Seems to me you are really trying to make light of this in a way that favors 4D here, no one in their right mind thinks this guy was photo-shopping Simpson .jpg's, right...Originally Posted by sonatine
ach.. mea culpa possibly. ill have to look into particulars i suppose, eg it may be saying any/all of these are relevant. so the abusive material = yes, distro = no, promoting = no.
also there is a huge difference between contributing to dark web CP dumps and photoshopping x-rated simpsons jpgs, which btw 100% constitutes child pornography under the current statutes and has been prosecuted as such in the recent past.
I'd bet if he was adding content to these places with his ability, and judging by how you all seem to think he was such a talented internet artist, it was more likely of some really perverse things. Feels almost as if a few posting in this thread are trying to in an ever so slight of way create some plausible doubt in this guys situation. I doubt that's how it really is, he wasnt just accused here, he obviously wasn't even able to plea out to a better (lesser???) charge. The State had him by the balls and he had no choice but plead guilty to what he did here. No one rolls over and just takes charges like this, no one. And you surely dont want to end up in any institution labeled as such. Obviously he is guilty as charged, let that sink in here.
Reply With Quote