Time to get on the TRUMP train

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by hongkonger

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by duped_samaritan

Does this bill mean no wall for at least a year, or are there other avenues to get it funded?

---

It's always possible for Congress to pass a bill at any time to authorize spending on whatever. But as it stands there is no money for the wall in FY 2018 which ends September 30. FY 2019 starts October 1. My crystal balls tell me there won't be any money for the wall in that budget either.

:lol2

---

i'm having a hard time tracking down the source for this besides rush limbaugh, but he's saying that the senate put in a provision that they're not even doing a budget for 2019. thus zero hope for a wall since it's hard to imagine congress going even more republican in the meantime

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by blake

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by hongkonger

It's always possible for Congress to pass a bill at any time to authorize spending on whatever. But as it stands there is no money for the wall in FY 2018 which ends September 30. FY 2019 starts October 1. My crystal balls tell me there won't be any money for the wall in that budget either.

:lol2

---

i'm having a hard time tracking down the source for this besides rush limbaugh, but he's saying that the senate put in a provision that they're not even doing a budget for 2019. thus zero hope for a wall since it's hard to imagine congress going even more republican in the meantime

---

Not budgeting for the wall, or not passing a budget at all?

No need for a budget as Mexico is paying for the wall, right?

I look forward to the commercials during midterms of some primary challenger standing next to some shitty fence asking the citizens of the great state of Texas how they love their big beautiful wall.

Wow. I dont understand what hes saying in the first tweet. Does he find it insulting that people said he spent less money and was less manipulative on social media?

The second one just...wow. You can see why hes sidedish’s hero for sure.

In the early days of our democracy there were duels with handguns. Andrew Jackson settled issues of honor with courage not Tweets

Another political tool that has fallen out of favor is political assassination. For centuries it was an occupational hazard.

I really don’t think democracy will survive.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Sanlmar

In the early days of our democracy there were duels with handguns. Andrew Jackson settled issues of honor with courage.

Another political tool that has fallen out of favor is political assassination. For centuries it was an occupational hazard.

I really don’t think democracy will survive.

---

I use the first line - or something akin to it, in my opening to juries in bodily injury claims.

SUPPORTERS OF trump, YOUR ASSISTANCE IS RESPECTFULLY REQUESTED.

As we approach the 430th day of chief little hands mess I looked for any photo of rump saying hi to the overseas troops in person. Could not find any photos.

No visit on last Memorial Day, the 4th of July, Veterans Day, Thanksgiving, XMAS, or NYE. Nor New Years Day, Groundhog Day, Valentines, MLK Day, Presidents Day,

St. Patrick's Day, Iraq War Began Day 3-19-03, Easter, Income Tax Day, Mother's Day, Armed Forces Day, D-Day, Father's Day, Labor Day, Gold Star Mother's Day,

Afghanistan War Began Day 10-7-01, Columbus Day and Halloween.

Please post photos of rump overseas at any Army, Marine Corp, Air Force camp or Navy Base.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by varys

Wow. I dont understand what hes saying in the first tweet. Does he find it insulting that people said he spent less money and was less manipulative on social media?

The second one just...wow. You can see why hes sidedish’s hero for sure.

---

He’s saying the prevailing narrative during the campaign was that the Democrats technological advantages seen during the previous election would carry the day and drive turnout. He’s saying now the election postmortem is revealing that his campaign did it cheaper and smarter than had been done before. It’s part brag, part don’t hate the player hate the game.

It’s somewhat clever enough to make me question if he composed it at all

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by BCR

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by varys

Wow. I dont understand what hes saying in the first tweet. Does he find it insulting that people said he spent less money and was less manipulative on social media?

The second one just...wow. You can see why hes sidedish’s hero for sure.

---

He’s saying the prevailing narrative during the campaign was that the Democrats technological advantages seen during the previous election would carry the day and drive turnout. He’s saying now the election postmortem is revealing that his campaign did it cheaper and smarter than had been done before. It’s part brag, part don’t hate the player hate the game.

It’s somewhat clever enough to make me question if he composed it at all

---

Im with you except the last line of “not saying that anymore!” seems like an odd way to close out if thats what hes trying to do.

I dunno who is more foolish for thinking there was ever going to be a wall, the libtards who used it as a rallying cry to pander to Mexicans, or the MAGA crowd who erroneously thinks the Republican Party wants to keep poor people from Latin America out. Both parties want as much unskilled poor immigrant labor as they can get. The Democrats want the votes and the Republicans want to use the surplus of cheap unskilled labor to depress wages and bust unions.

Neither side is particularly worried about the social services costs that are literally collapsing our nation and economy, because they are rich and due to our rigged tax codes (which weren't a lot better even when the Democrats were in power) the middle class bears the brunt of paying the tax burden.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by verminaard

I dunno who is more foolish for thinking there was ever going to be a wall, the libtards who used it as a rallying cry to pander to Mexicans, or the MAGA crowd who erroneously thinks the Republican Party wants to keep poor people from Latin America out. Both parties want as much unskilled poor immigrant labor as they can get. The Democrats want the votes and the Republicans want to use the surplus of cheap unskilled labor to depress wages and bust unions.

Neither side is particularly worried about the social services costs that are literally collapsing our nation and economy, because they are rich and due to our rigged tax codes (which weren't a lot better even when the Democrats were in power) the middle class bears the brunt of paying the tax burden.

---

As long as you mean social services as a whole and not social services for undocumented people, because undocumented people come here to work not leech off the system.; that’s left to entitled white trash.. The sad truth is that if the government doesn’t support through social services, crime would be at all time high’s. With AI in the very near future taking most unskilled jobs (including truckers) we need to start talking about universal living wages. That should make republicans’ head explode

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by varys

Wow. I dont understand what hes saying in the first tweet. Does he find it insulting that people said he spent less money and was less manipulative on social media?

The second one just...wow. You can see why hes sidedish’s hero for sure.

---

Trump is pretty much a rich version of Jewdonk. He's a great example what happens when a mentally unstable individual is born into extreme riches. Like really if jewdonk was running the country it would be just about the same thing. And if trump was born poor he'd be posting all over these forums threatening people while drunk.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZjDbJQKDXCY

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by El Gallo

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by verminaard

I dunno who is more foolish for thinking there was ever going to be a wall, the libtards who used it as a rallying cry to pander to Mexicans, or the MAGA crowd who erroneously thinks the Republican Party wants to keep poor people from Latin America out. Both parties want as much unskilled poor immigrant labor as they can get. The Democrats want the votes and the Republicans want to use the surplus of cheap unskilled labor to depress wages and bust unions.

Neither side is particularly worried about the social services costs that are literally collapsing our nation and economy, because they are rich and due to our rigged tax codes (which weren't a lot better even when the Democrats were in power) the middle class bears the brunt of paying the tax burden.

---

As long as you mean social services as a whole and not social services for undocumented people, because undocumented people come here to work not leech off the system.; that’s left to entitled white trash.. The sad truth is that if the government doesn’t support through social services, crime would be at all time high’s. With AI in the very near future taking most unskilled jobs (including truckers) we need to start talking about universal living wages. That should make republicans’ head explode

---

Yeah, most people who make under a certain threshold probably use more in services than they make. It is just how the system works. And obviously people on welfare are going to use A LOT more services than their income (which is zero). Poor working people are underpaid for their contribution to society, so most of them are probably taking more out of the system then they are making, but it isn't their fault. All the excess $$ from underpaying poor people goes to rich people, then the middle class disproportionately pays the tax burden as the rich have so many tax breaks. So the rich benefit all around.

As far as UBI, something that Jordan Peterson talks about which I don't think is appreciated, is that the way we are hard wired as human beings, most people who don't work aren't living very productive, fulfilling lives. He is concerned that giving most people UBI and telling them to stay at home is going to end up in a lot of dissatisfied, miserable people with substance abuse issues and no purpose in life; even if their basic needs are being met because of how our psychology works.

That being said, I don't really have a solution for this conundrum. With AI and robotics progressing the way it is there isn't going to be a need for a lot of the 6 billion people on this planet to work, so we have to find a way to deal with this but we also have to keep in consideration psychological health, and there is no indication that giving people UBI will lead to better mental health, and every indication of the opposite.

In theory we can say well people on UBI will be free to live their dreams. And sure, some people will get into art or hobbies or something, but a lot of people aren't wired like this, and they are going to be sitting on the coach all day getting high on opiates being miserable.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by verminaard

As far as UBI, something that Jordan Peterson talks about which I don't think is appreciated, is that the way we are hard wired as human beings, most people who don't work aren't living very productive, fulfilling lives. He is concerned that giving most people UBI and telling them to stay at home is going to end up in a lot of dissatisfied, miserable people with substance abuse issues and no purpose in life; even if their basic needs are being met because of how our psychology works.

---

Ahh, I'm going to suggest we are already there and slouching towards Gomorrah.

Mintjewlips and friends on suicide watch


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QbTtffrPbeQ

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by The_Lurker

Mintjewlips and friends on suicide watch


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QbTtffrPbeQ

---

its clickbait moron

If you are goin to post a swerve at least post the goat swerve

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NSMu_VU_OOg

This was literally more believable than Alex Jones jumping off the trump train

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by thesidedish

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by The_Lurker

Mintjewlips and friends on suicide watch


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QbTtffrPbeQ

---

its clickbait moron

---

The difference is that I wasn't stupid enough to waste one second watching it

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by The_Lurker

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by thesidedish

its clickbait moron

---

The difference is that I wasn't stupid enough to waste one second watching it

---

:lol


OK MORON. why are u posting stuff u don't understand?? u a propagandist or something??