Quote:
Originally Posted by GambleBotsSatire
stein is rabidly anti-vacc and also thinks wifi gives kids cancer etc etc.
shes what happened to the green party when the stable people grew out of it and the wackjobs became the majority.
Printable View
Quote:
Originally Posted by GambleBotsSatire
stein is rabidly anti-vacc and also thinks wifi gives kids cancer etc etc.
shes what happened to the green party when the stable people grew out of it and the wackjobs became the majority.
hey you two ligtards, why dont you let some other people respond
"Safe" fracking rofl thank you for that I needed a laugh.
Quote:
Originally Posted by GambleBotsSatire
http://youtu.be/n_SYCrJK6xg
Trump acts like a monumental pussy every day.Quote:
Originally Posted by DraymondYou are not taking into account this would never, ever happen. Even if it were legal, there is no way Trump would completely destroy his legacy and acting like a monumental pussy and running away. He is one of two people that can be President right now, and there is no way he is going to walk away from that.Quote:
Originally Posted by sonatine
People are acting like Clinton is unbeatable, but that is mostly CNN which only 500,000 people daily watch. The next Wikileaks bomb could sink her candidacy. They have already said they are going to stagger the releases in the next several months. When that happens, nobody is going to remember Kahn or any of this other shit. It's all going to come down to the debates, and in my opinion Wikileaks.
http://media2.fdncms.com/arktimes/im...?cb=1463865304
Un.....comfortable with the hand placement.
https://lettersofrejection.files.wor...-450.jpg?w=490
In this shot, she seems to agree with me. Her hands saying "that's far enough" to his.
http://cdn2.thr.com/sites/default/fi...t_-_h_2015.jpg
Eyes all like "save me!" yall.
the latest left wing publication to bash trump. . . fox newsQuote:
Originally Posted by Mintjewlips
Fox News Poll: Clinton leads Trump by 10 points, both seen as flawed
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2016...as-flawed.html
roflQuote:
Sixty-one percent of voters think Hillary Clinton is dishonest, yet she’s opened up a big lead over Donald Trump in the latest Fox News Poll.
Here’s why: majorities think Clinton is nevertheless qualified to be president, and has the temperament and knowledge to serve effectively. It’s the opposite for Trump: over half feel he is not qualified, and lacks the temperament or knowledge to lead
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ricky
Guarantee that sonatine has jerked off to ivanka teenage pics
http://mobile.nytimes.com/2015/06/21...h-polling.htmlQuote:
Originally Posted by blake
Quote:
OVER the past two years, election polling has had some spectacular disasters. Several organizations tracking the 2014 midterm elections did not catch the Republican wave that led to strong majorities in both houses; polls in Israel badly underestimated Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s strength, and pollsters in Britain predicted a close election only to see the Conservatives win easily. What’s going on here? How much can we trust the polls as we head toward the 2016 elections?
Election polling is in near crisis, and we pollsters know. Two trends are driving the increasing unreliability of election and other polling in the United States: the growth of cellphones and the decline in people willing to answer surveys. Coupled, they have made high-quality research much more expensive to do, so there is less of it. This has opened the door for less scientifically based, less well-tested techniques. To top it off, a perennial election polling problem, how to identify “likely voters,” has become even thornier.
In terms of speed, the growth of cellphones is like few innovations in our history. About 10 years ago, opinion researchers began taking seriously the threat that the advent of cellphones posed to our established practice of polling people by calling landline phone numbers generated at random. At that time, the National Health Interview Survey, a high-quality government survey conducted through in-home interviews, estimated that about 6 percent of the public used only cellphones. The N.H.I.S. estimate for the first half of 2014 found that this had grown to 43 percent, with another 17 percent “mostly” using cellphones. In other words, a landline-only sample conducted for the 2014 elections would miss about three-fifths of the American public, almost three times as many as it would have missed in 2008.
Since cellphones generally have separate exchanges from landlines, statisticians have solved the problem of finding them for our samples by using what we call “dual sampling frames” — separate random samples of cell and landline exchanges. The problem is that the 1991 Telephone Consumer Protection Act has been interpreted by the Federal Communications Commission to prohibit the calling of cellphones through automatic dialers, in which calls are passed to live interviewers only after a person picks up the phone. To complete a 1,000-person survey, it’s not unusual to have to dial more than 20,000 random numbers, most of which do not go to actual working telephone numbers. Dialing manually for cellphones takes a great deal of paid interviewer time, and pollsters also compensate cellphone respondents with as much as $10 for their lost minutes.
THE best survey organizations, like the Pew Research Center, complete about two of the more expensive cellphone interviews for every one on a landline. For many organizations, this is a budget buster that leads to compromises in sampling and interviewing.
The second unsettling trend is the rapidly declining response rate. When I first started doing telephone surveys in New Jersey in the late 1970s, we considered an 80 percent response rate acceptable, and even then we worried if the 20 percent we missed were different in attitudes and behaviors than the 80 percent we got. Enter answering machines and other technologies. By 1997, Pew’s response rate was 36 percent, and the decline has accelerated. By 2014 the response rate had fallen to 8 percent. As Nate Silver of fivethirtyeight.com recently observed, “The problem is simple but daunting. The foundation of opinion research has historically been the ability to draw a random sample of the population. That’s become much harder to do.”
This decline is worrisome for two reasons. First, of course, is representativeness. Strangely, for some reason that no one really understands, well-done probability samples seem to have retained their representative character despite the meager response rate. We know this because we can compare the results we get from our surveys to government gold-standard benchmarks like the census’ American Community Survey, where participation is mandated. Even so, Robert M. Groves, the provost of Georgetown and a former director of the Census Bureau, cautions, “The risk of failures of surveys to reflect the facts increases with falling response rates. The risk is not always realized, but with the very low response rates now common, we should expect more failed predictions based on surveys.”
So yea....
lol at you thinking he likes girlsQuote:
Originally Posted by MintjewlipsQuote:
Originally Posted by Ricky
Guarantee that sonatine has jerked off to ivanka teenage pics
He has to be straight trolling at this point
just a common man eating fried chicken with a knife and fork
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uz3isX0LS0YQuote:
Originally Posted by blake
http://cdn.newsapi.com.au/image/v1/6...4dea18e685f4b2
http://assets.nydailynews.com/polopo.../afp-dg78y.jpg
Trump likes to inappropriately touch women including his children.
Clint Eastwood Rips ‘Pussy Generation,’ Says He’ll Vote For Donald Trump
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/...443d?section=&
Quote:
“You know, he’s a racist now because he’s talked about this judge. And yeah, it’s a dumb thing to say. I mean, to predicate your opinion on the fact that the guy was born to Mexican parents or something. He’s said a lot of dumb things. So have all of them. Both sides. But everybody—the press and everybody’s going, ‘Oh, well, that’s racist,’ and they’re making a big hoodoo out of it. Just fucking get over it. It’s a sad time in history.”
Quote:
“(S)ecretly everybody’s getting tired of political correctness, kissing up. That’s the kiss-ass generation we’re in right now. We’re really in a pussy generation. Everybody’s walking on eggshells. We see people accusing people of being racist and all kinds of stuff. When I grew up, those things weren’t called racist. And then when I did Gran Torino, even my associate said, ‘This is a really good script, but it’s politically incorrect.’ And I said, ‘Good. Let me read it tonight.’ The next morning, I came in and I threw it on his desk and I said, ‘We’re starting this immediately.’”
http://8482-presscdn-0-13.pagely.net...hael-moore.jpg
DeliciousQuote:
Originally Posted by TheXFactor
This was an esquire article, i guess you don't read anything other then libtard hack journalism, proves my point about libtards only looking for confirmation bias. Tight job of selectively picking quotes to misconstrued and take this whole article out of context. At least post the interview in full done by the actual magazine, not some blogging website that has a leftwing agenda. If anyone thinks huffpost is legit then you are retarded.Quote:
Originally Posted by TheXFactor
Clint is a fucking legend, put some respek on his name.
Quote:
Originally Posted by 4Dragons
A reporter that had been on Trump's plane during the primary said that they had KFC and Trump ate 5 pieces with his hands. So, I think he actually likes KFC, even though this pic looks like he's pretending.
LOL, Clinton Eastwood gave an interview to Esquire with his son...Quote:
Originally Posted by Mintjewlips
Clint and Scott Eastwood: No Holds Barred in Their First Interview Together
http://www.esquire.com/entertainment...c=socialflowTW
http://esq.h-cdn.co/assets/16/31/980...-september.jpg
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U71-KsDArFM
We're fucking up by letting a private bank lend the govt money so they can turn around and charge us interest on the national debt. The govt could just skip the fed res and issue it themselves. FR the greatest hustle ever.
We're paying all that interest for nothing and they know it. That's why they named it the Fed. Reserve, so people would assume it's part of the fed govt.
This isn't some pro Ron Paul, gold backed currency bs. Gold backed currency is the nut low.
Most people don't even want their water supply privatized but the FR is puling this shit, swh.