I had the hawks -1 on bookmaker for 1/3 or the roll ($50), so the win streak continues.
I had the hawks -1 on bookmaker for 1/3 or the roll ($50), so the win streak continues.
I hate to admit it, but I'm starting to like Richard Sherman.
My favorite quote of the day... "Richard Sherman with the interception... He has followers, AND NOT JUST ON TWITTER!!!"
I hope you haven't started planning the superbowl victory parade yet.Originally Posted by tony bagadonuts
Still a long way to go this season and their only Superbowl appearance in 36 years was a loss.
Just sayin.
Neveragain you are 100% correct, but I'm just enjoyin' the ride my friend.I hope you haven't started planning the superbowl victory parade yet.
Still a long way to go this season and their only Superbowl appearance in 36 years was a loss.
Just sayin.
Championships in football aren't won in September, but 1/4 of the season is in the books and the hawks are right where they want to be. Before game 1, I would have been thrilled with 3-1 and ok with 2-2 after the first 4.
Getting that win in Houston was huge for this team, especially missing 3 starters on the O line against that defense.
Tough road game at Indy this week, but I think we match up better with the Colts than with the Texans. Luck may make mistakes this weekend, but he will also make plays and not piss his pants like Schaub did.
Last edited by tony bagadonuts; 10-01-2013 at 01:24 AM.
Not gonna lie I'm glad I don't have to see JJ Watt twice a year. Dude is unbelievable.
The Seahawks win from a historical perspective:
In their 37 seasons and three games before Sunday, the Seahawks had overcome a 13-point fourth-quarter deficit to win three times, most recently in 2003. But they had never overcome a deficit as large as 14 in 105 opportunities, proving there is a first time for everything. These are the largest fourth-quarter deficits overcome by the Seahawks:
Year Date Opponent Deficit Fourth Quarter
2013 Sept. 29 Texans 14 Trailed 20-6, won with FG in OT
1999 Sept. 19 Bears 13 Trailed 13-0, won on Glen Foley TD pass
2002 Dec. 29 Chargers 13 Trailed 20-7, won on Lindell FG in OT
2003 Oct. 19 Bears 13 Trailed 17-6, won on Shaun Alexander TD
Two other numbers made the Seahawks’ comeback even more remarkable: The Texans hit or sacked Wilson on 16 of 34 dropbacks (47 percent of his total dropbacks). Wilson had been pressured on 27 of 73 dropbacks (37 percent) in his first three games.
Sherman’s score was the latest game-tying touchdown on an interception return in the NFL’s post-1960 expansion era, according to Elias, which included INT-TD’s on which the subsequent PAT tied the score.
How long are these O lineman out?
Russel Okung (LT) is out another month, Breno Giacomino (RT) had his knee scoped today and is out another two weeks at least. Center Max Unger should return this week.
LOL, I didn't really hear the quote until TJ and I watched the condensed rewind tonight.
Last one, note the shoes. It's pictures like these that really capture the moment, and as a Hawk fan how can you not love Pete Carroll.
Bumped for Willie
Workman like win for the good guys today. Sloppy and weird at times, but never really in doubt. 5-1 is damn good, now we have a very short week and travel to Arizona for a tough division game with the Cards before heading out again on Monday night to face the Rams. This will finish a stretch with 6 of 7 games being on the road.
It looks like the Hawks, Niners, Pack and Saints in the NFC. Nice to see the 'Aints suffer their first loss today, our Monday night matchup on 12/2 will likely go a long way to determining the NFC Champion.
The Seahawks don't just beat you, they beat your fuckin ass and ruin your season.
http://wallstcheatsheet.com/stocks/t...y.html/?ref=YF
fadethecardinalsnextweek.com
Their sample set is-
The Panthers, who are not good.
The 49ers, who should be good but are not.
The Jaguars, who are unbelievably bad.
The Colts, who spotted the Seahawks 12 points and still beat them- and then followed it with a classic let down game. I was in San Diego. It was horrible.
The Texans, who should be good but are apparently terrible.
Three of those five teams you would expect to lose the week after playing the Seahawks because that's what they do most of the time. The 49ers are only above .500 because they've played 3 bad teams. And the Colts you can't include because no ass was beaten.
books were probably shitting their pants for Arizona to hit a last minute TD
I'm kinda hoping the Seahawks win every game until after the game I'm going to Nov 4th. I want to see craziness before & after the game.
You going to that game tbags?
(•_•) ..
∫\ \___( •_•)
_∫∫ _∫∫ɯ \ \
will be crazieeeeeeeeeeeeeness no matter what!
I'm getting pretty excited about going. I never thought I'd hear it but, my wife is almost as excited as me & she's really not much of a football fan.will be crazieeeeeeeeeeeeeness no matter what!
(•_•) ..
∫\ \___( •_•)
_∫∫ _∫∫ɯ \ \
Yep, my dad bought 4 seats in the inaugural season in 1976 and we've had them ever since. The group now is pops, me, my younger brother and 14 year old Tony Jr. It pretty much takes an act of god for me to miss a game.
This is the dumbest article ever. They've beat horrible teams that werent favored to win the next week except for SF. Im not sure who Arizona plays next week but im sure they are a dog and not expected to win. Now if you told me that in Seattles 5 wins the team they beat didnt cover the following week then that has some meaning, but this doesnt. SF did look like dogshit vs the Colts so the real sample size of 1 is correct.
Here is the original article, every bit of which is correct and published before last night's beat down and humiliation of the Cards.This is the dumbest article ever. They've beat horrible teams that werent favored to win the next week except for SF. Im not sure who Arizona plays next week but im sure they are a dog and not expected to win. Now if you told me that in Seattles 5 wins the team they beat didnt cover the following week then that has some meaning, but this doesnt. SF did look like dogshit vs the Colts so the real sample size of 1 is correct.
The challenge of playing the Seattle Seahawks includes facing a relentless defense and trying to stop a running back, Marshawn Lynch, whose nickname is "Beast Mode." But there's also a residual effect that lasts long after the final whistle: Teams that play Seattle are winless (0-5) in games the following week.
Carolina, San Francisco, Jacksonville, Houston and Indianapolis all lost the week after battling Seattle. Every team except the Panthers lost their next game by at least 10 points. Tennessee, Seattle's vanquished opponent last week, plays the 49ers Sunday.
In 2012, Seattle opponents were actually a league-best 11-4 in their following game. But nine of those wins came before Seattle's Week 11 bye, when the Seahawks were only 6-4. Seattle finished the season with five consecutive victories, punishing teams by an average of 26.6 points per game. And the week after those matchups, opponents lost three out of five.
Seattle visits Arizona on Thursday (8:25 p.m. ET, NFL Network). The Cardinals will then have 10 days to recover before they play Atlanta in Week 8.
—Jordan Teicher
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Reply With Quote