lololololol
Printable View
What are the chances that this "victim" ends up in jail for some kind of violent offense by age 20?
Would any of you want to bet against that?
Why do so many of these media-publicized "brutality" cases always center around horrible, disruptive people, and casting them as victims?
You constantly show a ridiculously hardline approach to behaviour that doesn't meet your with your standards. Everything is black & white to you.
Just the other week you were calling for bombs to rain down on Jamaica and troops into Nigeria because there's a scamming ring running out of said countries.
I mean look at the reaction to your opinions ITT. You're in a small minority and it kills you why more people are not as stone cold as you are (thank fuck)
I'll just mention to you that the floor is a weapon. I don't expect you to have known that. An 8ft drop would have killed her, a 2 ft drop with downward force is enough to do great bodily harm to an unfit teenage girl. That's really the trifecta of breakable human body types.
so druff why is the cop fired if he did not act inappropriately?
police have standards and procedures they are held to when enforcing the law. why is the sheriff and department not standing with him in support of his actions? its because he did not handle the incident in the manner that he was trained or expected to by his department.
exactly what qualifies you to determine whether the amount of force used was reasonable? your many years of watching miami vice?
there are protocols and procedural policies in place for exactly these types of instances, and he obviously did not meet them.
I don't see any downward force. I see him lifting her off the desk and putting her on the floor. In fact, it looks like he's not even completely dropping her, but rather just putting her down quickly.
How come we haven't heard of any major or even medium-grade injuries if this force was so terrible?
are you just playing devils advocate to get some traffic on this no offense but lately dead and boring forum? otherwise i cannot take you seriously in this thread and maybe further on.
Does anyone think a police officer should be involved in school discipline? He wasn't arresting her, he was "removing" her from the class.
And remember, some of you pretend to be small government conservatives. Republicans need that reminder more and more these days.
The police cannot assume each unruly person they deal with is mentally disturbed.
We don't even have evidence that this girl was mentally disturbed. Sounds like a a lot of assumptions are being thrown around in order to make the girl sound more victim-like.
Would your opinion about this change if you learned that the girl did not have mental/emotional handicaps, and was simply being a defiant bitch?
I think we're at the point of counting how many angels will fit on the head of a pin. I see it as an attack on someone who was mentally unstable and you see it differently. I will concede that she needs to not be in public school if you concede that he shouldn't deal with juvenile offenders. But I guess that doesn't matter because his fate is already decided and his boss didn't see it your way.
You don't have to sympathize with the girl to recognize that the cop crossed a line. People can be still be victims as a result of their own stupid actions.
Sometimes when poker players get scammed, I hear people say it's hard to sympathize with them because they were so naive or stupid. Fine. Don't feel sorry for them. You should still condemn the scumbag that scammed them, though.
How do you know she wasn't going to be arrested after being removed?
It's actually better if a police officer is involved, because it removes the level of liability the school has if something goes wrong.
If the assistant principal tries to remove her and something goes wrong, her parents could claim that he "wasn't trained for physical confrontation" and sue the school for millions.
Similarly, if I were in a restaurant and was disrupting the place and refusing to leave, it would be safer (legally and physically) for the restaurant owner to call the police to do it, rather than attempt to physically throw me out himself.
Presumably this officer was employed by the school because they had enough of a problem with unruly students to where an additional level of authority above school administrator was needed to handle some problems.
The cop in question was effectively on probation for previous abuse allegations. He could have used any number of pain-compliance methods to facilitate the exfiltration of the student. Instead, he went ham.
So...
Yes the student should have been subjected to forceful removal through increasingly severe application-of-force methods.
No the cop did not perform as trained and needed to be held responsible for that. Termination is appropriate here.
Sorry to ruin the thread but Im sure someone will find something to needlessly debate.