Ok. Thanks for letting me know.Quote:
Originally Posted by simpdog
Printable View
Ok. Thanks for letting me know.Quote:
Originally Posted by simpdog
How were the Celts +7 when they have won 13 in a row, and were playing at home?
On pace to go 272 after 1st Q. Good start.Quote:
Originally Posted by verminaard
The books were just trying to give you as much free $$ as they could. I guess if you didn't do so, it was just your own fault.Quote:
Originally Posted by OSA
Best team in the league at home/threadQuote:
Originally Posted by verminaard
Just live bet Rockets -20 -125 for game.
TILT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
As soon as I make the bet Suns on a 6-0 run. Yep.Quote:
Originally Posted by verminaard
Both teams shooting something ridiculous like 70%. Basically if the players literally sat down on the court every time they were on defense the score would probably be lower. Gonna be nice to look back and say I bet the under on the non overtime game that scored the most points in NBA history.
So took my $18 bucks and made $5.88 with the ML bet on Steelers.
Looking for a secure ML bet in the -300 range and Im seeing Saints -375 so we will go with that.
Money Line. $24.12 $6.43
Football - 466 New Orleans Saints -375 for Game
Also, since my parlays been doing good, I think the Rams at +115 is good coupled with Eagles at -220 and if you wanna gamble a bit, Ravens -125.
WINNERS!
last 3 weeks SVP has been 6-2 each week, now 10 over 0.500 for the year...there are dogs and then there are some dogs with fleas...lotta fleas on these dogs, but well why the fuck not...fire at your own risk...
@OREST (+7) v ARZST
@ARK (+12.5) v MISSST
@BAY (+9.5) v ISU
SMU (+12.5) @ MEM
UCLA (+16) @ USC
@DUKE (+6.5) v GT
@TUL (+9.5) v HOU
@TXTCH (+7) v TCU
Stanford Steve agrees with the UCLA pick...
https://vimeo.com/243255074
I feel if you like UCLA +16 you should just bet O71. USC is one of the best rushing teams in the country and UCLA is dead last in rushing defense, and towards the bottom in total defense.
USC is gonna score in the 40s, so for UCLA to cover they are going to have to score in the 30s and game will go over. However, USC could also possibly win 56-24, so betting the over gives you more ways to win if you like UCLA.
My NCAAF picks so far:
Kentucky +21.5
Central Florida/Temple O56
NC State +1.5
Syracuse/Louisville O73
Oregon St +7.5 -110
UL Monroe +37
Florida Intl +14.5
Cal +15
-I also got some more plays I am waiting for possible line movement in my favor
I kinda feel like I should've seen that Houston over coming.
The GS under, not so much.
interesting take...guess if USC wipes the floor with 'em it won't matter if you took the over or UCLA, youre fucked either way...Quote:
Originally Posted by verminaard
Stanford steve did say he's gotta feeling this will comedown to ava devine-ing it in the last couple of minutes...
the OREST game makes me want to throw up in my mouth, but will give their interim guy this; dude's got some energy
I really want to autofire on Chicago under, fade Chicago spread, and fade Sac tomorrow.
However I'm seeing reverse line movement on all 3 (people are doing exactly the above, and the books are trying to make more happen), so I don't know what the fuck to say.
Now I'm kinda hesitant.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Charham
Not so much.
Took Hornets -6 at Chicago. Hornets are a pretty good team in a bad losing streak. They are really gonna want to turn things around against an overmatched Bulls team IMO.
To be honest, I think this, too.Quote:
Originally Posted by verminaard
I also want to auto-fire on the under.
But as previously indicated, most people are firing on Charlotte, yet the line keeps moving to entice more betting on them. So....
https://memegenerator.net/img/instan...ou-go-hmmm.jpg
Fair enough. The line has moved to 6.5 FWIW.Quote:
Originally Posted by Dan DruffTo be honest, I think this, too.Quote:
Originally Posted by verminaard
I also want to auto-fire on the under.
But as previously indicated, most people are firing on Charlotte, yet the line keeps moving to entice more betting on them. So....
https://memegenerator.net/img/instan...ou-go-hmmm.jpg
NBA:
Miami Under 208 -115
Detroit Under 209.5 -105
Perhaps more later.
I disagree. There are scenarios where USC wins big and the over hits. I just don't see many scenarios where UCLA covers AND the game goes under.Quote:
Originally Posted by GambleBotsChafedPenisinteresting take...guess if USC wipes the floor with 'em it won't matter if you took the over or UCLA, youre fucked either way...Quote:
Originally Posted by verminaard
Stanford steve did say he's gotta feeling this will comedown to ava devine-ing it in the last couple of minutes...
the OREST game makes me want to throw up in my mouth, but will give their interim guy this; dude's got some energy
Another:
Clippers +6
ok on them! Gl to us.Quote:
Originally Posted by Dan Druff
More NFL Fail.
You don’t have to read the article. Gimme some news the viewers can use. Weather, fantasy and betting. Think Jimmy the Greek or Musberger. Instead you get 11 HOF players on a desk acting like goofs. Useless shite.
This is in large part Goodell and the anti gambling thing which is reality distortion. If Goodell gets resigned you can stick a fork in this league.
What’s causing the downturn in NFL pregame show viewership?
http://awfulannouncing.com/fox/nfl-p...ble-watch.html
FYI, so far the sharp money (regarding my bets) has gone on the Detroit under.
The Miami under was neither sharp nor square money, and the Clippers was once sharp money, but now it's neither sharp nor square.
Clippers are now +6.5, but that also means Vegas doesn't have all that much faith in them, so take that as it goes.
makes me wonder how good SVPs ratings are for SC...I mean the guy doesn't give any fucks about having gambling being part of his show...he does the 'winners' on Thursday and 'bad beats' on tuesday and then ever so often he'll sprinkle a 'bad beats' segment throughout the week...love how all these leagues (except for the NBA where silver seems to actually know that, yeah people fire on this shit) try to distance themselves from gambling when that's what's driving the vast majority of their viewership...Quote:
Originally Posted by Sanlmar
just started to read this, but cant believe it's not going to be a great article...don van natta's stuff is usually pretty fucking great...
http://www.espn.com/espn/otl/story/_...er-jerry-jones
my favorite part of the article so far:
"I'm gonna come after you with everything I have," Jones said. Then he mentioned Deflategate. "If you think Bob Kraft came after you hard, Bob Kraft is a pussy compared to what I'm going to do."
:lol
^^^
It’s long but my enjoyment of this miserable situation is maximized with every additional sentence. I wished it would never end.
Goodell has been there too long. He has too much collective baggage. The NFL’s place in a changing world requires a fresh face.
I could live without the NFL. I already do for the most part. However, as much fun as college football is there is a ticking bomb over there too. Oliver Luck ain’t gonna be available forever. Lotsa luck NCAA.
yeah after goddell has fucked up so much with the domestic violence shit, it probably is...but like the article mentioned there's really no viable successor and the last thing they want to do is have a fresh face in there for those labor talks that are coming up in 2021 (think that's the year)...owners sure as shit don't want to give up any of the pie that they have managed to clawback from the players in the last set of talks...think it's gonna get really ugly when these negotiations take place...both sides absolutely hate each other...if I could bet there being missed games or replacement players at some time during 2021 i'd take that bet at a decent enough price...Quote:
Originally Posted by Sanlmar
as far as the NCAA goes, you're 100% right...billion dollar TV deals, 8 figure college football coaching deals, FBI investigations...where there's money there's eventually gonna be somebody who tries to get some of that money for the players...obviously the players tried and failed, but all it takes is somebody with money to get behind their cause and it could have people in indy shaking...
Clippers just shot off a late-2nd 10-point lead, and are tied at halftime.
Detroit under got off to a terrible start and I almost wrote it off by the early 2nd, but now it's right on the cusp regarding covering (on pace for 208.5 according to Bovada). Indiana is catching up though so I'm probably losing this one, due to the fouling nonsense at the end.
Miami under pick was
:solidgold
and will win barring some 2OT or some nonsense like that.
Regarding the "Chicago auto-bet" I talked about and didn't do, it's looking like the under will lose and fading them will win, but it's still kinda early.
Share a little bit of a hate bet with you.
Lakers/Suns
MOBILE - BASKETBALL - NBA - 721 PHOENIX SUNS +7½ -111 FOR GAME
This will appear counter intuitive after Suns performance yesterday. We can delve into the awfulness of the Lakers if you like but it really shouldn’t be necessary. There is a hierarchy of bad and it is clear where the Lakers fall.
Basically, I just really need the money.
Chappie - where you been lately?
nice under on DET-IND...that was a fucking sweat...glad they didn't foul down 7 with 19 to go...
Yeah I thought I was getting fucked there.Quote:
Originally Posted by GambleBotsChafedPenis
Honestly I deserved this after the screw job I got the other day with the under where they fouled 9 down with 7 seconds left.
Also my decision to avoid Chicago under + fade looking pretty good so far.
Honestly kinda wanted to take Dallas today but they are so bad and Minn is so good that I couldn't bring myself to do it. Sharp $ loved that side though.
ended up hopping on at half, got a little better line with CHAR -4.5Quote:
Originally Posted by Dan Druff
Shout out to what a trainwreck the Cavs are.
Yet every day the public lavishes $ on the books backing them.
Lebron must read this site, or have the Pentagon read it for him.
Cavs run off 6 straight right as I post that.
This better not OT & fuck me.
Damnit 105-105 with 47 secs
I don't care who wins, but please someone just win this in regulation.
Uh-ohQuote:
Originally Posted by Mintjewlips