Youtube Slot Community and SlotLady

[zealanddonk]

It is obvious that they are monitoring the comments on YT. There are many comments about how people are, "So sorry this happened to you", to "How awful". I wonder how these same people are going to feel when they figure out the entire thing was a set up?

The entire thing was setup because they wanted the bread $$$$$ but not the slutty stigma that goes with selling yourself for money.

Also, obviously the story about them contacting the FBI was made up. They can NOT contact the FBI if they sent the pictures to EZ, the trail will lead right back to them. These 2 will never admit to this - just as they never admitted to Victor being her BF/Husband, whatever the hell he is to her.

Slight disagree: It wouldnt be an offense if they sent the pix to EZ AND told him to do whatever he wanted with them./encouraged a release so they can pivot to OF.

The FBI threat is probably more to "chum" the waters for the simps so they know there is hot porn out there and they'll want to join OF.

Sadly Victor should have shouted "VICTOR LUCK" as he jizzed on sarah's face to really seal the deal.

Who knows, that might be an upcoming clip as it were.

Also, agree with Ms.Fussy, ACA Exposed should definitely contact PFA to arrange script writing and related services to enhance the viewer experience and potential profits from this nonsense.

Finally, updated my signature for this glorious day.

[PositiveVariance]

I wonder if the "Open Relationship" is true, or they made It up because they know they will eventually need more "characters" to perform on film with Sarah to keep the money coming in?

Also, they are in Canada, why are the calling the FBI in the States, unless they know where the offender is?



But how funny is it that they hid Victor, had him behind the scenes from the Slot Lady channel for 3 years to encourage simp behavior, and now these SAME simps are going to pay $50 per month to watch Victor SMASH "their" girl?!?

[Phantom Limb]

I won't be purchasing a sub but I do recommend they spend a little time/money on lighting and makeup. They looked like a couple of shiny junkies in the announcement video.

[Mission146]

What an interesting series of developments. I see a few possibilities:

1.) I do like the theory about the pictures being a 'Leak' rather than an actual leak. It transitions right into the OnlyFans thing perfectly and then you get to play the angle of taking your power back, or whatever the vernacular was. If the pictures were sent to EZ by a third party, and hopefully EZ will comment on this, it would be a stroke of brilliance if they had deliberately played him (harmless enough and his video pays, so he also gains) knowing that he couldn't resist that kind of drama and then they transition it right into this OnlyFans thing. That's some 3D chess right there! This seems like such a perfect segue into creating an OF, as has already been mentioned, and they can do the, 'Taking their power back,' rather than cold introducing an OF seemingly out of nowhere.

2.) On the other hand, perhaps the pictures weren't a leak at all. If this possibility is true, then I'd actually owe EZ an apology for suggesting it possible that he was trying to takedown ACA for his own benefit. What if EZ was in on it the entire time? They could kick him back a little something-something by way of commission on the first flood of OF money AND there's also whatever he makes by way of his video on this. If that's the case, then ACA and EZ played everyone, which is pretty smart, but falls a little short of brilliant considering that simps played themselves when it was SlotLady just by virtue of the fact that Sarah is moderately attractive and also has a vagina.

3.) The third possibility, which I consider a bit less likely...but have to accept in order to be fair...is that these pictures were genuinely some sort of leak. I don't know about this FBI thing; it would shock me if ACA has the FBI on speed dial. Maybe they submitted an online report to the FBI, which I'm sure is easy enough to do, and that's what they mean. Naturally, that doesn't actually mean the FBI will actually investigate it.

I think we have to be fair and accept the pictures were leaked as, at least, an outside possibility. I think there is a little bit in the way of corroborating statements that make this possible:

A.) Sarah continues to deny having ever been an escort.

-The first thing that we note is that Sarah continues to deny having ever been an escort. For the time being, the only thing that has been made public are the Reddit post claiming she was an escort as well as the very pictures that ACA does not dispute the existence of. In an attempt to takedown the ACA channel, if the pictures were leaked, it stands to reason that the pictures could be used as corroborating evidence as to her being an escort...even though nude pictures aren't sufficient to make a person an escort.

-Another aspect that makes her DENIAL of being an escort strange is that they are now creating an OnlyFans anyway. Think about this for a second: Do you guys think the OnlyFans would do better or worse if Sarah were to create the impression that guys could simply pay to fuck her? I would think, if nothing else, Sarah should WANT people to believe that she used to be an escort, unless it's patently untrue and she's offended by the very suggestion.

B.) Again, what would Sarah being an escort actually harm? Sarah and Victor are now, evidently, going to become OnlyFans cam whores, so having been an escort isn't exactly a huge step down from that if it's even a step down at all.

---

In any case, I didn't look at those other pictures because I had no way of knowing whether or not they were volunteered or were, in fact, leaks. Even if they had been volunteered, why would I want to look at them anyway? Don't get me wrong, I guess Sarah's moderately attractive, but I have no particular interest in seeing her nude and I have less than zero interest in seeing sexual acts committed upon her by men. The thought of watching Victor facebang Sarah kind of makes me want to puke a little bit, not going to lie. No offense meant to either of them and I hope they absolutely clean the fuck up with OF---dudes just aren't my thing.

This has all been very weird and I'm glad it's all but over.

I certainly hope all of the simps enjoy paying their $50 and masturbating to Victor pounding Sarah whilst they use their own tears as lubricant given that, since they are actually paying $50 to watch this, they lack all social skills, and consequently, almost certainly haven't been with a woman in any number of years. Not to mention that I somehow know, while they must not know, that's there's better porn available for free.

Seriously. Victor seems like a nice enough dude when he's not in full degen mode, perhaps a bit of a whiner, but nice enough. If Victor can pull that ass, then maybe the guys paying $50 to watch them on OF should get out of the house. If I were single and left the house with $50 in my pocket, I can say that I would be 50/50, AT WORST, to pull some ass that night. It's all about confidence and either having, or being able to fake, a personality.

I do hope that EZ Life will offer some clarification on his opinion of whether or not the initial pictures were a 'leak' or an actual leak. I doubt if he will say he was in on it, but does he think he got played like a fiddle? Meh. The video pays either way, so who cares? Also, does EZ believe and/or have evidence of that Sarah was ever an escort?

Sarah being an escort I still doubt because, in light of recent events, it really doesn't make a ton of sense that she'd deny it, imo.

[The Boz]

As long as Brian Christopher doesn’t start an OF page, I’m fine with this.

But it is the natural next step for Sarah and Vic as their degenerate behavior grows.

[JeffDime]

I would like to thank Mission for another great piece of writing above so I don’t have to be repetitive. Literally agree with everything. Also, wanted to especially acknowledge Zealadonk for honoring this thread with a full break down of the ACA video Chrissy style.

[Mission146]

So I am usually very tight lipped on this forum since many of you have said they read this forum but at this point as I said in my video I REALLY want to be done with them unless something groundbreaking happens. The damage they have done, I don't see them coming back from this unless Vic goes and Sarah comes back. (Which I doubt she wants any part in)

If they go with either option 1 or 2 as you mentioned, I can debunk and prove they are lying...so try me.

In my opinion they will say nothing. He went live the same night of my other video in August to talk about it and dubunk everything I said but they have been live from home since my video and have not said a word. Why? If they were smart (Victor and Sarah) if you WERE smart. You would block every word on all your social media platforms regarding this situation and take the Sister Christopher approach and not mention it. But Victor, since you are such a narcissist and think you are smarter than everyone else. I have a feeling you have something planned and I sit here waiting with baited breathe waiting to hit the upload button on my last video, which will be the final nail I have left for your coffin.

Hmmm...interesting.

This seems really personal for you. No chance of you elaborating, is there? We have you saying the following:

-They are not smart.

-Victor is a narcissist.

-Nails in coffins.

If I had to guess, you won't talk about it, if there's a personal vendetta. Still, they did seem like a really strange choice for a target and drama for the sake of drama never did make a ton of sense to me because they really haven't harmed anyone as far as I can tell.

[Mission146]

I would like to thank Mission for another great piece of writing above so I don’t have to be repetitive. Literally agree with everything. Also, wanted to especially acknowledge Zealadonk for honoring this thread with a full break down of the ACA video Chrissy style.

You're welcome. I'm sorry for the needless post, but I ran out of +REP.

Dan Druff, can you please increase my Rep limit? JK. You might consider it though since I only give +REPs.

[zealanddonk]

Sarah and Victor remind me of Sharon Stone and James Woods in Casino.

Dopey pimp who just has Svengali powers that make no sense.

Given one of the clips is "Submissive Sarah" it could be some D/s relationship gone wrong ala "50 shades of greenbacks going into a slotmachine"

It'd explain his hold on her and her willingness to perform these shenanigans to make him happy.

It'd also explain why they used language around swingers rather than BDSM as well.

If done right they could justify $50/month on OnlyFans but given how Victor seems to only think a day or 2 ahead.......

[PositiveVariance]

I find it amazing, 600 people will watch them play this Beavis and Butthead machine Live at $2 per spin.

Does anyone know what site this is that they are playing on?

[Tariq Reed]

Phantom Limb: "Nice slot, Lady!" Nothing to be ashamed of in this day and age, really. Chrissy is a different story because of his denial and, well, he's an asshole.

This makes the Slot Lady transition to OF even more brilliant and seamless since she doesn't even have to change her username.

[Dan Druff]

Well I gotta say this is NOT a conversation I expected to see here, even as recently as a month ago.

My first impression of Slot Lady was that she was a fairly intelligent, attractive young woman who used these attributes to establish a decently popular slots channel.

After the first "exposure" video by EZ Life, my opinion changed a bit, as it became fairly clear that she didn't seem to enjoy gambling or running a channel, and was more of a secret frontwoman for her boyfriend/husband's channel. Still, I saw her as a fairly normal young Canadian woman who happened to be thrust into the world of YouTube gambling by her degenerate partner.

At no point did I ever see Sarah as any kind of sex worker or porn star. In fact, she seemed quite the opposite to me. Even with some of those bikini pics leaking out from Instagram or whatever, I still saw her as a fairly reserved girl who was just exploring ways to make money online.

The escort allegations really threw me for a loop. It's hard to picture Sarah escorting, from the personality we've seen in her videos. She seems kind of aloof and unfriendly. She can just barely turn on enough charm to be watchable in some of her gambling videos, but if she hates life being a frontwoman in a gambling video, how bitter would she be when having sex for money with gross men in Vegas? Not everyone is cut out for escorting. You need to be able to feign interest in men you find unappealing, and you need to maintain a certain level of friendliness and sexuality at all times, even when you are disgusted. I couldn't see Sarah doing that. She just doesn't come off as warm or friendly at any point.

I'm not sure if the escorting stuff is true. I doubt Sarah put out that rumor herself, but I guess anything is possible at this point.

But what we do know is that she either sent videos of herself blowing Victor to some stranger who betrayed her (why??), or she distributed these videos herself and feigned outrage.


I do laugh at the "active police investigation" and "FBI" claims. You can't make a criminal complaint about revenge porn and then sell videos of yourself sucking dick at the same time. She would get laughed out of the FBI office for this. Revenge porn is indeed a crime, but it will only be treated as such when the person is attempting to maintain a level of sexual privacy. You can't cry "revenge porn" while selling videos of you sucking dick for $50. Perhaps a revenge porn claim can still exist if someone had recorded THEMSELVES with Sarah and distributed it without her permission, but a person distributing a dick sucking video featuring Victor, when they're also selling videos of her sucking Victor, is a civil matter at worst.

I think you guys might be onto something with the leak being intentional. The turnaround from "OMG my video of sucking Victor's dick has been distributed" to "buy my dick sucking Onlyfans videos" is incredibly fast. Like, they didn't even take some time to process the situation, or to let the supposed FBI investigation take place. Instead, they jump right into producing and selling their own porn, and promoting it on their slots channel. Wow.


I also don't believe this open relationship crap. As already mentioned here, I believe that's a story so the simps will feel like they have a chance with Sarah. We've seen no indication this is actually true, and suddenly it's announced (why?) right when they release the Onlyfans page.

And while this is a bit of a stereotype, I find that people in open relationships tend to be fairly laid back and not possessive, for obvious reasons. Victor seems very controlling and possessive, while Sarah just seems kind of perpetually annoyed and bitter. I can't see either of these two being cool with their partner banging other people. Maybe I'm wrong, but the fact that they needlessly informed us of the open relationship is very suspicious. It's not like someone alleged that, and they're responding. Nobody is claiming that -- unless you believe the escort rumors, which still wouldn't exactly be an open relationship situation (it would be one only for business purposes!)


This whole thing is just sooooooooooooo bizarre. We went from an attractive young woman doing a slot channel, to finding out that her friend "Jenny" moderating chat was actually her male partner Victor running the channel, to her quitting the channel and letting Victor be the one on video, to the whole thing becoming a gateway to selling hardcore porn videos of the two of them.

LOL INTERNETS

[Small_Banana]

I find it amazing, 600 people will watch them play this Beavis and Butthead machine Live at $2 per spin.

Does anyone know what site this is that they are playing on?

PartyCasino.com

[Small_Banana]

If the only cock you see on OnlyFans is Victor's, then most likely they are lying about having an open relationship.

[Mission146]

Phantom Limb: "Nice slot, Lady!" Nothing to be ashamed of in this day and age, really. Chrissy is a different story because of his denial and, well, he's an asshole.

This makes the Slot Lady transition to OF even more brilliant and seamless since she doesn't even have to change her username.

The best part is she's an old school coin-dropper slot. I miss those.

[Mission146]

Well I gotta say this is NOT a conversation I expected to see here, even as recently as a month ago.

My first impression of Slot Lady was that she was a fairly intelligent, attractive young woman who used these attributes to establish a decently popular slots channel.

After the first "exposure" video by EZ Life, my opinion changed a bit, as it became fairly clear that she didn't seem to enjoy gambling or running a channel, and was more of a secret frontwoman for her boyfriend/husband's channel. Still, I saw her as a fairly normal young Canadian woman who happened to be thrust into the world of YouTube gambling by her degenerate partner.

At no point did I ever see Sarah as any kind of sex worker or porn star. In fact, she seemed quite the opposite to me. Even with some of those bikini pics leaking out from Instagram or whatever, I still saw her as a fairly reserved girl who was just exploring ways to make money online.

The escort allegations really threw me for a loop. It's hard to picture Sarah escorting, from the personality we've seen in her videos. She seems kind of aloof and unfriendly. She can just barely turn on enough charm to be watchable in some of her gambling videos, but if she hates life being a frontwoman in a gambling video, how bitter would she be when having sex for money with gross men in Vegas? Not everyone is cut out for escorting. You need to be able to feign interest in men you find unappealing, and you need to maintain a certain level of friendliness and sexuality at all times, even when you are disgusted. I couldn't see Sarah doing that. She just doesn't come off as warm or friendly at any point.

I'm not sure if the escorting stuff is true. I doubt Sarah put out that rumor herself, but I guess anything is possible at this point.

But what we do know is that she either sent videos of herself blowing Victor to some stranger who betrayed her (why??), or she distributed these videos herself and feigned outrage.


I do laugh at the "active police investigation" and "FBI" claims. You can't make a criminal complaint about revenge porn and then sell videos of yourself sucking dick at the same time. She would get laughed out of the FBI office for this. Revenge porn is indeed a crime, but it will only be treated as such when the person is attempting to maintain a level of sexual privacy. You can't cry "revenge porn" while selling videos of you sucking dick for $50. Perhaps a revenge porn claim can still exist if someone had recorded THEMSELVES with Sarah and distributed it without her permission, but a person distributing a dick sucking video featuring Victor, when they're also selling videos of her sucking Victor, is a civil matter at worst.

I think you guys might be onto something with the leak being intentional. The turnaround from "OMG my video of sucking Victor's dick has been distributed" to "buy my dick sucking Onlyfans videos" is incredibly fast. Like, they didn't even take some time to process the situation, or to let the supposed FBI investigation take place. Instead, they jump right into producing and selling their own porn, and promoting it on their slots channel. Wow.


I also don't believe this open relationship crap. As already mentioned here, I believe that's a story so the simps will feel like they have a chance with Sarah. We've seen no indication this is actually true, and suddenly it's announced (why?) right when they release the Onlyfans page.

And while this is a bit of a stereotype, I find that people in open relationships tend to be fairly laid back and not possessive, for obvious reasons. Victor seems very controlling and possessive, while Sarah just seems kind of perpetually annoyed and bitter. I can't see either of these two being cool with their partner banging other people. Maybe I'm wrong, but the fact that they needlessly informed us of the open relationship is very suspicious. It's not like someone alleged that, and they're responding. Nobody is claiming that -- unless you believe the escort rumors, which still wouldn't exactly be an open relationship situation (it would be one only for business purposes!)


This whole thing is just sooooooooooooo bizarre. We went from an attractive young woman doing a slot channel, to finding out that her friend "Jenny" moderating chat was actually her male partner Victor running the channel, to her quitting the channel and letting Victor be the one on video, to the whole thing becoming a gateway to selling hardcore porn videos of the two of them.

LOL INTERNETS

I think your first impression can still be accurate; she remains at least reasonably intelligent and moderately attractive. I can't imagine that any of the recent events, or doing OF, would have meaningfully changed either of those attributes. It may change whether or not some people will find her attractive, but she still looks...well...not quite the same, but more or less.

As you stated, she was the front woman. The obvious reason for that is initial channel growth and also to appeal to men who are simps. If there's a conversation to be had, then I guess the conversation amounts to whether or not that is a scam or at all immoral. I suppose, if Victor were the supposed female chatter, then that is definitely deception, but is it deception of a serious enough nature as to warrant being called out? I'd be a very tepid, "Sure, if you really feel it necessary," on that, but if guys think throwing Youtube live chat and Patreon money her way is going to result in her bedding them, then I'd also argue that those guys are kind of their own problem.

More than that, those guys are sort of buying into an illusion, right? Really, the only thing she did was to help facilitate that illusion. I'd also suggest that if those guys weren't going to be dropping the online 'donations' on her, then they would be dropping them on someone else anyway.

I don't want to name any specific channels, but if you had other slot channels that are led by a lady who is actually single, then guys donate to that, literally the only difference is that the lady is actually single. She's still most likely not going to sleep with them. Also, I would imagine that most women would be happy to take any donated money (as well as most men), but I think the primary objective for most of them is just to produce good gambling content.

Also, at the end of the day, those guys did the donations of their own accord. They didn't have to. I just see money going into a non-AP slot machine and, regardless of who the person is, I'm not going to feel the need to donate when my money would, in part, be going to the financial betterment of casinos. People can obviously do as they like with their own money, but to me, it's a stupid spend in the first place.

There's also the question of the authenticity of Youtube content creators, and other creators, in general. People would do well not to assume that everyone is what they present. I'm not always as I present, but then, I don't ask for donations and would refuse any that were offered to me...unless they were going to one of my WoV games' prize pools. For one thing, while it takes something fairly massive to push me over the edge, I have a pretty vicious temper if I get there.

Anyway, to your point, I don't think this was always the plan, or anything. For one reason or another, they seem to be exploring every possible revenue source that they can get. In order to be fair, we must accept the outside possibility that these items were a legitimate leak...unless such is conclusively proven otherwise...but I'm with you that I think this was planned; I just don't think it was long-term planned. I tend to get the impression that Sarah wanted less camera time, not that she wanted the camera moved from her face to her labia.

I'm honestly not sure about the open relationship aspect. I obviously have no reason to care and see it as an aside to the main thing anyway. I guess we will see, well, I won't see, but some people will see if others get involved with their provocative OF content.

The last few statements are basically, "Well, there you have it," for me. I hope that their OF page is successful as I have no reason to hope otherwise. By one mechanism or another, this is what they have decided to do, so good luck to them. I'll leave speculating as to the relationship dynamic between Sarah and Victor for others (speculations that haven't been made public) as anything off-camera and out of the public eye is none of my business.

[PositiveVariance]

I am sure some of you have the same questions for me that Mission had asked Druff...

I will take the initiative and try to address concerns that some may have. I am going to get Crucified for this, but that is ok - I probably deserve it, but more importantly, I feel it is the right thing to do.

Many probably think, What did Victor do to you? You are very negative towards him. Both of these are very fair assessments. If I had met Victor or Sarah out at a bar, I would likely get along with both of them very well.

As Druff mentioned, early on when Victor and Sarah were not truthful about their relationship, it left a bad taste in my mouth. Is this a valid reason to criticize him on a regular basis? No, it is not.

So What is the reason? My entire life when I have seen a business that I feel is doing something incorrect, I feel the need to immediately "fix it." For some reason, an inefficient business drives me up the Fucking wall. I think many people including myself, looked at their channel (business) and desperately wanted to make corrections. Or, is this just a Positive Variance problem? It is obvious,that this is THEIR business, and they have no obligation to listen to anyone's opinions or advice on how to operate their channel.

I feel a few weeks ago, I gave him what was amazing advice on several ways to change their business for the better, to greatly increase revenue. Just to refresh, one of those ideas was too get a very attractive girl, with a bit of personality and make her a partner - The new face of All Casino Action. Now, of course this was JUST MY OPINION. To them, I am just some dude on a forum that criticizes them, why should they listen to me? I felt I needed to criticize Victor shortly after he became the face of the channel, because that is when I felt the start of them "running their business into the ground" all started. Was this ok for me to do? NOPE, NOT IN THIS WAY.

There have been many times that I felt it was appropriate to give Victor some criticism. I think a lot of my criticism involved his Gambling Degeneracy, and I believed this affected the business and caused it to greatly underperform.

Regardless of how I felt about the way he was operating HIS channel (business), I should have not been so aggressive and critical of him in other areas, and for that I WAS WRONG.

Don't get me wrong, there are some things that I feel needed to be brought up and addressed, but here's the thing: This is a forum... We speculate, we criticize, we analyze, we give our opinions, ect., but we must keep it reasonable and respectful to others. (Unless your initials are C.M.)

I don't regret calling him a DEGEN, degenerate, Degenerate Gambler, ect., because this is true, however I didn't need to repeatedly say it. However, in the future I will do my absolute best to try to not have this as well as his business decisions influence anything that I write towards them that may be critical.

Ultimately, I was a bit hard on him, I still agree with my business advice for them, but in the future, I will try to be a bit more respectful, considerate to them and their business and only be critical of them for the issue at hand, and NOT be influenced by their business decisions.


It is still my opinion that they provided the pictures to a third party, to have that person, intentionally release them to the Public. However, I do not believe this is something they could ever admit to, wayyyy to much on the line.

I do have opinions on Sarah, but they will be for later. They may really surprise some people, I am sure another Crucifixion will be in short order.


Chrissy, there is nothing what so ever like this coming for you! You , are the Scumbag of scumbags!

[Small_Banana]

You don't need a good looking girl to have a successful slot channel. The top 3 channels are run by males. The one with the most subscribers is homosexual. I have had friends give money to Victor in person while he was streaming from the El Cortez. They are not Sarah simps, they enjoy Victor's degeneracy and his bitching and complaining.

I believe the reason why All Casino Action is struggling is because they switched from slots to table games. I think most people prefer watching slots. That is why you rarely see the biggest channels playing table games.

[zealanddonk]

early on when Victor and Sarah were not truthful about their relationship, it left a bad taste in my mouth.

Oddly I saw a video just the other day that ended before Sarah ended up with a bad taste in her mouth.

[zealanddonk]

If the only cock you see on OnlyFans is Victor's, then most likely they are lying about having an open relationship.

It potentially hinges on Victor's exact wording: He said he could bang hot chicks, and Sarah had the same priviledge.
Technically that means Sarah can also bang hot chicks.

Not sure that'd be worth $50/month but defo worth something.