And now Twitter admits that it was actively trying to help Hillary...
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-1...onths-campaign
Printable View
And now Twitter admits that it was actively trying to help Hillary...
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-1...onths-campaign
Quote:
Originally Posted by SrslySirius
I can't imagine any campaign that would be remotely comparable to this, unless they were running Superbowl ads. What propaganda are you talking about?Quote:
Originally Posted by devidee
That is what I was just talking about. You sound like a defensive Pats fanboy arguing about Spygate. Let's stop fixating on the result for a second. If either candidate won in a landslide, and this propaganda only moved the needle a few percentage points, it's still completely unacceptable.Quote:
Originally Posted by thesidedishQuote:
Originally Posted by SrslySirius
It is a non issue, Trump was going to win either way. The truth is the libtards lost to a huge asshole cuz they're annoying AF and no human being wants to admit ppl don't like them so they make up a bunch of stories to explain it away
Examine your biases. Would you be shrugging it off if Hillary benefited from a massive campaign by the Chinese? Be honest with yourself.
I am a pats fanboy, shoulda seen me defending deflategateQuote:
Originally Posted by SrslySiriusThat is exactly what I was just talking about. You sound like a defensive Pats fanboy arguing about Spygate. Let's stop fixating on the result for a second. If either candidate won in a landslide, and this propaganda only moved the needle a few percentage points, it's still completely unacceptable.Quote:
Originally Posted by thesidedish
Examine your biases. Would you be shrugging it off if Hillary benefited from a massive campaign by the Chinese? Be honest with yourself.
And I'm talking about the libtards been saying for a year they lost becuz of russia, that is not true. And I really don't think propaganda campaigns from other countries have really any difference of affecting actual votes, they only thing they can do i think is make us more pissed off cuz the other sides arguments look dumber than they are but ppl were gonna vote the same way regardless. We have much better American propagandists affecting votes
this is nuts and sadly, it's workingQuote:
Originally Posted by devideeThe Russians were paying for BLM ads as well NRA ads. It was about sowing division in America.Quote:
Originally Posted by SrslySirius
guys the russians basically turned antifa from a handful norcal junkies into a pan-national action group.
contemplate this on the tree of woe.
Antifa is a Mossad op.Quote:
Originally Posted by sonatine
So no one has a problem with a candidate rigging a primary?
Sounds like some people have too much personally invested.
lolwat? Aside from Sonatine, apparently, this seems to be one issue that outraged everybody on both sides.Quote:
Originally Posted by devidee
MUH RUSSIANS!Quote:
Originally Posted by SrslySiriuslolwat? Aside from Sonatine, apparently, this seems to be one issue that outraged everybody on both sides.Quote:
Originally Posted by devidee
wut
How about Obama leaving the Democratic Party 26 million dollars in debt?
Quote:
Originally Posted by SrslySiriuslolwat? Aside from Sonatine, apparently, this seems to be one issue that outraged everybody on both sides.Quote:
Originally Posted by devidee
yeah the republicans are just aghast at democrat on neo-socialist violence.
http://i.imgur.com/HsQhLJI.gif
You could have chosen any person at random and I would have voted for that person over Trump. Hell, I voted for Hillary.Quote:
Originally Posted by sonatineQuote:
Originally Posted by SrslySirius
yeah the republicans are just aghast at democrat on neo-socialist violence.
http://i.imgur.com/HsQhLJI.gif
None of that will fix how broken the Democratic Party is at the moment.
point.Quote:
Originally Posted by devideeYou could have chosen any person at random and I would have voted for that person over Trump. Hell, I voted for Hillary.Quote:
Originally Posted by sonatine
None of that will fix how broken the Democratic Party is at the moment.
UH OH
This directly contradicts what Jeff Sessions told the senate at his confirmation hearing.Quote:
Carter Page testifies he told Sessions about Russia trip
During more than six hours of closed-door testimony, Page said that he informed Sessions about his coming July 2016 trip to Russia, which Page told CNN was unconnected to his campaign role. Page described the conversation to CNN after he finished talking to the House intelligence committee.
http://www.cnn.com/2017/11/02/politi...rip/index.html
There's been reports that on numerous occasions, Trump's handlers have had to talk him off the ledge from giving Sessions the axe. What happens now if he finally gets an excuse to do so, or Sessions is compelled to resign? Only the AG (as far as I know) has the authority to get rid of Mueller. Presumably Trump will appoint one who is willing to do just that.
Quote:
Originally Posted by SrslySirius
I was reading something about how the whole Roger Stone / Uranium One farce is a very weird legal maneuver to force Mueller to step down. It's possible they let Sessions hang around until they run out of nonsense like that which could, in theory, deprive Russiagate of its momentum and possibly derail it completely.
If it comes down to having the AG dismiss Mueller... would be in Trump's interests to do so? Or would it be another Saturday Night Massacre?
since sessions recused himself, it's technically rosenstein's call to fire mueller, which he would never do. i don't think trump could get another AG appointed if sessions is fired until the investigation is over.
if someone in trump's family gets indicted (kushner or don jr.), however, then i think we're looking at another saturday night massacre. trump will fire rosenstein and every other assistant AG until he finds one that will get rid of mueller
at this point, i really have no idea how the republicans would react to that
Both candidates combined to spend 81 million on Facebook ads, while Hillary's campaign was spending 500,000 a day on overall advertising, yet people genuinely believe that a few hundred thousand dollars spent by Russians swayed the election.
Not Hillary being a horrible cunt embroiled in 35 years worth of scandals, rigging her own primary etc. Say what you will about Wikileaks, but the things I saw shared around most on social media by far were examples of her flipping positions on issues depending on what was popular at the time, Bill and his problems, examples of political corruption for profit, and her being paraded around like Weekend at Bernie's.