
Originally Posted by
Dan Druff
The problem is that police are like doctors, in that they don't like to admit, "I'm stumped, I can't figure this one out", so if in that spot they will often take their best guess and say it with conviction.
Much like a patient doesn't like hearing, "Sorry, no idea here" after they've paid for a doctor's visit, the public doesn't like hearing, "Sorry we can't figure out how they died" when the police are supposed to protect us and have all the answers.
In this case, I think they're stating something factual while avoiding discussing that they don't know the bigger picture. "Heat stroke" can occur after something else incapacitates someone in the 107 degree heat. It appears some mysterious cause incapacitated everyone, and then heat stroke ultimately killed them. That I'd believe, but it still doesn't explain much.
It would be like if I was found dead at the bottom of a lake, and the conclusion was that I died of ingestion of water into my lungs. Well, yeah, but how did I end up there? If the report ended there, you wouldn't have learned anything.
They weren't far from the car. They were all together. Heat stroke rarely affects two people the same way, meaning that one of the two should have been feeling better than the other, and would have attempted to take the baby and get help. There was water left, and it doesn't appear anyone was furiously drinking before dying, which you'd expect if they were suffering from heat stroke.
It really, really, really has the look of people who simultaneously became incapacitated, sat down, and rapidly got worse before dying. As I said before, I think the dad and baby died first, and the mom used what little strength she had to attempt to get herself to the car, but died a tiny bit up the trail.