy on corporate "cloud" systems. That works against the NSA.
Not everything has to be a big conspiracy.
That makes no sense. If anything happens as a result of this, it will be calls for increased security and privacy on corporate "cloud" systems. That works against the NSA.
Not everything has to be a big conspiracy.
Has this cloud been confirmed as the leak? Admittedly I don't know much about it... but lets say that is where all this came from... Will the public really trust any corporations ability to protect themselves if a company as big and powerful as Apple is viewed as penetrable?
Barry g winning this thread. All his posts are spot on. Sonatine seems dead on with recent post.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Reply With Quote