Official Mueller Arrests Thread

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by vegas1369

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by DonaldTrumpsHairPiece

Yet we care about this so much why, do we really think without Russia Trump loses, no so who cares, lock her up!

---

I believe at this point if asked that question most people would lean towards the yes side. When anti Hillary Facebook ads are hitting literally the same amount of people that voted then how could any sane person argue that it didn't influence some decisions, and like Buster said, riled up the base to get others to vote who otherwise might not have voted?

Are you really of the opinion that people could not have been swayed by these ads?

---

OMG

before it's all said and done, trolls like me may have to testify before Congress that we are not Russian

People's attitudes about advertising are hilarious and fascinating to me. Everyone thinks they're above it. "Pfft, I ain't lettin' the TV tell me what toothpaste to buy or who to vote for!"

Billions have been spent studying human purchasing behavior, and billions more are spent in advertising every year off the fruits of that research. Tech companies track what color buttons and font styles make you more likely to click on things. Retailers know that your caveman brain is 11% more likely to buy that $1.99 widget than the $2.00 one because it somehow perceives it as cheaper. Even novices like me can run split tests to determine which adjectives to put in headlines to make you click on videos.

But nah, none of that shit works. You're all perfectly rational robots with full access to your subconscious mind.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by SrslySirius

People's attitudes about advertising are hilarious and fascinating to me. Everyone thinks they're above it. "Pfft, I ain't lettin' the TV tell me what toothpaste to buy or who to vote for!"

Billions have been spent studying human purchasing behavior, and billions more are spent in advertising every year off the fruits of that research. Tech companies track what color buttons and font styles make you more likely to click on things. Retailers know that your caveman brain is 11% more likely to buy that $1.99 widget than the $2.00 one because it somehow perceives it as cheaper. Even novices like me can run split tests to determine which adjectives to put in headlines to make you click on videos.

But nah, none of that shit works. You're all perfectly rational robots with full access to your subconscious mind.

---

real talk:

https://www.rferl.org/a/senate-heari.../28831344.html

russia literally organized competing protests on american soil.

the senate just read facebook the riot act btw and nailed a 3 pointer from mid court with something like "in case you have not noticed, cyber war has begun", and 24 hours later im getting bombarded by recruiters asking me to join facebooks security team. that is not a coincidence.

Wait, people actually believe Hillary lost because of Facebook ads?

Who knows? That's really beside the point. Regardless of what party you cheerlead for, are you really okay with a rival nation exposing 100 million Americans to their propaganda?

Anyone who shrugs that off is a retard, and anyone complicit in it is a traitor.

Does this guy have a goiter?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by SrslySirius

People's attitudes about advertising are hilarious and fascinating to me. Everyone thinks they're above it. "Pfft, I ain't lettin' the TV tell me what toothpaste to buy or who to vote for!"

Billions have been spent studying human purchasing behavior, and billions more are spent in advertising every year off the fruits of that research. Tech companies track what color buttons and font styles make you more likely to click on things. Retailers know that your caveman brain is 11% more likely to buy that $1.99 widget than the $2.00 one because it somehow perceives it as cheaper. Even novices like me can run split tests to determine which adjectives to put in headlines to make you click on videos.

But nah, none of that shit works. You're all perfectly rational robots with full access to your subconscious mind.

---

Late to the party bud, I said something like this 50x in the Trump train thread, they don't care, they just keep spewing libtard propaganda as fact

Edit: persuading ppl is the easiest way to win votes and the dems thought rising demographics and persuasion was all they had to do until maybe the world's greatest persuader fked em in the ass

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by SrslySirius

Who knows? That's really beside the point. Regardless of what party you cheerlead for, are you really okay with a rival nation exposing 100 million Americans to their propaganda?

Anyone who shrugs that off is a retard, and anyone complicit in it is a traitor.

---

The Russians have been exposing Americans to their propaganda long before Facebook was even invented. And I don't believe for a second they knew Trump would even be the Republican candidate. I do believe that Putin wanted Hillary to lose. She fucked with him back in 2011.

Anyway, I am concerned with Trump being re-elected to another term and if fucking idiots try and claim Hillary lost because of "muh Russians!" that narrative will most certainly guarantee another Trump term.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by devidee

The Russians have been exposing Americans to their propaganda long before Facebook was even invented.

---

I can't imagine any campaign that would be remotely comparable to this, unless they were running Superbowl ads. What propaganda are you talking about?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by SrslySirius

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by devidee

The Russians have been exposing Americans to their propaganda long before Facebook was even invented.

---

I can't imagine any campaign that would be remotely comparable to this, unless they were running Superbowl ads. What propaganda are you talking about?

---

The entire entertainment industry, the entire publishing industry, secondary education.

EDIT: Oh, and rap.

Are you really letting yourself get sucked into this conversation, SS?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by SrslySirius

Who knows? That's really beside the point. Regardless of what party you cheerlead for, are you really okay with a rival nation exposing 100 million Americans to their propaganda?

Anyone who shrugs that off is a retard, and anyone complicit in it is a traitor.

---

Did u actually see the ads? They look like Russia propaganda. If you are not part of a country's culture and actually understand it, ur propaganda looks like garbage

We are at war with Russia, we must deploy our fraudulent fb likes and our most aggressive Twitter trolls, NO MERCY

THEY WILL GET WHALLOPPED

Sounds like you guys have a bit too much personally invested in this being a non-issue and are doing some mental gymnastics to downplay it.

Wait, people actually think Hillary lost because of Facebook ads?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by SrslySirius

Sounds like you guys have a bit too much personally invested in this being a non-issue and are doing some mental gymnastics to downplay it.

---

The Russians were paying for BLM ads as well NRA ads. It was about sowing division in America.

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/201...ler-probe.html


Nice to see Mueller taking a broader mandate and pushing Pence's goofy shit in too.

So no one else thinks maybe, just maybe, Hillary lost because of shit like this...

https://www.politico.com/magazine/st...ks-2016-215774

(Bitter Bernie Bros, brah)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by SrslySirius

Sounds like you guys have a bit too much personally invested in this being a non-issue and are doing some mental gymnastics to downplay it.

---

It is a non issue, Trump was going to win either way. The truth is the libtards lost to a huge asshole cuz they're annoying AF and no human being wants to admit ppl don't like them so they make up a bunch of stories to explain it away

And now Twitter admits that it was actively trying to help Hillary...

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-1...onths-campaign

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by SrslySirius

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by devidee

The Russians have been exposing Americans to their propaganda long before Facebook was even invented.

---

I can't imagine any campaign that would be remotely comparable to this, unless they were running Superbowl ads. What propaganda are you talking about?

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by thesidedish

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by SrslySirius

Sounds like you guys have a bit too much personally invested in this being a non-issue and are doing some mental gymnastics to downplay it.

---

It is a non issue, Trump was going to win either way. The truth is the libtards lost to a huge asshole cuz they're annoying AF and no human being wants to admit ppl don't like them so they make up a bunch of stories to explain it away

---

That is what I was just talking about. You sound like a defensive Pats fanboy arguing about Spygate. Let's stop fixating on the result for a second. If either candidate won in a landslide, and this propaganda only moved the needle a few percentage points, it's still completely unacceptable.

Examine your biases. Would you be shrugging it off if Hillary benefited from a massive campaign by the Chinese? Be honest with yourself.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by SrslySirius

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by thesidedish

It is a non issue, Trump was going to win either way. The truth is the libtards lost to a huge asshole cuz they're annoying AF and no human being wants to admit ppl don't like them so they make up a bunch of stories to explain it away

---

That is exactly what I was just talking about. You sound like a defensive Pats fanboy arguing about Spygate. Let's stop fixating on the result for a second. If either candidate won in a landslide, and this propaganda only moved the needle a few percentage points, it's still completely unacceptable.

Examine your biases. Would you be shrugging it off if Hillary benefited from a massive campaign by the Chinese? Be honest with yourself.

---

I am a pats fanboy, shoulda seen me defending deflategate

And I'm talking about the libtards been saying for a year they lost becuz of russia, that is not true. And I really don't think propaganda campaigns from other countries have really any difference of affecting actual votes, they only thing they can do i think is make us more pissed off cuz the other sides arguments look dumber than they are but ppl were gonna vote the same way regardless. We have much better American propagandists affecting votes

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by devidee

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by SrslySirius

Sounds like you guys have a bit too much personally invested in this being a non-issue and are doing some mental gymnastics to downplay it.

---

The Russians were paying for BLM ads as well NRA ads. It was about sowing division in America.

---

this is nuts and sadly, it's working

guys the russians basically turned antifa from a handful norcal junkies into a pan-national action group.


contemplate this on the tree of woe.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by sonatine

guys the russians basically turned antifa from a handful norcal junkies into a pan-national action group.


contemplate this on the tree of woe.

---

Antifa is a Mossad op.

So no one has a problem with a candidate rigging a primary?

Sounds like some people have too much personally invested.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by devidee

So no one has a problem with a candidate rigging a primary?

Sounds some like people have too much personally invested.

---

lolwat? Aside from Sonatine, apparently, this seems to be one issue that outraged everybody on both sides.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by SrslySirius

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by devidee

So no one has a problem with a candidate rigging a primary?

Sounds some like people have too much personally invested.

---

lolwat? Aside from Sonatine, apparently, this seems to be one issue that outraged everybody on both sides.

---

MUH RUSSIANS!

wut

How about Obama leaving the Democratic Party 26 million dollars in debt?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by SrslySirius

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by devidee

So no one has a problem with a candidate rigging a primary?

Sounds some like people have too much personally invested.

---

lolwat? Aside from Sonatine, apparently, this seems to be one issue that outraged everybody on both sides.

---

yeah the republicans are just aghast at democrat on neo-socialist violence.


http://i.imgur.com/HsQhLJI.gif

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by sonatine

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by SrslySirius

lolwat? Aside from Sonatine, apparently, this seems to be one issue that outraged everybody on both sides.

---

yeah the republicans are just aghast at democrat on neo-socialist violence.


http://i.imgur.com/HsQhLJI.gif

---

You could have chosen any person at random and I would have voted for that person over Trump. Hell, I voted for Hillary.

None of that will fix how broken the Democratic Party is at the moment.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by devidee

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by sonatine

yeah the republicans are just aghast at democrat on neo-socialist violence.


http://i.imgur.com/HsQhLJI.gif

---

You could have chosen any person at random and I would have voted for that person over Trump. Hell, I voted for Hillary.

None of that will fix how broken the Democratic Party is at the moment.

---

point.

UH OH

Quote:

---

Carter Page testifies he told Sessions about Russia trip

During more than six hours of closed-door testimony, Page said that he informed Sessions about his coming July 2016 trip to Russia, which Page told CNN was unconnected to his campaign role. Page described the conversation to CNN after he finished talking to the House intelligence committee.

http://www.cnn.com/2017/11/02/politi...rip/index.html

---

This directly contradicts what Jeff Sessions told the senate at his confirmation hearing.

There's been reports that on numerous occasions, Trump's handlers have had to talk him off the ledge from giving Sessions the axe. What happens now if he finally gets an excuse to do so, or Sessions is compelled to resign? Only the AG (as far as I know) has the authority to get rid of Mueller. Presumably Trump will appoint one who is willing to do just that.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by SrslySirius

UH OH

Quote:

---

Carter Page testifies he told Sessions about Russia trip

During more than six hours of closed-door testimony, Page said that he informed Sessions about his coming July 2016 trip to Russia, which Page told CNN was unconnected to his campaign role. Page described the conversation to CNN after he finished talking to the House intelligence committee.

http://www.cnn.com/2017/11/02/politi...rip/index.html

---

This directly contradicts what Jeff Sessions told the senate at his confirmation hearing.

There's been reports that on numerous occasions, Trump's handlers have had to talk him off the ledge from giving Sessions the axe. What happens now if he finally gets an excuse to do so, or Sessions is compelled to resign? Only the AG (as far as I know) has the authority to get rid of Mueller. Presumably Trump will appoint one who is willing to do just that.

---

I was reading something about how the whole Roger Stone / Uranium One farce is a very weird legal maneuver to force Mueller to step down. It's possible they let Sessions hang around until they run out of nonsense like that which could, in theory, deprive Russiagate of its momentum and possibly derail it completely.

If it comes down to having the AG dismiss Mueller... would be in Trump's interests to do so? Or would it be another Saturday Night Massacre?

since sessions recused himself, it's technically rosenstein's call to fire mueller, which he would never do. i don't think trump could get another AG appointed if sessions is fired until the investigation is over.

if someone in trump's family gets indicted (kushner or don jr.), however, then i think we're looking at another saturday night massacre. trump will fire rosenstein and every other assistant AG until he finds one that will get rid of mueller

at this point, i really have no idea how the republicans would react to that

Both candidates combined to spend 81 million on Facebook ads, while Hillary's campaign was spending 500,000 a day on overall advertising, yet people genuinely believe that a few hundred thousand dollars spent by Russians swayed the election.

Not Hillary being a horrible cunt embroiled in 35 years worth of scandals, rigging her own primary etc. Say what you will about Wikileaks, but the things I saw shared around most on social media by far were examples of her flipping positions on issues depending on what was popular at the time, Bill and his problems, examples of political corruption for profit, and her being paraded around like Weekend at Bernie's.