UPS found Tucker's package. Now we get to see what was so important and earth-shattering that Fox News didn't make any copies or scans of it before entrusting it to UPS.
UPS found Tucker's package. Now we get to see what was so important and earth-shattering that Fox News didn't make any copies or scans of it before entrusting it to UPS.
SOBCHAK SECURITY 213-799-7798
PRESIDENT JOSEPH R. BIDEN JR., THE GREAT AND POWERFUL
there's plenty of reasons to believe that most if not all polls are incorrect. everything we see on the internet and are told by the msm just doesn't pass the smell test.Originally Posted by BiffCo99
have to have faith that the polls are worse and further off than imagined. you know they're off regardless, and against trump. so it's really not that far fetched that they are off by even more than anyone believes. you simply cannot believe or put much faith in the media and partisan polls to tell the truth.
biden, dems and the media could easily be pushing dogshit AA tranches worth 1/3 of their value
Last edited by mulva; 10-29-2020 at 02:47 PM.
looking for action on Biden in Florida
+ 135
If anyone is interested LMK
lol this piece of shit got WRECKED
Imagine voting for this piece of shit
Georgia's GOP Senator Gets Dismantled In Debate
He's already decided not to show up for the last one.
LOL
It's the end of the line for Perdon't
SOBCHAK SECURITY 213-799-7798
PRESIDENT JOSEPH R. BIDEN JR., THE GREAT AND POWERFUL
Well well well, further confirmation that the whole Hunter Biden story is MADE UP by lying Republican thugs.
https://www.nbcnews.com/tech/securit...eluge-n1245387
If there's no actual scandal, make one up! The cultists will swallow it like Melania swallowed filthy loads from Trump's microdick right up to the day she signed her prenup.The author of the document, a self-identified Swiss security analyst named Martin Aspen, is a fabricated identity, according to analysis by disinformation researchers, who also concluded that Aspen's profile picture was created with an artificial intelligence face generator. The intelligence firm that Aspen lists as his previous employer said that no one by that name had ever worked for the company and that no one by that name lives in Switzerland, according to public records and social media searches.
One of the original posters of the document, a blogger and professor named Christopher Balding, took credit for writing parts of it when asked about it and said Aspen does not exist.
Any more fake scandals that a 5 year old can debunk, Orange Cuck lovers?
SOBCHAK SECURITY 213-799-7798
PRESIDENT JOSEPH R. BIDEN JR., THE GREAT AND POWERFUL
If the whole thing is made up, why isn't Biden denying it?
If I accused you or your son of being involved in nefarious e-mails which didn't exist, wouldn't the first response be a denial and a challenge to prove it?
How come we're not getting that from the Biden camp?
You do realize that certain details of discovery might be fudged (such as the laptop story) while the information found was correct, right?
Reminds me of the argument four years ago that we shouldn't care about the Hillary cheating Bernie thing, because it came from Russian hackers. Not that the info wasn't true, but that the source of the info was foreign, so we should ignore it.
LOL DEMOCRATS
It's so stupid it's not worth replying to. It would give it undeserved attention outside the right wings fake news echo chamber.
If the whole thing is made up, why isn't Biden denying it?
If I accused you or your son of being involved in nefarious e-mails which didn't exist, wouldn't the first response be a denial and a challenge to prove it?
How come we're not getting that from the Biden camp?
You do realize that certain details of discovery might be fudged (such as the laptop story) while the information found was correct, right?
Reminds me of the argument four years ago that we shouldn't care about the Hillary cheating Bernie thing, because it came from Russian hackers. Not that the info wasn't true, but that the source of the info was foreign, so we should ignore it.
LOL DEMOCRATS
Is there a triple facepalm smiley? We need one.
SOBCHAK SECURITY 213-799-7798
PRESIDENT JOSEPH R. BIDEN JR., THE GREAT AND POWERFUL
nobody cares about Hunter fucking Biden
If the whole thing is made up, why isn't Biden denying it?
If I accused you or your son of being involved in nefarious e-mails which didn't exist, wouldn't the first response be a denial and a challenge to prove it?
How come we're not getting that from the Biden camp?
You do realize that certain details of discovery might be fudged (such as the laptop story) while the information found was correct, right?
Reminds me of the argument four years ago that we shouldn't care about the Hillary cheating Bernie thing, because it came from Russian hackers. Not that the info wasn't true, but that the source of the info was foreign, so we should ignore it.
LOL DEMOCRATS
There's 2 sane ways to handle any compromised material from a legal/public view standpoint. You either always deny regardless or you never take any stand.
If the whole thing is made up, why isn't Biden denying it?
If I accused you or your son of being involved in nefarious e-mails which didn't exist, wouldn't the first response be a denial and a challenge to prove it?
How come we're not getting that from the Biden camp?
You do realize that certain details of discovery might be fudged (such as the laptop story) while the information found was correct, right?
Reminds me of the argument four years ago that we shouldn't care about the Hillary cheating Bernie thing, because it came from Russian hackers. Not that the info wasn't true, but that the source of the info was foreign, so we should ignore it.
LOL DEMOCRATS
If you ever say something isn't true, but do not comment on other times, it could be then read as true.
There is no benefit in saying that compromised material isn't true. If you're willing to lie, that's just another thing you can get caught from.
If Hunter Biden was your lawyer, he would tell you the same.
Last edited by gimmick; 10-29-2020 at 06:28 PM.
Shocker
Perdue says he won't attend final Georgia Senate debate, after heated clash at previous meetup with Ossoff
https://www.cnn.com/2020/10/29/polit...due/index.html
LOL @ SHILLING FOR OSSOFF, guy is a disgusting political robot, kill yourselves
Yes, it's true that the CIA, NSA and other U.S. intelligence agencies are now working overtime to sabotage Trump and ensure a Joe Biden Presidency.
Is that reason enough to vote for Trump?
Nope.
Evidence?
SOBCHAK SECURITY 213-799-7798
PRESIDENT JOSEPH R. BIDEN JR., THE GREAT AND POWERFUL
This isn't court. It's the court of public opinion.There's 2 sane ways to handle any compromised material from a legal/public view standpoint. You either always deny regardless or you never take any stand.
If you ever say something isn't true, but do not comment on other times, it could be then read as true.
There is no benefit in saying that compromised material isn't true. If you're willing to lie, that's just another thing you can get caught from.
If Hunter Biden was your lawyer, he would tell you the same.
HUGE difference
When someone is accused and comes forth with a strong denial and challenges the accuser to prove it, people start to wonder if it's true -- especially if the source seems sketchy.
If the accused hides from it and won't answer -- even when it becomes a major news story -- then it looks true.
It's similar when people were accused of being gay, pre-2010. If they answered, "No, I'm not gay. Those rumors are incorrect", you think there's a decent chance they're being falsely accused. If the answer was, "My sexuality is none of anyone's business", you'd know 100% they were gay. You wouldn't answer the latter if you were straight -- at least not pre-2010 when being gay could be a detriment to your career as a celebrity or politician.
Here, Biden's people DID give an answer. They ignored the e-mail authenticity question, and simply said that Joe Biden didn't have a meeting "on schedule" with anyone from Burisma! That's a bizarre response. In fact, it's worse than no response, because it looks like they're admitting everything is true, but throwing in something true-but-misleading (Joe Biden's meeting with Burisma took place, but wasn't officially schedule) in order to confuse people.
You'd have to be really stupid or delusional at this point to believe that the Hunter stuff is fabricated. Perhaps the information was obtained in a shady fashion, but the info looks correct.
Reminds me of this one case where a burglar stole a laptop from a house, then turned it on and found the owner's videos of himself molesting babies and toddlers. He eventually turned it in to police. Just because the guy who turned in the laptop was a scumbag burglar doesn't make the molester any less guilty.
Democrats love to focus upon where/how scandalous evidence against them was obtained, rather than its veracity. Similarly, Trump's tax returns were illegally obtained by the NY Times. Should those be ignored too?
It's so stupid it's not worth replying to. It would give it undeserved attention outside the right wings fake news echo chamber.
Is there a triple facepalm smiley? We need one.
Why is this stupid?
Read my above post.
Republicans have been slamming the Hunter thing as their Hail Mary for Trump. While it probably won't work, Biden could squash Trump's small chance of pushing himself over the line by issuing a strong denial and challenge to prove its authenticity.
Instead, crickets.
I hope you're not dumb enough to think this is all fabricated.
You'd have to be stupid or delusional not to take the Bidengate story with a grain of salt especially when it comes from a camp full of convicted liars and a leader who now recognizes he's finished.This isn't court. It's the court of public opinion.
HUGE difference
When someone is accused and comes forth with a strong denial and challenges the accuser to prove it, people start to wonder if it's true -- especially if the source seems sketchy.
If the accused hides from it and won't answer -- even when it becomes a major news story -- then it looks true.
It's similar when people were accused of being gay, pre-2010. If they answered, "No, I'm not gay. Those rumors are incorrect", you think there's a decent chance they're being falsely accused. If the answer was, "My sexuality is none of anyone's business", you'd know 100% they were gay. You wouldn't answer the latter if you were straight -- at least not pre-2010 when being gay could be a detriment to your career as a celebrity or politician.
Here, Biden's people DID give an answer. They ignored the e-mail authenticity question, and simply said that Joe Biden didn't have a meeting "on schedule" with anyone from Burisma! That's a bizarre response. In fact, it's worse than no response, because it looks like they're admitting everything is true, but throwing in something true-but-misleading (Joe Biden's meeting with Burisma took place, but wasn't officially schedule) in order to confuse people.
You'd have to be really stupid or delusional at this point to believe that the Hunter stuff is fabricated. Perhaps the information was obtained in a shady fashion, but the info looks correct.
Reminds me of this one case where a burglar stole a laptop from a house, then turned it on and found the owner's videos of himself molesting babies and toddlers. He eventually turned it in to police. Just because the guy who turned in the laptop was a scumbag burglar doesn't make the molester any less guilty.
Democrats love to focus upon where/how scandalous evidence against them was obtained, rather than its veracity. Similarly, Trump's tax returns were illegally obtained by the NY Times. Should those be ignored too?
You and Eric Trump still believe the story
Same thing applies. Either you don't take a stand or you're always willing to lie.This isn't court. It's the court of public opinion.
You'd have to be really stupid or delusional at this point to believe that the Hunter stuff is fabricated. Perhaps the information was obtained in a shady fashion, but the info looks correct.
Saying that Joe didn't have a scheduled meeting doesn't take any stand in verifying authencity.
Now outside of that, if there was anything that would stick, R's would have milked that shit for months. Instead they slip it in before it can be verified and properly examined out in the open.
The Burisma hack was known at the start of the year. FBI had the data for a good minute. Republican Inquiry found nothing.
https://www.nytimes.com/2020/09/23/u...s-johnson.html
What more could you possibly want?
Trump wins easy end thread
There are currently 4 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 4 guests)
Reply With Quote
