CMONEY BETTING SECTION ON PFA - INTERESTED? COMPUTER BASED PICKS

[Muck Ficon]

So I have been working with some nerds the last few months and worked out a bunch of computer simulations for different sports. We are getting into the 60 percent win rate with a large sample size. I think it would be cool to have an invite only section of the site where I posted the picks for the day and people can bet them if they want. We can also come up with theories and test them. I fully realize programs online exist that do this very thing, but I almost certain I figured out an edge with certain systems. This wont be Cmoney lock of the week where one year I luck boxed 20 in a row. As I said, we are getting, at best, 60-63 percent historically on some systems. The idea is to grind it out and not fire 10k on the first pick that posted. It could very well lose 5 or more in a row.

Anyway, thought I would throw it out there. If not enough people interested no point. I am mostly interested in people throwing out theories to test, plugging them in, and see what we get. More degen heads the better.

Sounds interesting. Count me in.

[tony bagadonuts]

Sounds interesting. Count me in.

Same for me.

Jesus Christ Muck how about that game tonight holy shit.

[big dick]

Also intrested c$

[joseythepussycat]

I'm in too

Eeny meeny miny moe catch a norco by the toe

[vegas1369]

Count me in please.

[The PINO]

Would defo be interested - sent a PM too.

[gut]

iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiinnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnn nnnnn

[Starbucks Spunk Bucket]

Definitely.

[phantom]

Just curious how do you have a large sample size if you've only been nerding it up for a couple of months.

Or do you use historical game results?

[Daly]

I'm interested. In my experience it's a whole lot easier to do this for individual players then it is for a whole team. That's why I'm so Prop centric in my sports betting.

[Tellafriend]

Count me in too!

[abrown83]

I'm interested. In my experience it's a whole lot easier to do this for individual players then it is for a whole team. That's why I'm so Prop centric in my sports betting.

Team historical data has proven horrendously unreliable for future outcomes.

League wide historical data though may be interesting but may also generate only a few betting spots per year. Like 10 plus point underdogs at home for example.

[Charham]

Consider asking your nerds to run short term momentum testing on dominant home teams in hockey. Also short term (last 10 games) road dogs with momentum. Will need to adjust for key injuries in some cases. Obviously pricing is an issue with this testing.

[cmoney]

Consider asking your nerds to run short term momentum testing on dominant home teams in hockey. Also short term (last 10 games) road dogs with momentum. Will need to adjust for key injuries in some cases. Obviously pricing is an issue with this testing.

What you think about this one:

Record 163-93, 63.7%

Postseason or Regular season
the moneyline % is between 0% and 34%
the opponent's previous game margin is between 1 and 9
the team is the Favorite


Smallish sample..

[smiflorida]

I'd like to help out. please count me in..

[Detroit]

In please.

[snake_in_the_ass]

in please

[gauchojake]

let everyone in except for serial fail and verminaard

[Drexel]

Albeit a very small sample size, we have gone 27-13-5 over the last 45 NBA games.

Due to high interest in this Cmoney has asked me to start the vetting process of those interested in becoming part of this.

Please text me at 203-299-2436 (our dedicated number) and state your pfa user name and what qualifications you have and why you believe you should be included in this.

Also in the interest of total transparency, Dan Druff will have to apply and meet the criteria just like everyone else.

GS


ZoD

[Brittney Griner's Clit]

Why the fuck would you want more people in on this if you have it smoked that bad?