Printable View
You're right.Quote:
Originally Posted by sonatine
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mintjewlips
Cite some case law to back up the assertion that her transgressions would somehow, in some world, justify a day behind bars.
Seriously. Take just a dew drop from that ocean of righteous indication and use it to find some coge legal precedent for it.
It's TOTALLY legal to be a cunt.
Quote:
Originally Posted by MintjewlipsYou're right.Quote:
Originally Posted by sonatine
It's TOTALLY legal to be a cunt.
Its working out great for me so far.
http://www.globalresearch.ca/trump-u...lated_articles
When was the last time the media threw 100% of its support behind one party’s presidential candidate? What does that say about the media?
Do you feel comfortable with the idea that a handful of TV and print-news executives are inserting themselves into the process and choosing our leaders for us? Is that the way democracy is supposed to work?
Check out this blurb from The Hill:
“The broadcast evening news programs ABC, NBC and CBS covered allegations against Trump by several women who claim he sexually assaulted them for more than 23 minutes on Thursday night. But revelations in the WikiLeaks dump of Clinton campaign chairman John Podesta which included…sympathy for Wall Street, advocation for open borders and blatant examples of media collusion ….got a whole 1 minute and 7 seconds combined.”
Ratio of negative coverage of Trump to Clinton: 23:1
In print on Thursday, it was no better. The New York Times had 11 negative stories on Trump…But zero on Clinton/WikiLeaks.
Ratio: 11:0.” (Media and Trump bias; Not even trying to hide it anymore, The Hill)
The article in The Hill also refers to a survey by the Washington Post and ABC News that asks participants six questions about allegations of sexual misconduct by Trump, but zero questions about Podesta’s incriminating emails.
Is that what you call “balance”?
I should state out-front, that I don’t plan to vote for either candidate, Trump or Clinton, so my claims of “bias” are not grounded in support for one candidate or the other. I am simply ticked-off by the fact that the media honchos have pulled out all the stops and are inserting themselves in the process to produce the outcome they want.
That’s what you call “rigging” an election. When you turn on Washington Week (Gwen Ifil) on public TV and see an assembled panel of six pundits–three conservatives and three liberals–and all six turn out to love Hillary and hate Trump; you can be reasonably certain that the election is rigged, because that’s what rigging is. Rather than providing background information about the candidate’s position on the issues so voters can make an informed decision, the media uses opinionmakers to heap praise on one candidate while savagely denigrating the other. The obvious goal is to shape public opinion in the way that best suits the interests of the people who own the media and who belong to the establishment of rich and powerful elites who run the country, the 1 percent. In this case, the ruling class unanimously backs Hillary Clinton, that much is obvious.
Does it really matter what she said in these speeches?
Not to me. The huge sums of money prove beyond any reasonable doubt that Clinton is selling access, tacitly agreeing to “go easy” on the big Wall Street investment banks provided they keep her foundation’s coffers overflowing. What other possible explanation could there be?
Do as many Americans know about Hillary’s sordid dealings with Wall Street as know about Trump’s “alleged” sexual dalliances?
Of course not. It’s not even close.
Do they know that Clinton was the driving force behind the intervention in Libya and Syria, where hundreds of thousands of civilians have died and seven million have been internally displaced? Do they know she was involved in the toppling of a democratically-elected government in Honduras or that a number of prominent neocons, who dragged the US into war in Iraq based on WMD lies, now support her?
Nope.
Do people know that Hillary had proof that ISIS –America’s arch enemy– was being funded and supported by our allies, Saudi Arabia and Qatar and, yet, she never reported the news to the American people??
Here’s a damning clip from one of the Podesta emails:
“We need to use our diplomatic and more traditional intelligence assets to bring pressure on the governments of Qatar and Saudi Arabia, which are providing clandestine financial and logistic support to Isis and other radical groups in the region.”
Remember when George W. Bush said that ‘We will treat the terrorists and the people who support the terrorists the same”?
Hillary must not have gotten that memo or we would have bombed Riyadh by now.
Dirtbag B Sonatine Hong Kong approve of Hillary's foreign policy track record, nuff said. How about you guys make a Hillary for President thread, Buzz off!
This is called rigging an election.
Social Media Blackout? FBI Emails Are Not ‘Trending Social Media Facebook, Twitter, Buzzfeed, Or Snapchat
New Evidence Links Voting Machines And Clinton Foundation
http://www.globalresearch.ca/new-evi...dation/5553880
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lord of the FraudQuote:
Originally Posted by sonatine
So suppose article is correct. What is in it for Trump by offering HUGE sweeteners to Moscow at this stage?
He shouldn't have anything to gain by doing that unless Russia is somehow helping Trump to pick up more votes.
If the whole wiki/assange/russia/trump link was ever proven. The song would then go "Lock Him up"
Actually the play is to make the best deals for the USA and the HUGE payback is to look the other way when Russia takes the UK. Sorry braj, hope you like vodka.
FBI in Internal Feud Over Hillary Clinton Probe
Laptop may contain thousands of messages sent to or from Mrs. Clinton’s private server
http://www.wsj.com/articles/laptop-m...ver-1477854957
Federal authorities reportedly battled over direction of Clinton email investigation
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2016...stigation.html
FBI agents told to "Stand Down" in the investigation into the Clinton Foundation.
Quote:
The FBI and the Justice Department reportedly were at odds over how to investigate Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton as federal authorities announced they would take a new look at her emails.
The Wall Street Journal, citing people familiar with the matter, reported Sunday that senior law enforcement officials voiced skepticism several times of the strength of the bureau’s investigation into the Clinton Foundation, looked to condense the effort put into the probe and even told agents to limit their pursuit of the case.
The FBI initially started their investigation into the Clinton Foundation to determine whether financial crimes or influence peddling occurred related to the charity.
According to the paper, some investigators grew frustrated with the case and viewed some of the FBI leaders as uninterested. Some others involved in the case disagreed, saying that the FBI’s second-in-command Andrew McCabe was in a fight for control between the Justice Department and the FBI’s probing the foundation.
McCabe started overseeing the case into Clinton’s private email server earlier this year. However, McCabe seemed to be caught in between a rock and a hard place after it was learned last week that his wife Dr. Jill McCabe received more than $465,000 in campaign funds from a political action committee of Virginia Gov. Terry McAuliffe, a longtime Clinton ally and former foundation board member. She was running for an open state Senate seat in November, but lost.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4odN5g_urjI
bear in mind that comey told congress that the way hillary handled classified information was illegal, but said he wouldn't recommend charges against her because he couldn't prove she did it intentionally.Quote:
Originally Posted by sonatineQuote:
Originally Posted by Mintjewlips
Cite some case law to back up the assertion that her transgressions would somehow, in some world, justify a day behind bars.
Seriously. Take just a dew drop from that ocean of righteous indication and use it to find some coge legal precedent for it.
also the WSJ just reported that the DOJ blocked the FBI's investigation into the Clinton Foundation, so..... wonderful country we have here. http://www.mediaite.com/print/report...on-foundation/
worst election in history and i'm including those involving african dictatorships. wake me in 4 years
Polls have been over sampled in favor of hillary for the last 5 months or so. You can argue the legality of her fuck ups forever, i will leave that up to the fbi. But theres no doubt all this is hurting hillary, at worst a devastating blow in public perception imo.
Get ready to say President Donald J Trump.
Not to mention the following months of Lol quotes.
AMERICANISM NOT GLOBALISM WILL BE OUR CREEDO
I'll cut you guys some slack, if the only news i digested for the last year came from corporate run entities, id be a drooling moron too.
Lol at drudge
The Clintons are a ‘crime family’: Ex-FBI big
http://nypost.com/2016/10/30/the-cli...ly-ex-fbi-big/
Quote:
A high-ranking FBI official talked of La Cosa Clinton Sunday — as he placed the Democratic political family in the same category as the Gambinos, Colombos and Lucheses.
“The Clintons, that’s a crime family,” declared former New York FBI chief James Kallstrom in a radio interview.
“It’s like organized crime, basically. The Clinton Foundation is a cesspool.”
He echoed many of GOP presidential candidate Donald Trump’s talking points as he described Clintons as dishonest, greedy and scheming, during the interview with supermarket billionaire John Catsimatidis on AM970.
“It’s just outrageous how Hillary Clinton sold her office for money,” said Kallstrom who has long been a critic of the Clintons and President Obama.
“And she’s a pathological liar, and she’s always been a liar. And God forbid if we put someone like that in the White House.”
In another interview Sunday, Kallstrom said that the handling of the probe into Clinton’s emails by FBI Director James Comey was sowing dischord among rank and file FBI agents.
“There’s a major, major morale problem. I mean, it’s like a boiling cauldron,” Kallstrom told Fox News’ “Justice with Judge Jeanine” program Saturday night.
“I don’t know that ‘cause I talk to everybody down there, but I’ve talked to enough people . . . and they are totally disgusted with him.”
Kallstrom also ripped Attorney General Loretta Lynch, saying she never had a “real investigation” into the emails.
https://thenypost.files.wordpress.co...4&h=441&crop=1
good point mint. on an unrelated note, would you care to comment on this?Quote:
Originally Posted by Mintjewlips
Quote:
Originally Posted by blake
It's not just Alex Jones. 40% of Trump's supporters in Florida think that Hillary is an actual demon.Quote:
Originally Posted by blakegood point mint. on an unrelated note, would you care to comment on this?
Quote:
Originally Posted by blake
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/wo...-a7388546.html
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oversa..._data_analysisQuote:
Originally Posted by Mintjewlips
There's no oversampling in favor of anyone. Oversampling just doesn't mean what you think it does. You could try finding out what it means from the link i provided for you or you could spend a few minutes looking it up from google, but i'm fairly sure you'll rather stay ignorant since it takes a lot less effort.
LOLQuote:
Originally Posted by blakegood point mint. on an unrelated note, would you care to comment on this?
Quote:
Originally Posted by blake
This is like the media saying wiki leaks was obtained in an illegal manner so just disregard them. The only important part of a message is the message itself. We can argue about semantics all day, but facts are self evident.
I'm way more qualified to talk about alex jones then any sniveling delusional hack journalist that takes a 3 minute video on youtube purposely out of context. I have been listening to the guy since 2003, and it's so hilarious to watch him purposely troll the media with these ridiculous statements, which he admits are metaphors he uses to troll the media, which they fall for everytime. He actually says it before or after his crazy rants.
Nonetheless, Alex is a provocateur of the highest order, the fact that Hillary Clinton mention him in particular in a speech was a surreal moment to say the least. And while the memory of some of you might be fading, it wasn't that long ago that he and wiki leaks were legitimized during the bush administration by certain democratic or left leaning news orginazations. I specifically remember the democrats in austin seeing him as THE anti establishment journalist. I find it funny how now those same democrats are calling him a "conspiracy theorist".
Anthony Weiner is GOD
Lol what a complete fuck up. These are the sort of people that are running our country.
Have over 10k in trump win bets anywhere from +300 to +450
Miracles can happen.
so when he talked about the flies swarming on clinton and obama and the smell of sulfur coming off of them, he meant metaphorical flies and sulfur?Quote:
Originally Posted by MintjewlipsLOLQuote:
Originally Posted by blakegood point mint. on an unrelated note, would you care to comment on this?
Quote:
Originally Posted by blake
This is like the media saying wiki leaks was obtained in an illegal manner so just disregard them. The only important part of a message is the message itself. We can argue about semantics all day, but facts are self evident.
I'm way more qualified to talk about alex jones then any sniveling delusional hack journalist that takes a 3 minute video on youtube purposely out of context. I have been listening to the guy since 2003, and it's so hilarious to watch him purposely troll the media with these ridiculous statements, which he admits are metaphors he uses to troll the media, which they fall for everytime. He actually says it before or after his crazy rants.
Nonetheless, Alex is a provocateur of the highest order, the fact that Hillary Clinton mention him in particular in a speech was a surreal moment to say the least. And while the memory of some of you might be fading, it wasn't that long ago that he and wiki leaks were legitimized during the bush administration by certain democratic or left leaning news orginazations. I specifically remember the democrats in austin seeing him as THE anti establishment journalist. I find it funny how now those same democrats are calling him a "conspiracy theorist".
lol guys that's just him being a provocateur.
It's all subjective.Quote:
Originally Posted by blakeso when he talked about the flies swarming on clinton and obama and the smell of sulfur coming off of them, he meant metaphorical flies and sulfur?Quote:
Originally Posted by MintjewlipsLOLQuote:
Originally Posted by blake
This is like the media saying wiki leaks was obtained in an illegal manner so just disregard them. The only important part of a message is the message itself. We can argue about semantics all day, but facts are self evident.
I'm way more qualified to talk about alex jones then any sniveling delusional hack journalist that takes a 3 minute video on youtube purposely out of context. I have been listening to the guy since 2003, and it's so hilarious to watch him purposely troll the media with these ridiculous statements, which he admits are metaphors he uses to troll the media, which they fall for everytime. He actually says it before or after his crazy rants.
Nonetheless, Alex is a provocateur of the highest order, the fact that Hillary Clinton mention him in particular in a speech was a surreal moment to say the least. And while the memory of some of you might be fading, it wasn't that long ago that he and wiki leaks were legitimized during the bush administration by certain democratic or left leaning news orginazations. I specifically remember the democrats in austin seeing him as THE anti establishment journalist. I find it funny how now those same democrats are calling him a "conspiracy theorist".
lol guys that's just him being a provocateur.
If you want to focus on that part and only that part then you are entitled to do so.
Donna Brazile out at CNN, because CNN apparently doesn't have naysayer Sonatine on their wikileaks vetting team.
And yet most diehard Bernie supporters are still voting for Hillary, even though we now see that even more shit was rigged against him.
The radical Neocon who wrote the PNAC documents is now fundraising and advising Hillary. His wife is running shit in Ukraine after helping plot the overthrow. Victoria Nuland remember the name, she is and will be advising Hillary too. They are pondering a well timed preemptive nuclear strike against Russia. Regime change in Russia is their goal. HELLO!
If the American people (esp women) are dumb enough to vote for Hillary with her record of disaster, poor judgement and FBI investigations .They deserve to live under the constant threat of getting vaporized and they deserve Neoliberalism.
If Hillary wins and things go wrong Sona, Dirtbag B and their crew deserve to spend their final days looking for water that isn't radioactive. What, you guys really thought Bibi was going to swoop in and save you like Superman.
https://theintercept.com/2016/07/25/...llary-clinton/
"As the co-founder of the neoconservative think tank Project for the New American Century, Kagan played a leading role in pushing for America’s unilateral invasion of Iraq and insisted for years afterward that it had turned out great.
Despite the catastrophic effects of that war, Kagan insisted at last week’s fundraiser that U.S. foreign policy over the last 25 years has been “an extraordinary success.”
Dan Druff: rape case is 100% phony, already exposed that... why are you posting this?
Classic libtard FBI, ignoring Druff's post about how its all lies set up by some guy someplace, aka 'exposing' all the rape charges as fraud.
This is who's behind this Ukraine conflict. That fuckin bitch needs to resign, to much conflict of interest.
https://consortiumnews.com/2015/03/2...perpetual-war/
A Family Business of Perpetual War
Quote
Victoria Nuland and Robert Kagan have a great mom-and-pop business going. From the State Department, she generates wars and from op-ed pages he demands Congress buy more weapons. There’s a pay-off, too, as grateful military contractors kick in money to think tanks where other Kagans work, writes Robert Parry.
By Robert Parry
Neoconservative pundit Robert Kagan and his wife, Assistant Secretary of State Victoria Nuland, run a remarkable family business: she has sparked a hot war in Ukraine and helped launch Cold War II with Russia and he steps in to demand that Congress jack up military spending so America can meet these new security threats.
This extraordinary husband-and-wife duo makes quite a one-two punch for the Military-Industrial Complex, an inside-outside team that creates the need for more military spending, applies political pressure to ensure higher appropriations, and watches as thankful weapons manufacturers lavish grants on like-minded hawkish Washington think tanks.
Not only does the broader community of neoconservatives stand to benefit but so do other members of the Kagan clan, including Robert’s brother Frederick at the American Enterprise Institute and his wife Kimberly, who runs her own shop called the Institute for the Study of War.
Robert Kagan, a senior fellow at the Brookings Institution (which doesn’t disclose details on its funders), used his prized perch on the Washington Post’s op-ed page on Friday to bait Republicans into abandoning the sequester caps limiting the Pentagon’s budget, which he calculated at about $523 billion (apparently not counting extra war spending). Kagan called on the GOP legislators to add at least $38 billion and preferably more like $54 billion to $117 billion:
With half the nation in or near poverty.
ExactlyQuote:
Originally Posted by MumblesBadly
Quote:
Originally Posted by hongkongerExactlyQuote:
Originally Posted by MumblesBadly
Worked out well for this guy.
:lol2
Quote:
Originally Posted by sonatine
Ok there is a weird paywall there so:
http://www.dailykos.com/stories/2016...sing-to-pay-up
Apparently Trump only pays pollsters who claim hes winning.
Quote:
Originally Posted by hongkongerExactlyQuote:
Originally Posted by MumblesBadly
Unfuckinbelievable, this fucker lied us into Iraq.
https://theintercept.com/2016/07/25/...llary-clinton/
When Robbie Martin, a filmmaker who recently produced a three-part documentary on the neoconservative movement, asked how Clinton plans to deal with Ukraine, Kagan responded enthusiastically.
“I know Hillary cares more about Ukraine than the current president does,” Kagan replied. “[Obama] said to me [that he wouldn’t arm Ukraine because] he doesn’t want a nuclear war with Russia,” he added, rolling his eyes dismissively. “I don’t think Obama cares about Putin anymore at all. I think he’s hopeless.”
Kagan is married to Victoria Nuland, the Obama administration’s hardline assistant secretary of state for European and Eurasian Affairs. Nuland, who would likely serve in a senior position in a Clinton administration, supports shipping weapons to Ukraine despite major opposition from European countries and concerns about the neo-Nazi elements those weapons would empower.
Another thing neoconservatives and liberal hawks have in common is confidence that the foreign policy establishment is right, and the growing populist hostility to military intervention is naïve and uninformed.
Kagan complained that Americans are “so focused on the things that have gone wrong in recent years, they miss the sort of basic underlying unusual quality of the international order that we’ve been living in.
“It’s not just Donald Trump,” Kagan said. “I think you can find in both parties a very strong sense that we don’t need to be out there anymore.”
“If, as I hope, Hillary Clinton is elected, she is going to immediately be confronting a country that is not where she is,” he said. “She is a believer in this world order. But a great section of the country is not and is going to require persuasion and education.”
I look forward to our persuasion and education, thanks Robert. Sounds like a new 911.
This world order? They can't even make up a good lie so they throw some vague meaningless bullshit out there. His fucking bitch needs to resign from the SD.
This whole WW3 fiasco is totally unnecessary, this is for Hillary's donors.
You bitter clingers still hanging on to the hope hillary will still be elected president.
:lol2
:applause
:boom
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AQ5Snbq-zX0
"Reports thus far for show support for clinton lagging compared to obamas run just 4 years ago"
:lol2
:boom
Just make sure you're around after novemeber 8th so you can take your medicine.
Can you say bell weather?
:lol2
Very coge.
Lil dicky still holding on to his delusions i see.
I can't even discern what side you're on by this diatribe, but if you've listened to Alex Jones for 13 years you should check into a government facility of your choice.Quote:
Originally Posted by MintjewlipsLOLQuote:
Originally Posted by blakegood point mint. on an unrelated note, would you care to comment on this?
Quote:
Originally Posted by blake
This is like the media saying wiki leaks was obtained in an illegal manner so just disregard them. The only important part of a message is the message itself. We can argue about semantics all day, but facts are self evident.
I'm way more qualified to talk about alex jones then any sniveling delusional hack journalist that takes a 3 minute video on youtube purposely out of context. I have been listening to the guy since 2003, and it's so hilarious to watch him purposely troll the media with these ridiculous statements, which he admits are metaphors he uses to troll the media, which they fall for everytime. He actually says it before or after his crazy rants.
Nonetheless, Alex is a provocateur of the highest order, the fact that Hillary Clinton mention him in particular in a speech was a surreal moment to say the least. And while the memory of some of you might be fading, it wasn't that long ago that he and wiki leaks were legitimized during the bush administration by certain democratic or left leaning news orginazations. I specifically remember the democrats in austin seeing him as THE anti establishment journalist. I find it funny how now those same democrats are calling him a "conspiracy theorist".
Im not on a side les.
If you want to label me in this false paradigm then call me an anarchist. Down with the fucking system.