Quote Originally Posted by Crowe Diddly View Post
Quote Originally Posted by shortbuspoker View Post
My view is that if the ACA is the great piece of legislation that it is supposed to be then the Democrats would accept the budget without funding for the ACA included and then use it as there running platform for 2014 and 2016.
But that's retarded. It already passed. IT's a law now. Why pass a law, then agree to un-pass it and give it another shot in a few years? That's about the most backward thing in the world, and nobody in any party in any government anywhere would accept such an idea.

Can you justify your view in any half decent manner at all? Give it a shot, because I'd love to hear a defense of it. Like, I don't honestly believe you think that's a good idea, do you? As hard as it was to pass, you think they should now table their laws for a few, because conciliation or something? That's nonsensical in every single respect.
The Congress that passed the law was not this Congress. When the makeup of Congress changes, so reflects the will of the voters that put them there. If the election would have overturned the Senate as well, we wouldn't even be having this discussion because the law would be killed dead in its tracks. The dems decided to make this a completely one sided political issue in the way they pursued and passed the law, and now the right will play it in a like manner. I can only guess that when the repubs take back the executive branch that every member of the media will be audited by the IRS, have the democratic members of the House wiretapped and extorted with the info for their votes. Naw, that could never happen, not in America.