Lot of poker players are sick after playing WYNN tournament

[OK2]

Debunk all of this with your 'liberal' sources getting toasted by each passing day you fucking idiot

"You're a nutbag"

No you have a nutbag resting over your eyes you got nothing and you keep ignoring all of these PROVEN LIES

Show me where they're (These sources) lying?

You can't?

Fuck off

[OK2]

A picture says a thousand words. There are graphs of data and medical studies to back up the thesis that the COVID vaccines are causing more deaths and disability overall. Also after a period of time the vaccines cause more COVID deaths.

This was anticipated by the Canadian COVID Care Alliance (CCCA). The Canadian COVID Care Alliance is a group of doctors, scientists and health professionals. The CCCA did a video and a written report explaining the Pfizer trial data on the British Medical Journal (BMJ).

In the 16 and older Pfizer trial more people died and got sick with the vaccine overall. But less people got sick and died with COVID. Reducing overall sickness and death overall should be end goal, not just reducing COVID sickness and death. It is kind of sneaky how the report was written with 2 of the authors from BioNTech, Pfizer's vaccine partner. Nevertheless the FDA should have not approved the 16 and older vaccine.

In the 12-15 year old trial, 12 year old girl Maddie de Garay loss the use of her legs, is wheel chair bound and has to eat through a feeding tube. She was only one of a 1,005 vaccinated. She was hospitalized within 24 hours of receiving the vaccine. Her symptoms were reported as an abdominal pain.



Pfizer has the least near term deaths per vaccination, than Moderna, Johnson and Johnson the most. This according analysis of the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting system (VAERS) done by Steve Kirsch's Vaccine Safety Research Foundation.

This means the trial data of Moderna and Johnson and Johnson is even worse or rigged more.

The FDA has conflicts of interest, and protects big pharma more than the public. For example the FDA wanted 75 years for a full release of the Pfizer Comitnaty data. Comitnaty is the fully licensed version of the Pfizer vaccine. Comitnaty is not sold in the US, because that would void the Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) of the original Pfizer vaccines.

The FDA gets 75% of it's drug related funding from big pharma. The former FDA top commissioner Stephan Hahn is now working for Moderna's venture capital investor. The previous FDA commissioner is now on Pfizer's board. Former FDA deputy director Curtis Wright IV helped Purdue Pharma market the opioids as less addictive. Wright than went to work for Purdue Pharma about a year after he left the FDA.

The Health/Pharmaceutical lobby is the biggest industrial lobby in the US. Medical related expenses are about 20% of Gross Domestic Product (GDP). It's a big racket.

The information in this book is censored by big tech like Google and YouTube. They are part of marketing a new several billion dollar market.

There is hope for the vaccine injured and also early treatment for COVID. Frontline COVID Critical Care (FLCCC) Alliance is a nonprofit group of physicians and scholars is a good place to start. They use drugs and remedies with a proven safety record.

[OK2]

Edward Dowd - www.theyliedpeopledied.com

Endorsed by this nobody, just ignore it.

De Becker has shared his philosophies about prevention of violence in several appearances on The Oprah Winfrey Show, 60 Minutes, Larry King Live, 20/20, The Jordan Harbinger Show, and Sam Harris's podcast, Waking Up. He has also been profiled in Time and Newsweek, The Wall Street Journal, The New York Times, and others. De Becker's first book, The Gift of Fear, published in 1997, was a US number 1 bestseller on The New York Times Bestseller List.[citation needed]

Also in 1997, his firm was hired by Bill Cosby to investigate the murder of his son, Ennis, and the threatening letters his family received after the slaying.[15]

In 1999–2000, he assisted the United States Secret Service in the development of its guide for Protective Intelligence and Threat Assessment Investigations.[16]

In 2008, Oprah Winfrey dedicated a show to commemorate the ten-year anniversary of the publication of The Gift of Fear. In the last year of her show, she dedicated two hour-long shows to de Becker's work in domestic violence.[17]


In March 2019, de Becker, who has worked for Jeff Bezos, accused the Saudi Arabian government of hacking Bezos' phone after the National Enquirer published a story about Bezos's extramarital affair. According to the BBC, de Becker, as Bezos' top security staffer, "linked the hack to The Washington Post's coverage of the murder of Saudi writer Jamal Khashoggi at the Saudi consulate in Istanbul."[19] The Daily Beast ran an op-ed, in which de Becker explained the matter of the Saudi hack in detail.[20] Journalist Brad Stone explored whether the Saudi hack was linked in any way to a National Enquirer article about Bezos having an affair.[21] United Nations Special Rapporteur Agnes Callamard conducted an investigation of the Saudi hack. In a public statement, she referred to information that suggested a WhatsApp account belonging to Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman was used to deploy digital spyware on Bezos' phone, "in an effort to influence, if not silence" The Washington Post's reporting on the kingdom. A United Nations report noted that "the iPhone infiltration occurred from May to June in 2018, when the phones of Jamal Khashoggi's associates, Yahya Assiri and Omar Abdulaziz, were also hacked, allegedly using malware called Pegasus." The UN experts stated: "During the same period, Mr. Bezos was widely targeted in Saudi social media as an alleged adversary of the Kingdom. This was part of a massive, clandestine online campaign against Mr. Bezos and Amazon, apparently targeting him principally as the owner of The Washington Post.

Who are you again?

Chump

[Dan Druff]

And most of the people on the other side are far more tainted by politics. IMO it isn't so much political per se just the left has a different view on how to approach things. A more collectivist approach.

There are many many claims from people on the right so it can be very hard to sort out the noise.

For example, I could easily take a ton of the weird beliefs people on the right had and throw them all under one umbrella. List them all out and talk about "them" as if they all share these same beliefs. I'd bet if you look at clearly conservative media you can find just as many inaccuracies and blind spots in their coverage . It just isn't the cause du jour of liberals to rant on about misleading media.

If you think all those kooky rightwing views should have been engaged with by serious people then that is where we will find no common ground.

I have repeatedly stated for the past 3 years that COVID became too political, and that both sides developed their own partisan, fucked up approach to the whole thing.

Not surprisingly, each side took extreme and misleading positions, which directly contradicted those on the other side. The result was that both political sides were putting out misinformation, which ended up equally harmful, albeit in different ways.

The right:
- Denied COVID was a real problem, and compared it to the flu
- Became overly obsessed with mask hatred, and presented it as a symbol of lost freedom
- Refused to trust the vaccine regardless of the data, and constantly pushed misleading information regarding its dangers and limitations
- Pushed obvious misinformation on social media
- Continues to push the narrative that the vaccine is still causing a massive number of people to mysteriously drop dead

The left:
- Intentionally created unnecessary fear of COVID, especially aimed at the healthy under-35 crowd which was never in any real danger from it
- Tied masking to safety, despite zero credible studies proving the efficacy of cloth masks
- Refused to acknowledge the legitimate risk people were taking by injecting a new, unstudied vaccine into their bodies, while at the same time denying the obvious benefits of natural immunity
- Censored legitimate discussion of COVID issues on social media, because it threatened their narrative
- Continues to push the narrative that COVID is an ongoing and major risk, despite the fact that deaths of people under 65 have dropped to nearly zero

Which side was worse?

Take your pick.

[limitles]

And most of the people on the other side are far more tainted by politics. IMO it isn't so much political per se just the left has a different view on how to approach things. A more collectivist approach.

There are many many claims from people on the right so it can be very hard to sort out the noise.

For example, I could easily take a ton of the weird beliefs people on the right had and throw them all under one umbrella. List them all out and talk about "them" as if they all share these same beliefs. I'd bet if you look at clearly conservative media you can find just as many inaccuracies and blind spots in their coverage . It just isn't the cause du jour of liberals to rant on about misleading media.

If you think all those kooky rightwing views should have been engaged with by serious people then that is where we will find no common ground.

I have repeatedly stated for the past 3 years that COVID became too political, and that both sides developed their own partisan, fucked up approach to the whole thing.

Not surprisingly, each side took extreme and misleading positions, which directly contradicted those on the other side. The result was that both political sides were putting out misinformation, which ended up equally harmful, albeit in different ways.

The right:
- Denied COVID was a real problem, and compared it to the flu
- Became overly obsessed with mask hatred, and presented it as a symbol of lost freedom
- Refused to trust the vaccine regardless of the data, and constantly pushed misleading information regarding its dangers and limitations
- Pushed obvious misinformation on social media
- Continues to push the narrative that the vaccine is still causing a massive number of people to mysteriously drop dead

The left:
- Intentionally created unnecessary fear of COVID, especially aimed at the healthy under-35 crowd which was never in any real danger from it
- Tied masking to safety, despite zero credible studies proving the efficacy of cloth masks
- Refused to acknowledge the legitimate risk people were taking by injecting a new, unstudied vaccine into their bodies, while at the same time denying the obvious benefits of natural immunity
- Censored legitimate discussion of COVID issues on social media, because it threatened their narrative
- Continues to push the narrative that COVID is an ongoing and major risk, despite the fact that deaths of people under 65 have dropped to nearly zero

Which side was worse?


Take your pick.

Viral pandemics are rare enough to be counted on one hand.

Not for a single minute did I consider the Covid threat nor the actions recommended to fight it as politically biased.

The world over, was and is in step with the only people qualified to make such recommendations....scientists.

Americans are lost.

edit. You, not Americans, are lost if you think an elected representative/ furniture store owner is the one to listen to.

[donkdowndonedied]

I have repeatedly stated for the past 3 years that COVID became too political, and that both sides developed their own partisan, fucked up approach to the whole thing.

Not surprisingly, each side took extreme and misleading positions, which directly contradicted those on the other side. The result was that both political sides were putting out misinformation, which ended up equally harmful, albeit in different ways.

The right:
- Denied COVID was a real problem, and compared it to the flu
- Became overly obsessed with mask hatred, and presented it as a symbol of lost freedom
- Refused to trust the vaccine regardless of the data, and constantly pushed misleading information regarding its dangers and limitations
- Pushed obvious misinformation on social media
- Continues to push the narrative that the vaccine is still causing a massive number of people to mysteriously drop dead

The left:
- Intentionally created unnecessary fear of COVID, especially aimed at the healthy under-35 crowd which was never in any real danger from it
- Tied masking to safety, despite zero credible studies proving the efficacy of cloth masks
- Refused to acknowledge the legitimate risk people were taking by injecting a new, unstudied vaccine into their bodies, while at the same time denying the obvious benefits of natural immunity
- Censored legitimate discussion of COVID issues on social media, because it threatened their narrative
- Continues to push the narrative that COVID is an ongoing and major risk, despite the fact that deaths of people under 65 have dropped to nearly zero

Which side was worse?


Take your pick.

Viral pandemics are rare enough to be counted on on
e hand.

Not for a single minute did I consider the Covid threat nor the actions recommended to fight it as politically biased.

The world over, was and is in step with the only people qualified to make such recommendations....scientists.

Americans are lost.

edit. You, not Americans, are lost if you think an elected representative/ furniture store owner is the one to listen to.

Todd -

Seems like a balanced take I don't really disagree with. With once in a lifetime pandemics, I'd rather err on side of caution. I still feel medical system would have completely collapsed for some period of time and likely had a larger exodus of people. Instead more burden was placed on small businesses. I was always more sympathetic to medical establishment because they are directly involved with my well-being.

limitles seems to be underrated as a poster. His approach is rough but in the few threads I've read here in past few weeks he seems like a solid contributor.

[limitles]

Viral pandemics are rare enough to be counted on on
e hand.

Not for a single minute did I consider the Covid threat nor the actions recommended to fight it as politically biased.

The world over, was and is in step with the only people qualified to make such recommendations....scientists.

Americans are lost.

edit. You, not Americans, are lost if you think an elected representative/ furniture store owner is the one to listen to.

Todd -

Seems like a balanced take I don't really disagree with. With once in a lifetime pandemics, I'd rather err on side of caution. I still feel medical system would have completely collapsed for some period of time and likely had a larger exodus of people. Instead more burden was placed on small businesses. I was always more sympathetic to medical establishment because they are directly involved with my well-being.

limitles seems to be underrated as a poster. His approach is rough but in the few threads I've read here in past few weeks he seems like a solid contributor.

It is jolting and hard to comprehend when a deadly global health issue is relegated to bipartisan politics. Luckily, the majority on this planet are not so consumed.

Also luckily, this forum represents a small percentage of American voters. These alternate viewpoints are now in place.

[OK2]

Viral pandemics are rare enough to be counted on on
e hand.

Not for a single minute did I consider the Covid threat nor the actions recommended to fight it as politically biased.

The world over, was and is in step with the only people qualified to make such recommendations....scientists.

Americans are lost.

edit. You, not Americans, are lost if you think an elected representative/ furniture store owner is the one to listen to.

Todd -

Seems like a balanced take I don't really disagree with. With once in a lifetime pandemics, I'd rather err on side of caution. I still feel medical system would have completely collapsed for some period of time and likely had a larger exodus of people. Instead more burden was placed on small businesses. I was always more sympathetic to medical establishment because they are directly involved with my well-being.

limitles seems to be underrated as a poster. His approach is rough but in the few threads I've read here in past few weeks he seems like a solid contributor.

So you take a rushed experimental gene therapy for a low IFR virus for anyone under 60 or not already unhealthy?

You so smart.

[OK2]

Viral pandemics are rare enough to be counted on on
e hand.

Not for a single minute did I consider the Covid threat nor the actions recommended to fight it as politically biased.

The world over, was and is in step with the only people qualified to make such recommendations....scientists.

Americans are lost.

edit. You, not Americans, are lost if you think an elected representative/ furniture store owner is the one to listen to.

Todd -

Seems like a balanced take I don't really disagree with. With once in a lifetime pandemics, I'd rather err on side of caution. I still feel medical system would have completely collapsed for some period of time and likely had a larger exodus of people. Instead more burden was placed on small businesses. I was always more sympathetic to medical establishment because they are directly involved with my well-being.

limitles seems to be underrated as a poster. His approach is rough but in the few threads I've read here in past few weeks he seems like a solid contributor.

[OK2]

I have repeatedly stated for the past 3 years that COVID became too political, and that both sides developed their own partisan, fucked up approach to the whole thing.

Not surprisingly, each side took extreme and misleading positions, which directly contradicted those on the other side. The result was that both political sides were putting out misinformation, which ended up equally harmful, albeit in different ways.

The right:
- Denied COVID was a real problem, and compared it to the flu
- Became overly obsessed with mask hatred, and presented it as a symbol of lost freedom
- Refused to trust the vaccine regardless of the data, and constantly pushed misleading information regarding its dangers and limitations
- Pushed obvious misinformation on social media
- Continues to push the narrative that the vaccine is still causing a massive number of people to mysteriously drop dead

The left:
- Intentionally created unnecessary fear of COVID, especially aimed at the healthy under-35 crowd which was never in any real danger from it
- Tied masking to safety, despite zero credible studies proving the efficacy of cloth masks
- Refused to acknowledge the legitimate risk people were taking by injecting a new, unstudied vaccine into their bodies, while at the same time denying the obvious benefits of natural immunity
- Censored legitimate discussion of COVID issues on social media, because it threatened their narrative
- Continues to push the narrative that COVID is an ongoing and major risk, despite the fact that deaths of people under 65 have dropped to nearly zero

Which side was worse?


Take your pick.

Viral pandemics are rare enough to be counted on one hand.

Not for a single minute did I consider the Covid threat nor the actions recommended to fight it as politically biased.

The world over, was and is in step with the only people qualified to make such recommendations....scientists.

Americans are lost.

edit. You, not Americans, are lost if you think an elected representative/ furniture store owner is the one to listen to.

You ignore the man leading the response was involved in the cause? and his wife was his ethics watchdog?

Drink another bottle and secure your helmet, retarded looking Justin Shronk lookalike (who looked partially retarded himself)

[OK2]

And most of the people on the other side are far more tainted by politics. IMO it isn't so much political per se just the left has a different view on how to approach things. A more collectivist approach.

There are many many claims from people on the right so it can be very hard to sort out the noise.

For example, I could easily take a ton of the weird beliefs people on the right had and throw them all under one umbrella. List them all out and talk about "them" as if they all share these same beliefs. I'd bet if you look at clearly conservative media you can find just as many inaccuracies and blind spots in their coverage . It just isn't the cause du jour of liberals to rant on about misleading media.

If you think all those kooky rightwing views should have been engaged with by serious people then that is where we will find no common ground.

I have repeatedly stated for the past 3 years that COVID became too political, and that both sides developed their own partisan, fucked up approach to the whole thing.

Not surprisingly, each side took extreme and misleading positions, which directly contradicted those on the other side. The result was that both political sides were putting out misinformation, which ended up equally harmful, albeit in different ways.

The right:
- Denied COVID was a real problem, and compared it to the flu
- Became overly obsessed with mask hatred, and presented it as a symbol of lost freedom
- Refused to trust the vaccine regardless of the data, and constantly pushed misleading information regarding its dangers and limitations
- Pushed obvious misinformation on social media
- Continues to push the narrative that the vaccine is still causing a massive number of people to mysteriously drop dead

The left:
- Intentionally created unnecessary fear of COVID, especially aimed at the healthy under-35 crowd which was never in any real danger from it
- Tied masking to safety, despite zero credible studies proving the efficacy of cloth masks
- Refused to acknowledge the legitimate risk people were taking by injecting a new, unstudied vaccine into their bodies, while at the same time denying the obvious benefits of natural immunity
- Censored legitimate discussion of COVID issues on social media, because it threatened their narrative
- Continues to push the narrative that COVID is an ongoing and major risk, despite the fact that deaths of people under 65 have dropped to nearly zero

Which side was worse?

Take your pick.

LMAO

misinformation?

Check out these right wingers.

[country978]

Todd -

Seems like a balanced take I don't really disagree with. With once in a lifetime pandemics, I'd rather err on side of caution. I still feel medical system would have completely collapsed for some period of time and likely had a larger exodus of people. Instead more burden was placed on small businesses. I was always more sympathetic to medical establishment because they are directly involved with my well-being.

limitles seems to be underrated as a poster. His approach is rough but in the few threads I've read here in past few weeks he seems like a solid contributor.

So you take a rushed experimental gene therapy for a low IFR virus for anyone under 60 or not already unhealthy?

You so smart.

OK2 I think you're wasting your time trying to persuade these folks. They can only see things though a political lens and can only respond with political arguments and talking points and name calling while trying to sound intelligent by saying things like "err on the side of caution" without having any respect for those who err on the side of caution by taking a different or opposite approach. As for this poster he goes out to eat with sick people and can't remember last time he wore a mask so what you're really dealing with is a hypocrite simply looking for an argument. If you read what he says its actually nothing of substance without any original thoughts or insights.

I'm pretty sure its just a Khalawat dupe. Dwai would know.

[OK2]

So you take a rushed experimental gene therapy for a low IFR virus for anyone under 60 or not already unhealthy?

You so smart.

OK2 I think you're wasting your time trying to persuade these folks. They can only see things though a political lens and can only respond with political arguments and talking points and name calling while trying to sound intelligent by saying things like "err on the side of caution" without having any respect for those who err on the side of caution by taking a different or opposite approach. As for this poster he goes out to eat with sick people and can't remember last time he wore a mask so what you're really dealing with is a hypocrite simply looking for an argument. If you read what he says its actually nothing of substance without any original thoughts or insights.

I'm pretty sure its just a Khalawat dupe. Dwai would know.

Thanks bro

I literally dubbed myself a schizophrenic shit poster because :internetseriousbusiness

Todd has sunk cost denial bad. The evidence of excess deaths and suspicious deaths and a lot IN YOUNG PEOPLE after the 'vaccine' and the lack of interest in addressing it by the same scaremongering media, government and pharma companies and dr's profiting massively is OBVIOUS.

I'm not citing crazies, they are legit and have no incentive really to go against the overwhelming power of the mainstream narrative, a lot of them took the shots for fucks sake. Just ignored. So many proven lies and attempts to cover up and blatant corrupt conflicts of interest. Can't ignore it forever. I'm done, waste of time.

My antagonistic approach is clearly not provoking any reflection but hopefully it's been entertaining for everyone who doesn't worship the bullshit demigod status of 'experts' who were fucking wrong about way too much not to fucking admit, fucking faggots.

If I made these points his response would have been much different

"The left:
- Intentionally created unnecessary fear of COVID, especially aimed at the healthy under-35 crowd which was never in any real danger from it
- Tied masking to safety, despite zero credible studies proving the efficacy of cloth masks
- Refused to acknowledge the legitimate risk people were taking by injecting a new, unstudied vaccine into their bodies, while at the same time denying the obvious benefits of natural immunity
- Censored legitimate discussion of COVID issues on social media, because it threatened their narrative
- Continues to push the narrative that COVID is an ongoing and major risk, despite the fact that deaths of people under 65 have dropped to nearly zero"

Todd -

Seems like a balanced take I don't really disagree with

[donkdowndonedied]

So you take a rushed experimental gene therapy for a low IFR virus for anyone under 60 or not already unhealthy?

You so smart.

OK2 I think you're wasting your time trying to persuade these folks. They can only see things though a political lens and can only respond with political arguments and talking points and name calling while trying to sound intelligent by saying things like "err on the side of caution" without having any respect for those who err on the side of caution by taking a different or opposite approach. As for this poster he goes out to eat with sick people and can't remember last time he wore a mask so what you're really dealing with is a hypocrite simply looking for an argument. If you read what he says its actually nothing of substance without any original thoughts or insights.

I'm pretty sure its just a Khalawat dupe. Dwai would know.

Such a clownworld.

[OK2]

OK2 I think you're wasting your time trying to persuade these folks. They can only see things though a political lens and can only respond with political arguments and talking points and name calling while trying to sound intelligent by saying things like "err on the side of caution" without having any respect for those who err on the side of caution by taking a different or opposite approach. As for this poster he goes out to eat with sick people and can't remember last time he wore a mask so what you're really dealing with is a hypocrite simply looking for an argument. If you read what he says its actually nothing of substance without any original thoughts or insights.

I'm pretty sure its just a Khalawat dupe. Dwai would know.

Such a clownworld.

You're the juggling faggot!

I'm in my 30's and never voted.