**OFFICIAL Donald J. Trump vs. Joseph (Joe) R. Biden Thread - 2020 Presidential Election**

DNC still has to be working 24/7 to come up with a better option than Biden. How can't they figure this shit out?

So you guys think the upper middle class white collar white man/women who punched Trump in 2016 is going to vote for him again?



I don't. Old people are turning on him too.

dems -275 to win the popular vote


Trump isn't winning michigan or pennsylvania


You think all the old people in Florida haven't been paying attn? How about all the old people in Arizona? You think they don't know they are being lied to 5x a day for 3.5 years by trump?



Dems polling even in texas. Enough said.


If biden somehow drops out it's def over for Trump.

Biden being senile and old af is the only thing saving trump.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by big dick

dems -275 to win the popular vote


Trump isn't winning michigan or pennsylvania


You think all the old people in Florida haven't been paying attn? How about all the old people in Arizona? You think they don't know they are being lied to 5x a day for 3.5 years by trump?



Dems polling even in texas. Enough said.


If biden somehow drops out it's def over for Trump.

Biden being senile and old af is the only thing saving trump.

---

Hey, our forum's ONLY stay at home Dad has a political opinion. Now get your ass back on the Facebook wife's page.

the toughest guys on high rise new construction were the union iron workers. BD was that guy

there was a heirarchy of trades and plumbing wasn’t it. Unless you were a sprinkler fitter. Iron not plastic pipe.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by nightmarefish

DNC still has to be working 24/7 to come up with a better option than Biden. How can't they figure this shit out?

---

That's what they said about the RNC in 2016.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Sanlmar

the toughest guys on high rise new construction were the union iron workers. BD was that guy

there was a heirarchy of trades and plumbing wasn’t it. Unless you were a sprinkler fitter. Iron not plastic pipe.

---

Nothing wrong with plumbers but there's certainly something wrong with bottomfeeder

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Sanlmar

the toughest guys on high rise new construction were the union iron workers. BD was that guy

there was a heirarchy of trades and plumbing wasn’t it. Unless you were a sprinkler fitter. Iron not plastic pipe.

---

I don't care what he did in his previous life. Right now he is a Facebook Mom and that is the way it is. He already stated many times he stays at home gambling while his wife works to get benefits. By all measures he is a gigantic pussy. Even his wife probably agrees with this post.

LOL big bird still in here talking about betting odds about an election? even after he blew his wife's retirement money on Hillary in 16? ROFL you can't make this up, blew the kids' college money on a "lock", lost everything, went back to grinding .50/1 and he's gonna do it all again in 2020 LOL

Tara Reade is a fat, ugly broad who is also full of shit.

Her "incident" in a public corridor 27 years ago probably never happened.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ju1ZFuvjzYc

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5HeZiKvOA0o

I've been thinking about this, and I think it's likely Biden is semi-innocent of this, but not completely innocent.

First off, Tara Reade is batshit crazy. That should be obvious by now. Nothing she says can really be trusted. She's already contradicted her past statements lots of times.

Note that even Tara Reade's ex-husband of 25 years ago seems to be afraid of her, and is refusing to comment upon those papers he filed in 1996. He even said that it was a difficult chapter in his life, and one he doesn't want to relive. He clearly doesn't want to say anything to set her off again.

Also, nobody else has accused Biden of sexual assault, in his long career. Inappropriate touching and general creepiness? Sure. We have seen it on video countless times. But it seems like it stops there. You'd think by now we'd have heard from women sexually assaulted by Biden (as we did with guys like Cosby and Weinstein), but we haven't.

However, we can't ignore some other facts:

- For 25 years, she has been telling people a story of being sexually harassed in Biden's office, including to her ex-husband.

- Her mom called Larry King in 1993 about the matter.

- Biden is acting very funny about finding and releasing records on her employment. He claims to be cooperating, but is stopping short of releasing everything, and it's very suspicious that he made an information request from the Senate which ended up getting rejected -- something he probably knew in advance.


My theory?

Something did happen in a hallway in 1993, but not what Reade is alleging. I'm guessing Biden was his usual creepy self, maybe grabbed her and was sniffing her hair and telling her how pretty she was, and she flipped out. She told her ex that she "struck a deal with the chief of staff" of Biden's office, as part of leaving her position. That part is probably true. She likely complained about Biden to his chief of staff, the person probably told her not to worry, and it was just Biden being Biden. Tara didn't accept this and kept pressing and was threatening all sorts of legal action, so they came to some kind of agreement where she was paid some hush money, and sent on her way.

If it really went down like this, I'm sure Biden remembers her and the incident. However, he probably doesn't want to admit to it, because it's hard to say, "Well yeah, I sniffed her hair and told her she was pretty, but I didn't put my fingers in her. She's making that last part up for dramatic effect."

It's one of these cases where the truth will make it more likely for people to believe the lies, so his advisers probably just told him to deny the whole thing, and to use the "it's been 27 years" excuse if the records of what really happened are unearthed.

He's probably also hoping that those records were lost (or never permanently stored) from all that time ago.

Anyway, her story just doesn't add up, but neither does Biden's denial and weird avoidance of getting records which could exonerate him. Truth has to be somewhere in between, which would be par for the course for Creepy Joe, who is known for being touchy and inappropriate, but not a rapist.

By the way, I actually DID mostly believe Christine Blasey-Ford, though I felt there wasn't enough conclusive evidence to deny Kavanaugh the nomination.

However, as more facts later came out, I ended up really doubting her story. This was because the greatest corroboration to her story came from college friend Leland Keyser, who later came forward to admit she was pressured into saying what Ford wanted her to say.

In September 2019, Keyser came forward to admit that she had been pressured by Ford's people to go along with the story, and was threatened that otherwise "things will come out" about Keyser's history of drug abuse. Keyser had some problems with Ford's version of the story, most notably the part that she would have just driven off and left Ford alone at the party with a bunch of drunken boys. She said she absolutely wouldn't have done that, given that she was Ford's ride, and that she had no memory of doing that to Ford or anyone. When Keyser questioned that part of the story, Ford refused to discuss it with her, and instead her people threatened Keyser to shut her mouth and go along with it, or she'd forever have the public reputation of a drug addict.

After some months passed, Keyser felt bad about corroborating a story she didn't really believe, came forward with her true opinion, and talked about the threats.

Keyser is a lifelong Democrat who would have no political motivation to protect Kavanaugh.

Anyway, that sealed the deal for me. Once you're threatening witnesses to corroborate your story the way you want, you lose credibility forever.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Dan Druff

By the way, I actually DID mostly believe Christine Blasey-Ford, though I felt there wasn't enough conclusive evidence to deny Kavanaugh the nomination.

However, as more facts later came out, I ended up really doubting her story. This was because the greatest corroboration to her story came from college friend Leland Keyser, who later came forward to admit she was pressured into saying what Ford wanted her to say.

In September 2019, Keyser came forward to admit that she had been pressured by Ford's people to go along with the story, and was threatened that otherwise "things will come out" about Keyser's history of drug abuse. Keyser had some problems with Ford's version of the story, most notably the part that she would have just driven off and left Ford alone at the party with a bunch of drunken boys. She said she absolutely wouldn't have done that, given that she was Ford's ride, and that she had no memory of doing that to Ford or anyone. When Keyser questioned that part of the story, Ford refused to discuss it with her, and instead her people threatened Keyser to shut her mouth and go along with it, or she'd forever have the public reputation of a drug addict.

After some months passed, Keyser felt bad about corroborating a story she didn't really believe, came forward with her true opinion, and talked about the threats.

Keyser is a lifelong Democrat who would have no political motivation to protect Kavanaugh.

Anyway, that sealed the deal for me. Once you're threatening witnesses to corroborate your story the way you want, you lose credibility forever.

---

People forget that Blasey-Ford made over a half million on her go-fund me page. People were actually dumb enough to believe her and actually donate their money to her, which she gladly accepted. It was a high tech rolling for sure.

it's comical yet sad that people give any credence to this.

1) just one year ago, reade said that joe didn't sexually assault her.

2) she's obviously crazy going by what we're learning of her now

3) the obama campaign vetted biden and had never even heard of this allegation

4) reade waited until now to say this. why didn't she say it when there were other democratic candidates running and another candidate could be selected? was the wound still too fresh then?

all of this suggests this is politically motivated

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Dan Druff

I've been thinking about this, and I think it's likely Biden is semi-innocent of this, but not completely innocent.

First off, Tara Reade is batshit crazy. That should be obvious by now. Nothing she says can really be trusted. She's already contradicted her past statements lots of times.

Note that even Tara Reade's ex-husband of 25 years ago seems to be afraid of her, and is refusing to comment upon those papers he filed in 1996. He even said that it was a difficult chapter in his life, and one he doesn't want to relive. He clearly doesn't want to say anything to set her off again.

Also, nobody else has accused Biden of sexual assault, in his long career. Inappropriate touching and general creepiness? Sure. We have seen it on video countless times. But it seems like it stops there. You'd think by now we'd have heard from women sexually assaulted by Biden (as we did with guys like Cosby and Weinstein), but we haven't.

However, we can't ignore some other facts:

- For 25 years, she has been telling people a story of being sexually harassed in Biden's office, including to her ex-husband.

- Her mom called Larry King in 1993 about the matter.

- Biden is acting very funny about finding and releasing records on her employment. He claims to be cooperating, but is stopping short of releasing everything, and it's very suspicious that he made an information request from the Senate which ended up getting rejected -- something he probably knew in advance.


My theory?

Something did happen in a hallway in 1993, but not what Reade is alleging. I'm guessing Biden was his usual creepy self, maybe grabbed her and was sniffing her hair and telling her how pretty she was, and she flipped out. She told her ex that she "struck a deal with the chief of staff" of Biden's office, as part of leaving her position. That part is probably true. She likely complained about Biden to his chief of staff, the person probably told her not to worry, and it was just Biden being Biden. Tara didn't accept this and kept pressing and was threatening all sorts of legal action, so they came to some kind of agreement where she was paid some hush money, and sent on her way.

If it really went down like this, I'm sure Biden remembers her and the incident. However, he probably doesn't want to admit to it, because it's hard to say, "Well yeah, I sniffed her hair and told her she was pretty, but I didn't put my fingers in her. She's making that last part up for dramatic effect."

It's one of these cases where the truth will make it more likely for people to believe the lies, so his advisers probably just told him to deny the whole thing, and to use the "it's been 27 years" excuse if the records of what really happened are unearthed.

He's probably also hoping that those records were lost (or never permanently stored) from all that time ago.

Anyway, her story just doesn't add up, but neither does Biden's denial and weird avoidance of getting records which could exonerate him. Truth has to be somewhere in between, which would be par for the course for Creepy Joe, who is known for being touchy and inappropriate, but not a rapist.

---

druff, if you think biden didn't assault her, but merely hit on her, that doesn't make him semi-innocent. that makes him fully innocent.

god, you "me too" movement people sicken me

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by blake

it's comical yet sad that people give any credence to this.

1) just one year ago, reade said that joe didn't sexually assault her.

2) she's obviously crazy going by what we're learning of her now

3) the obama campaign vetted biden and had never even heard of this allegation

4) reade waited until now to say this. why didn't she say it when there were other democratic candidates running and another candidate could be selected? was the wound still too fresh then?

all of this suggests this is politically motivated

---

we MUST believe ALL women

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by dwai

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by blake

it's comical yet sad that people give any credence to this.

1) just one year ago, reade said that joe didn't sexually assault her.

2) she's obviously crazy going by what we're learning of her now

3) the obama campaign vetted biden and had never even heard of this allegation

4) reade waited until now to say this. why didn't she say it when there were other democratic candidates running and another candidate could be selected? was the wound still too fresh then?

all of this suggests this is politically motivated

---

we MUST believe ALL women

---

god i hope we never ever hear that again

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by blake

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by dwai

we MUST believe ALL women

---

god i hope we never ever hear that again

---

Well, jimmyG, sonatine, sloppy Joe, and walter all said so during kavanaugh, I just assume we should believe this woman as well

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by blake

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Dan Druff

I've been thinking about this, and I think it's likely Biden is semi-innocent of this, but not completely innocent.

First off, Tara Reade is batshit crazy. That should be obvious by now. Nothing she says can really be trusted. She's already contradicted her past statements lots of times.

Note that even Tara Reade's ex-husband of 25 years ago seems to be afraid of her, and is refusing to comment upon those papers he filed in 1996. He even said that it was a difficult chapter in his life, and one he doesn't want to relive. He clearly doesn't want to say anything to set her off again.

Also, nobody else has accused Biden of sexual assault, in his long career. Inappropriate touching and general creepiness? Sure. We have seen it on video countless times. But it seems like it stops there. You'd think by now we'd have heard from women sexually assaulted by Biden (as we did with guys like Cosby and Weinstein), but we haven't.

However, we can't ignore some other facts:

- For 25 years, she has been telling people a story of being sexually harassed in Biden's office, including to her ex-husband.

- Her mom called Larry King in 1993 about the matter.

- Biden is acting very funny about finding and releasing records on her employment. He claims to be cooperating, but is stopping short of releasing everything, and it's very suspicious that he made an information request from the Senate which ended up getting rejected -- something he probably knew in advance.


My theory?

Something did happen in a hallway in 1993, but not what Reade is alleging. I'm guessing Biden was his usual creepy self, maybe grabbed her and was sniffing her hair and telling her how pretty she was, and she flipped out. She told her ex that she "struck a deal with the chief of staff" of Biden's office, as part of leaving her position. That part is probably true. She likely complained about Biden to his chief of staff, the person probably told her not to worry, and it was just Biden being Biden. Tara didn't accept this and kept pressing and was threatening all sorts of legal action, so they came to some kind of agreement where she was paid some hush money, and sent on her way.

If it really went down like this, I'm sure Biden remembers her and the incident. However, he probably doesn't want to admit to it, because it's hard to say, "Well yeah, I sniffed her hair and told her she was pretty, but I didn't put my fingers in her. She's making that last part up for dramatic effect."

It's one of these cases where the truth will make it more likely for people to believe the lies, so his advisers probably just told him to deny the whole thing, and to use the "it's been 27 years" excuse if the records of what really happened are unearthed.

He's probably also hoping that those records were lost (or never permanently stored) from all that time ago.

Anyway, her story just doesn't add up, but neither does Biden's denial and weird avoidance of getting records which could exonerate him. Truth has to be somewhere in between, which would be par for the course for Creepy Joe, who is known for being touchy and inappropriate, but not a rapist.

---

druff, if you think biden didn't assault her, but merely hit on her, that doesn't make him semi-innocent. that makes him fully innocent.

god, you "me too" movement people sicken me

---

Hitting on her is just saying, "Hey, you're hot, would you like to go out later?"

I imagine Biden probably engaged in some unwelcome touching and probably some sniffing, too.

Far cry from what Reade is alleging, and no big deal compared to what we've seen already on video of him much more recently.

But fully innocent would mean that he never touched her at all and she's completely fabricating everything. He likely did SOMETHING creepy to upset her so much back then.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Dan Druff

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by blake

druff, if you think biden didn't assault her, but merely hit on her, that doesn't make him semi-innocent. that makes him fully innocent.

god, you "me too" movement people sicken me

---

Hitting on her is just saying, "Hey, you're hot, would you like to go out later?"

I imagine Biden probably engaged in some unwelcome touching and probably some sniffing, too.

Far cry from what Reade is alleging, and no big deal compared to what we've seen already on video of him much more recently.

But fully innocent would mean that he never touched her at all and she's completely fabricating everything. He likely did SOMETHING creepy to upset her so much back then.

---

only doing something creepy makes him fully innocent of sexual assault.

jesus, you feminists are gross.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Dan Druff

I've been thinking about this, and I think it's likely Biden is semi-innocent of this, but not completely innocent..

---

You better hope she’s lying. Or at least that she couldn’t prove it, or have most believe her, because Trump can’t beat anyone else that would emerge.

Same with Dems making jokes about Trump’s valet. You better pray he stays healthy and doesn’t die from this shit.

Neither of these clowns could beat anyone who the other party handpicked atm in some weird convention shenanigans. I’m not sure of the protocol, or if there is even one. I’d assume they’re kind of free to choose whomever they want at the convention if something weird happened. It isn’t like the Dems trot out Bernie or the GOP runs out Pence. He’d obviously finish the term, but they wouldn’t run him if they had a choice.

If the Republicans picked Nikki Haley she’d kill Biden. She’s always played the game well. Isn’t viewed as always in lockstep with Trump. Hasn’t pissed his base off. Isn’t tainted by this virus or the economy issues. She’s pretty well-liked universally. Doesn’t have a thousand clips of silly statements to make ads out of.

Trump was a super heavy favorite on Thanksgiving imo, but now, there are way surer bets if you could just hand it to someone.

If the Dems could just hand the nom to someone, a Michelle Obama would kill Trump. A guy who forgets where he lives half the time is maybe a coin flip to slight fave against Trump right now

It feels weird too. Everything has a twilight zone vibe right now. Between these guys age and everything else, no matchup has ever felt less certain in May of an election year.

Predictit is sitting there with Biden at .79 to get nom with it already over.

We all assume most of us are going to get this virus at some point. These guys have way more interaction than a normal sheltered person. That 70-80 demographic is 8% to pass if you get it, but Trump is technically obese, Biden closer to 80 than 70. If you’d assume they both get it, which is a big assumption, but not crazy, it would be over 15% one would pass.

Then you add Biden being mid-stage dementia and nobody in love with our candidate, it doesn’t feel at all crazy that we could end up with a different matchup.

Clearly Trump isn’t getting replaced unless he got sick and died Biden has that possibility and just the fact he’s lost his marbles.

Right now the general is basically the political equivalent to mulva’s prison race detailed here,

https://pokerfraudalert.com/forum/sh...Pedophile+race

Anyone normal is going to jump in and beat the shit out of either if something weird happens and the party can handpick someone randomly who is actually a good candidate.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by blake

it's comical yet sad that people give any credence to this.

1) just one year ago, reade said that joe didn't sexually assault her.

2) she's obviously crazy going by what we're learning of her now

3) the obama campaign vetted biden and had never even heard of this allegation

4) reade waited until now to say this. why didn't she say it when there were other democratic candidates running and another candidate could be selected? was the wound still too fresh then?

all of this suggests this is politically motivated

---

I am fully willing to admit I was completely wrong in the Kavanaugh hearings. Tara Reade is a pioneer, she needs to be heard and more importantly believed. She is not making this up. I was wrong a year ago and right now.

There needs to be an investigation.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by BCR

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Dan Druff

I've been thinking about this, and I think it's likely Biden is semi-innocent of this, but not completely innocent..

---

You better hope she’s lying. Or at least that she couldn’t prove it, or have most believe her, because Trump can’t beat anyone else that would emerge.

Same with Dems making jokes about Trump’s valet. You better pray he stays healthy and doesn’t die from this shit.

Neither of these clowns could beat anyone who the other party handpicked atm in some weird convention shenanigans. I’m not sure of the protocol, or if there is even one. I’d assume they’re kind of free to choose whomever they want at the convention if something weird happened. It isn’t like the Dems trot out Bernie or the GOP runs out Pence. He’d obviously finish the term, but they wouldn’t run him if they had a choice.

If the Republicans picked Nikki Haley she’d kill Biden. She’s always played the game well. Isn’t viewed as always in lockstep with Trump. Hasn’t pissed his base off. Isn’t tainted by this virus or the economy issues. She’s pretty well-liked universally. Doesn’t have a thousand clips of silly statements to make ads out of.

Trump was a super heavy favorite on Thanksgiving imo, but now, there are way surer bets if you could just hand it to someone.

If the Dems could just hand the nom to someone, a Michelle Obama would kill Trump. A guy who forgets where he lives half the time is maybe a coin flip to slight fave against Trump right now

It feels weird too. Everything has a twilight zone vibe right now. Between these guys age and everything else, no matchup has ever felt less certain in May of an election year.

Predictit is sitting there with Biden at .79 to get nom with it already over.

We all assume most of us are going to get this virus at some point. These guys have way more interaction than a normal sheltered person. That 70-80 demographic is 8% to pass if you get it, but Trump is technically obese, Biden closer to 80 than 70. If you’d assume they both get it, which is a big assumption, but not crazy, it would be over 15% one would pass.

Then you add Biden being mid-stage dementia and nobody in love with our candidate, it doesn’t feel at all crazy that we could end up with a different matchup.

Clearly Trump isn’t getting replaced unless he got sick and died Biden has that possibility and just the fact he’s lost his marbles.

Right now the general is basically the political equivalent to mulva’s prison race detailed here,

https://pokerfraudalert.com/forum/sh...Pedophile+race

Anyone normal is going to jump in and beat the shit out of either if something weird happens and the party can handpick someone randomly who is actually a good candidate.

---

trump supporters, who are the best right wing propagandists, are out on nikki haley for the most part, she'd fail

Despite a relentless attack by the left wing media, this is where we are at:

Ohio: Trump vs. Biden
Emerson
Trump 46, Biden 43
Trump +3
Texas: Trump vs. Biden
Emerson
Trump 47, Biden 41
Trump +6
CNN
5/7 - 5/10
1001 RV
46*
51
-5

*Trump won with 46% of the vote in 2016.

I saw Joe Biden on GMA this morning. It's going to be a trainwreck come debate time in October.

Just think... At one time, Mitt Romney was chosen to lead the Republicans back into the White House. 3+ years into Trump’s presidency, and Romney is practically persona non grata among Republicans in Congress. I’m wondering, though, what Druff thinks about Romney’s said recently as reported in this vid segment.

https://youtu.be/z1IMM7mnYZ8

My list of political confessions continues to grow.

I was never a Romney fan. If he wasn’t from Mass I might have seen him differently.

Billionaire political candidate prolly was a turnoff. That ship sailed a long time ago. It’s like a prerequisite.


He looks really attractive now.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by blake

it's comical yet sad that people give any credence to this.

1) just one year ago, reade said that joe didn't sexually assault her.

2) she's obviously crazy going by what we're learning of her now

3) the obama campaign vetted biden and had never even heard of this allegation

4) reade waited until now to say this. why didn't she say it when there were other democratic candidates running and another candidate could be selected? was the wound still too fresh then?

all of this suggests this is politically motivated

---

Ya and maybe paid for by the DNC to disqualify Biden and get someone else in there. Would be a genius play IMO.

Fresh new poll:

President Trump Job Approval
The Hill/HarrisX
Approve 51, Disapprove 49
Approve +2

Wisconsin: Trump vs. Biden
Marquette
Biden 46, Trump 43
Biden +3

The 3 point Wisconsin lead is within the MOE which does not bode well for Joe. An article came out this morning about Biden's basement strategy, many Dems are thinking this is a losing strategy, especially if Trump starts increasing his travel and Joe is holed up in his basement.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by tgull

Fresh new poll:

President Trump Job Approval
The Hill/HarrisX
Approve 51, Disapprove 49
Approve +2

Wisconsin: Trump vs. Biden
Marquette
Biden 46, Trump 43
Biden +3

The 3 point Wisconsin lead is within the MOE which does not bode well for Joe. An article came out this morning about Biden's basement strategy, many Dems are thinking this is a losing strategy, especially if Trump starts increasing his travel and Joe is holed up in his basement.

---

you think a poll showing trump losing wisconsin, which he absolutely needs to win, is a good sign?

meanwhile, trump keeps doing his daily coronavirus briefings, which i pray he continues into november. he would be an absolute pussy if he bailed on those imo. he's doing great

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by blake

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by tgull

Fresh new poll:

President Trump Job Approval
The Hill/HarrisX
Approve 51, Disapprove 49
Approve +2

Wisconsin: Trump vs. Biden
Marquette
Biden 46, Trump 43
Biden +3

The 3 point Wisconsin lead is within the MOE which does not bode well for Joe. An article came out this morning about Biden's basement strategy, many Dems are thinking this is a losing strategy, especially if Trump starts increasing his travel and Joe is holed up in his basement.

---

you think a poll showing trump losing wisconsin, which he absolutely needs to win, is a good sign?

meanwhile, trump keeps doing his daily coronavirus briefings, which i pray he continues into november. he would be an absolute pussy if he bailed on those imo. he's doing great

---

Trump was 11 points down in Wisky in October 2016. Being basically even in May is not where Biden needs to be.

Issa #TRUMPSLIDE

Embedded Tweet

a cnn poll too. jesus.

stern calling on trump to resign is at least an interesting plot twist.

Is that even a real poll? Trump winning under 50 by 18 points and losing over 50? I’d love to see the method of that thing.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by BCR

Is that even a real poll? Trump winning under 50 by 18 points and losing over 50? I’d love to see the method of that thing.

---

Honestly, it's all going to come down to who will be willing to wait in line to vote. This notion of mail-in balloting by November is fantasy land. Really they should just cancel the election in all but ten or eleven states when you think about it. I mean why even have an election in Oregon or West Virginia when you think about it.

pa moved to mail in voting fyi

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by blake

pa moved to mail in voting fyi

---

I grew up outside of Philadelphia and they have been talking about vote by mail for years. It finally got approved last year after years of discussion and debates. If you think state X is going to approve this and get the technology ready to go before November I really don't know what to tell you. BTW, the characters at Disney world are not really giant mouses and ducks. They are humans dressing up in costumes just so you know.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by blake

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by tgull

Fresh new poll:

President Trump Job Approval
The Hill/HarrisX
Approve 51, Disapprove 49
Approve +2

Wisconsin: Trump vs. Biden
Marquette
Biden 46, Trump 43
Biden +3

The 3 point Wisconsin lead is within the MOE which does not bode well for Joe. An article came out this morning about Biden's basement strategy, many Dems are thinking this is a losing strategy, especially if Trump starts increasing his travel and Joe is holed up in his basement.

---

you think a poll showing trump losing wisconsin, which he absolutely needs to win, is a good sign?

meanwhile, trump keeps doing his daily coronavirus briefings, which i pray he continues into november. he would be an absolute pussy if he bailed on those imo. he's doing great

---

Just shows what an idiot bottomfairy is

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by tgull

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by blake

pa moved to mail in voting fyi

---

I grew up outside of Philadelphia and they have been talking about vote by mail for years. It finally got approved last year after years of discussion and debates. If you think state X is going to approve this and get the technology ready to go before November I really don't know what to tell you. BTW, the characters at Disney world are not really giant mouses and ducks. They are humans dressing up in costumes just so you know.

---

It can be prepared as long as the effort and funding are put into it.