I've thought more about Mark Lamb's claim that Roger Ver owed Coinflex $47 million and wouldn't pay, and Ver's response that they owe HIM money and won't pay.
It's possible that both are true. How?
Recall that Ver basically had his $47 million investment in Coinflex on credit. They knew he was so crypto rich that he didn't actually have to put up the funds to back it. Basically they gave him credit for being good for it, which he probably is. I'm guessing that was also the only way he was going to invest in this project, as otherwise he was opening himself up to get scammed for $47 million.
Recall that Coinflex investors earned interest "every 8 hours". Think of how much interest Ver must have been earning on his $47 million worth of flexUSD.
Well, Coinflex probably chunked off all or most of their assets, and likely could no longer cover withdrawals. At that point, they might have gone to Ver and said, "Hey bro, we need some of that $47 million to cover the withdrawals."
And Ver might have said back, "Fuck no, something is fishy here. In fact, it pisses me off that I can't withdraw the interest I made on my $47 million investment! So fuck off. Not only am I not sending over that $47 million, but I expect you to cash out my interest immediately!"
And there you have it. Both can truthfully claim that each "owes" the other.
Obviously this is all speculation, but I think it's a pretty good guess. They've never explained why they need Ver's $47 million right now if they're supposedly already holding $90 million from others. (They also won't comment on that $90 million, and if it exists anymore!)
Anyway, I think there's about zero point zero chance that Coinflex recovers from this.