Fun?
Printable View
Imagine thinking that you should ignore the intense danger to you and your family from a freak breaking into your house, and not shooting him because you are concerned for the invader's health.
I would feel zero guilt about shooting dead anyone who broke in here.
Have you not read the various headlines regarding deadly home invasions?
Unfortunately you cannot read the mind of a home invader, so killing them is the only reasonable option.
There is respectable scholar empirical research that shows that nighttime home invasions are much more common per capita in the UK versus the US, while daytime burglaries occur at rate in the US than in the UK. Guess which country has stricter gun ownership laws?
That being said, a woman in the US is about 4 times more likely to be killed by her partner if there is a gun in the home. Those results, however, could be driven largely by selection bias, meaning ownership of a gun by a woman's partner is a strong signal of greater likely of eventual homicidal domestic violence regardless of how easy owning a gun makes it possible to commit.
i'm assuming you meant at "a higher" rate in the US than in the UK with respect to daytime burglaries.
doesn't your argument support druff's position that prevalent residential gun ownership acts as a deterrent? as a liberal, i assume you were attempting to disagree
blake theres two nhl contests waiting for you i literally made two lineups so u can lose twice
Your statement regarding the US versus UK nighttime home invasions would support gun ownership.
They would indicate that burglars are more willing to encounter a homeowner in the UK, where a gun isn't expected to be there, than in the US -- a place they might get shot by the homeowner!
Instead, they are breaking into homes while people are away at work and school during the day!
Did you mean to support gun ownership by your post? Because whether you meant it or not, you just did.
Larry Laffer if you "Suicide by Druff" I will never let them talk shit about you.
I presented information that both supports liberal gun ownership laws, as well as speaks against it. Because, as neither dogmatic sides of this issue want to openly it, gun rights is a multifaceted issue. It both creates and mitigates various risks. The greater question is which risks are we collectively willing to put up with in order to reduce others. And which legal measures, i.e. what combination of criminal and civil laws, would be best to strike that tradeoff.
And remember guys. Uber will pick your crazy looking ass up deliver you and your gas mask, bullet proof vest, multiple clips, magazine, and easily concealable AR-15 and take you right to Antifa headquarters AKA Freshman Building of a high school and tell the rider to knock em dead.
My favorite part as of the last time I tortured myself with this shit, is that the FBI supposedly still hasn't been able to link Cruz to those youtube threats. They prob think it's so funny when they tell the truth that no one would ever believe. I guess they have to make people believe they couldn't really find Bin Laden somehow. My second favorite part is how Cruz used multiple burner phones and went to a great extent to hide his identity in other ways all along leading up to this including bogus IPs and covering his face with masks in the pictures on his Instagram account. Oh but wait... his instagram account was NikolasCruzMakarov... and he signed his youtube threats with the name Nikolas Cruz.
This is the problem with liberals and gun control. In the biggest gun control city in the county this is what cook country does with criminals caught with illegal guns: http://www.cwbchicago.com/2018/02/mo...t-how.html?m=1
What a joke.
also if i take down the UCL dk contest im buying you a new cat because honestly youre just insufferable like this.
none of u guys would send me the 5 bucks it costed.
Are Chaps and Sonatine going steady?