I have an interesting cross-section of people on my Facebook friends list, many of whom have their own pet issues that they tend to obsess over.
One such friend (whom I actually like, btw) is a female in the video gaming industry, so she is focused on the supposed sexism that exists there.
Common complaints from women in the video gaming industry:
- They are not taken seriously at work
- Nobody wants to create female characters in games, unless they are sexy and meant to titillate the male players
- Video games are never aimed at a female audience, even though many women really enjoy playing games
Not being an expert on the video gaming industry, I won't comment on the validity of these claims. Perhaps there's rampant sexism, perhaps there's misogyny, perhaps there's not, perhaps it's being exaggerated.... who knows?
But that's not important here.
What is important is that one particular woman realized a way to make big money from guilty liberals and oppressed-feeling women in the gaming industry.
Anita Sarkeesian is 30 years old. In 2011, she developed an interest in writing about misogyny in video games. Her writings generated a lot of controversy, and her name became fairly known within the gaming community.
Anita soon realized she could make money from this notoriety.
In March, 2012, she started a Kickstarter page to fund a video series regarding sexism in video games. It was called "Tropes versus Women in Video Games". She asked for $6,000, figuring that was about the most she could reasonably ask for to produce such a thing.
Then she had a stroke of genius. The gaming neckbeards who didn't like her quest to change video games got angry, and started sending her hate messages. This made a light bulb pop above her head. "What if I take the actual hate messages I'm receiving, dress it up a bit, and then escalate it on my own? That should really bring in the bucks!"
She posted examples of the "harassment" on her blog, much of which might have been falsified, and her $6,000 Kickstarter campaign netted a whopping $150,000, after an outpouring of money from guilty liberals and women who identified with her.
Unfortunately, even the greats can get too cocky and slip up.
On August 27 of this year, Anita recently claimed that she was receiving death threats. Supposedly these threats were coming from a Twitter account belonging to "Kevin Dobson". Unfortunately, she didn't put a lot of thought into properly falsifying the evidence this time, and she was basically caught red-handed as being behind the Dobson account. Here is a great blog basically destroying her and proving her to be full of shit:
http://www.returnofkings.com/42602/d...gainst-herself
Under fire, Anita then attempted to post a copy of an e-mail she received from "Warhero@aol.com" (lol), also threatening her:
She did a poor job with subtlety and authenticity when likely creating her "threatening e-mail" to present as "proof" to the doubters. Here are the various things that smell bad about the e-mail:
1) It's from "Warhero@aol.com". Uh huh. AOL has existed since the '90s. I guarantee that Warhero@aol.com was taken long before the dawn of the 21st century. So that means it's a spoofed e-mail address. But why make a spoofed e-mail? There are so many free and anonymous e-mail services out there, that this serves no purpose. Furthermore, if you are going to make a spoofed e-mail address just to make a point, it's more likely to be something like "Warhero@Warhero.com" rather than AOL.com. To me, it looks like she was going for a caricature of a misogynistic military guy, and just went with the first thing that came to mind "Warhero@Aol.com", especially with the AOL part being indicative of ignorance and simplicity.
2) The motivation of the e-mail author is nonsensical and over-the-top. Again, it's like someone asked her to create a really cheesy caricature of a super-sexist military guy, and that's what she came up with. He says that she's a greater threat to the country than terrorism, and that he is going to kill her because he "loves his country". Right. Even mentions his father and grandfather in WW1 and WW2. (Side note: His father fought in WW2? How old is the guy making the threats? 75?)
3) The grammar looks weird and intentionally poor (again, along with the AOL thing, to indicate someone simple and unedcuated). However, the spelling is perfect, and he makes sure to properly punctuate words like "that's". Not a single spelling mistake in a letter that is so grammatically poor that it almost looks like broken English. Has all the hallmarks of an intentional masking of writing style.
I would love to see the original SMTP headers on the "Warhero@aol.com" e-mail. I bet it would be rather eye opening.
Anyway, I guess there is a documentary about her coming out, and this will be great publicity.
Amazingly, all of the feminists and nerds are eating this up, and they are ignoring the obvious red flags that a crafty woman is taking advantage of them.