Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 21 to 40 of 41

Thread: *** OFFICIAL *** Druff & Friends Show Thread for 02/13/2019 *** $150 FREEROLL

  1. #21
    Owner Dan Druff's Avatar
    Reputation
    10110
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    54,626
    Blog Entries
    2
    Load Metric
    65659802
    Quote Originally Posted by MrTickle View Post
    Is it over already?
    Server crashed during radio (2nd time this has happened, around the same time of night as last time, not sure why), then restarted, then my voice gave out.

    Editing show right now so it's all together in one neat package. When you hear it, you won't be able to tell it all occurred.

    Will be up shortly.

     
    Comments
      
      MumblesBadly: You did an excellent job editing out the server fail. Listened to arCHive and didn’t notice any.

  2. #22

  3. #23
    Silver jacosta24's Avatar
    Reputation
    166
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Posts
    746
    Blog Entries
    29
    Load Metric
    65659802
    Lol Druff no one cares about Joy Miller or your faggy arguments with her.

  4. #24
    NoFraud Poker Room Manager Belly Buster's Avatar
    Reputation
    1346
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    England
    Posts
    3,626
    Load Metric
    65659802
    Weekly donkament results. donken takes first place this week.

    Tournament=Radio Donkament
    Number=871
    BuyIn=0+0
    PrizeBonus=12000
    MultiplyBonus=No
    Entrants=40
    Late=18
    Tickets=0
    Removed=0
    Rebuys=0
    AddOns=0
    RebuyCost=0+0
    NetBonus=12000
    StopOnChop=No
    Start=2019-02-13 20:45:02
    Place40=TOTALLY_TINE (0)
    Place39=IamGreek (0)
    Place38=donkey (0)
    Place37=Landon_Mark (0)
    Place36=KitKat (0)
    Place35=MdwstHstlr (0)
    Place34=brutalthnkr (0)
    Place33=tradershky2 (0)
    Place32=duped (0)
    Place31=smiflorida (0)
    Place30=DiveBar_Dave (0)
    Place29=ltrainkoja (0)
    Place28=TheShrink (0)
    Place27=kushstrain2 (0)
    Place26=nolimitles (0)
    Place25=WillieStole (0)
    Place24=blubbernuffl (0)
    Place23=Ricky (0)
    Place22=d1sposition (0)
    Place21=polishtim (0)
    Place20=BobbyOrr (0)
    Place19=PainlessWon (0)
    Place18=Ikke1 (0)
    Place17=garrett (0)
    Place16=ballhawknet (0)
    Place15=ManaLeak101 (0)
    Place14=thaknuts (0)
    Place13=v12cl (0)
    Place12=snowtracks (0)
    Place11=sah_24 (0)
    Place10=cyberceo (0)
    Place9=Daniel72 (0)
    Place8=SamSnead (0)
    Place7=ByeDonk (0)
    Place6=PLOL (840)
    Place5=Gordman (960)
    Place4=m-u-l-v-a (1320)
    Place3=ownmatusow (1800)
    Place2=MudButt (2760)
    Place1=donken (4320)
    Stop=2019-02-13 22:46:32
    Quote Originally Posted by Dan Druff View Post
    BTW JACKDANIELS is the first one banned from the thread. He is accusing me of being "duped by a middle aged man who dresses like John Cena"
    #FREEJACK #NEVERFORGET

    NoFraud Online Poker Room: http://nofraud.pokerfraudalert.com:8087. For password resets and reload requests PM me.

  5. #25
    Gold MrTickle's Avatar
    Reputation
    429
    Join Date
    Feb 2015
    Location
    Moscow
    Posts
    1,721
    Load Metric
    65659802
    This show really had two segments where you justify your actions towards women on the internet?

     
    Comments
      
      sah_24: Libtards, yes they are actually this fucking dumb

  6. #26
    Gold handicapme's Avatar
    Reputation
    361
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    2,182
    Load Metric
    65659802
    Quote Originally Posted by MrTickle View Post
    This show really had two segments where you justify your actions towards women on the internet?
    You are the literal definition of a liberal cuck.
    "I GOT NO TOE"

    #FreeFluffler #FreeThisGuyIsCreepy #lockupGarrett

  7. #27
    Gold MrTickle's Avatar
    Reputation
    429
    Join Date
    Feb 2015
    Location
    Moscow
    Posts
    1,721
    Load Metric
    65659802
    Quote Originally Posted by handicapme View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by MrTickle View Post
    This show really had two segments where you justify your actions towards women on the internet?
    You are the literal definition of a liberal cuck.
    I’m not a liberal

     
    Comments
      
      sah_24: LOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOL

  8. #28
    Gold Salty_Aus's Avatar
    Reputation
    283
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Gold Coast, QLD, Australia
    Posts
    1,691
    Load Metric
    65659802
    If she's the type to make sexual harassment allegations over the cleavage thing.
    She's likely the type to commence both a libel and slander suit... probably has grounds too.

  9. #29
    Owner Dan Druff's Avatar
    Reputation
    10110
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    54,626
    Blog Entries
    2
    Load Metric
    65659802
    Quote Originally Posted by Salty_Aus View Post
    If she's the type to make sexual harassment allegations over the cleavage thing.
    She's likely the type to commence both a libel and slander suit... probably has grounds too.
    Libel and slander will only work if I said things which were untrue.

    Do you think I lied about anything?

    If necessary, I could bring in a slew of witnesses to back my various stories.

    Furthermore, the pics she distributed herself of guys putting their face in her cleavage (plus the infamous Todd Brunson humping GIF) would be enough to prove the legitimacy of the promiscuity claims (or at least why a reasonable person would make such an assumption). Oh, and she also took part in an interview where she bragged about sleeping with men to get stories (before her time in poker).

    If she even dared try to sue me, I could easily smack her down in court AND beat her with an anti-SLAPP motion, and she'd owe ME tens of thousands of dollars. So I don't think she would try this.

    FYI, she didn't get any lawyers involved with the sexual harassment thing. She simply disliked Nick, and took advantage of a joke he made while testing the camera when he said, "... and here's a shot of Joy's cleavage..."

    So she took the complaint to her bosses, who fired Nick, because technically that's sexual harassment (even though he felt comfortable doing it because of her overt sexuality she constantly talked about and displayed).

    Anyway, I'm curious which statements I made which you think were untrue or unprovable?

  10. #30
    Gold SysOp's Avatar
    Reputation
    266
    Join Date
    Dec 2014
    Location
    Detroit
    Posts
    1,118
    Load Metric
    65659802
    Quote Originally Posted by Salty_Aus View Post
    If she's the type to make sexual harassment allegations over the cleavage thing.
    She's likely the type to commence both a libel and slander suit... probably has grounds too.
    LOL @ slander or libel. Everything he said was true.

    However it did not need an hour long segment on radio. Or even a topic at all. Stop living in the past man, it's over and it'll never be like it was.

  11. #31
    Platinum FRANKRIZZO's Avatar
    Reputation
    482
    Join Date
    Sep 2014
    Posts
    3,393
    Load Metric
    65659802
    Quote Originally Posted by Dan Druff View Post
    Show begins at approximately 8:15pm PST, on Wednesday, February 13, 2019.


    You can listen by going to our Radio tab above, or clicking here: http://pokerfraudalert.com/forum/radio.php

    "Call To Listen Line": Call (605) 313-0736 to listen to the show from ANY PHONE in the world! No smartphone or app required! If you do have a smartphone, this will NOT cost you any data.

    Call in number: (775) FRAUD-55 or (775) 372-8355. Make sure to show your caller ID, or the phone system will not let you through (you will probably get a busy signal)! You can also call our mountaintop number (an old '70s phone sitting on top of Mt. Charleston) at (702) 430-1808.

    You can also text Druff at any time before, during, or after the show, at (775) 372-8355 (our main phone number).

    You can follow along and interact with us in our live chat room, by clicking the Chat tab near the top of the screen. You need to be logged in and have flash capability on your computer to see the chat.

    There is a $150 freeroll tonight!









    Freeroll info
    Tournament Location: NoFraud Online Poker Room
    Tournament Date/Time: 8:45pm PDT on 2/13/19
    Tournament Type: NL Holdem
    Tournament Buyin: FREE - it doesn't even cost you any play chips!
    Tournament Prizes: 1st: $75, 2nd: $40, 3rd: 20, 4th: $15 . I will send this to you by bank transfer, bitcoin, or "other" methods. PM me after you win to claim your prize.

    The following generous donations were received for this freeroll:
    Eric Bensamochan $150

    There is no tournament password. Go register now! There is now late registration allowed until 25 minutes after start time.


    *** IMPORTANT ***

    You must read the rules for the freeroll, as not everyone qualifies for the free money!

    Freeroll rules can be found here: http://pokerfraudalert.com/freeroll




    Agenda for today:

    - Federal court grants Borgata the ability to move search for Phil Ivey's assets in Nevada, in order to collect $10.6 million judgment (segment features attorney Eric Bensamochan)

    - Druff gets into Twitter argument with Penn Jillette's wife, and disgraced former poker media figure Joy Miller sticks her head into the matter

    - Joseph Stiers, an advantage player barred from Caesars properties, settles lawsuit over his disqualification from WSOP Main with a lot of chips

    - Founder of large Canadian cryptocurrency exchange supposedly dies, $180m of bitcoin become inaccessible

    - Bryn Kenney buys tournament win despite being last in chips

    - Weird turn in Eli Elezra/Abe Mosseri story makes Mosseri seem less symathetic

    - Superbowl National Anthem bet controversy leaves some bettors, sportsbooks unhappy

    - Pokerstars upsets people with large reduction in points for tournament players

    - Ocean Resort in Atlantic City changes ownership again, continues property's streak of failure

    - Facebook in-app purchase scandal from 2012-2016, targeting minors, just coming to light now

    - Editorial: Where is the line drawn between criticism/commentary and cyberbullying?

    - Please suggest other good topics if you don't see them here!

    - We take your phone calls at (775) FRAUD-55 or (775) 372-8355
    Druff defo got that bitch joy miller fired with the final peg , funny how everyone jumped on band wagon . I really enjoyed the first 2 1/2 hours gave joy such a good flogging .
    Last edited by FRANKRIZZO; 02-16-2019 at 01:35 PM.

  12. #32
    Gold Salty_Aus's Avatar
    Reputation
    283
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Gold Coast, QLD, Australia
    Posts
    1,691
    Load Metric
    65659802
    Quote Originally Posted by Dan Druff View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Salty_Aus View Post
    If she's the type to make sexual harassment allegations over the cleavage thing.
    She's likely the type to commence both a libel and slander suit... probably has grounds too.
    Libel and slander will only work if I said things which were untrue.

    Do you think I lied about anything?

    If necessary, I could bring in a slew of witnesses to back my various stories.

    Furthermore, the pics she distributed herself of guys putting their face in her cleavage (plus the infamous Todd Brunson humping GIF) would be enough to prove the legitimacy of the promiscuity claims (or at least why a reasonable person would make such an assumption). Oh, and she also took part in an interview where she bragged about sleeping with men to get stories (before her time in poker).

    If she even dared try to sue me, I could easily smack her down in court AND beat her with an anti-SLAPP motion, and she'd owe ME tens of thousands of dollars. So I don't think she would try this.

    FYI, she didn't get any lawyers involved with the sexual harassment thing. She simply disliked Nick, and took advantage of a joke he made while testing the camera when he said, "... and here's a shot of Joy's cleavage..."

    So she took the complaint to her bosses, who fired Nick, because technically that's sexual harassment (even though he felt comfortable doing it because of her overt sexuality she constantly talked about and displayed).

    Anyway, I'm curious which statements I made which you think were untrue or unprovable?
    Virtually everything you've presented is hearsay, and you stepped over the line and insuated many things. An example of your insulations is she's an ugly slut who slept with everyone, and this in your opinion is why she behaved like you perceived... you made numerous insinuations.
    This example you said many times and saying "she's like that girl" might not save you.

    If I was your friend and you went on a twitter rant over something like this, year's after it happened. I doubt I'd be happy to be involved, make a legal statement or testify. *shrugs* Micon would probably side with Joy just to piss you off.

    If she brings action the onus is on you to prove it's true. Might be true but can you prove it?
    A good lawyer is often more important then the truth. How would you justify your prank call?

    I should sue you. Over an hour on radio to bring us all up to date on this twitter argument deserves some sort of compensation on my part.... yes that was a joke.

    Even your drunken guest could be considered prejudicial, and a smart lawyer might be able to argue that was your intention.
    I could say a lot more but it's just not worth my time or effort, arguing with you over this is something I'd prefer to avoid.

  13. #33
    Platinum FRANKRIZZO's Avatar
    Reputation
    482
    Join Date
    Sep 2014
    Posts
    3,393
    Load Metric
    65659802


    Never fuck Druff over.

  14. #34
    Owner Dan Druff's Avatar
    Reputation
    10110
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    54,626
    Blog Entries
    2
    Load Metric
    65659802
    Quote Originally Posted by Salty_Aus View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Dan Druff View Post

    Libel and slander will only work if I said things which were untrue.

    Do you think I lied about anything?

    If necessary, I could bring in a slew of witnesses to back my various stories.

    Furthermore, the pics she distributed herself of guys putting their face in her cleavage (plus the infamous Todd Brunson humping GIF) would be enough to prove the legitimacy of the promiscuity claims (or at least why a reasonable person would make such an assumption). Oh, and she also took part in an interview where she bragged about sleeping with men to get stories (before her time in poker).

    If she even dared try to sue me, I could easily smack her down in court AND beat her with an anti-SLAPP motion, and she'd owe ME tens of thousands of dollars. So I don't think she would try this.

    FYI, she didn't get any lawyers involved with the sexual harassment thing. She simply disliked Nick, and took advantage of a joke he made while testing the camera when he said, "... and here's a shot of Joy's cleavage..."

    So she took the complaint to her bosses, who fired Nick, because technically that's sexual harassment (even though he felt comfortable doing it because of her overt sexuality she constantly talked about and displayed).

    Anyway, I'm curious which statements I made which you think were untrue or unprovable?
    Virtually everything you've presented is hearsay, and you stepped over the line and insuated many things. An example of your insulations is she's an ugly slut who slept with everyone, and this in your opinion is why she behaved like you perceived... you made numerous insinuations.
    This example you said many times and saying "she's like that girl" might not save you.

    If I was your friend and you went on a twitter rant over something like this, year's after it happened. I doubt I'd be happy to be involved, make a legal statement or testify. *shrugs* Micon would probably side with Joy just to piss you off.

    If she brings action the onus is on you to prove it's true. Might be true but can you prove it?
    A good lawyer is often more important then the truth. How would you justify your prank call?

    I should sue you. Over an hour on radio to bring us all up to date on this twitter argument deserves some sort of compensation on my part.... yes that was a joke.

    Even your drunken guest could be considered prejudicial, and a smart lawyer might be able to argue that was your intention.
    I could say a lot more but it's just not worth my time or effort, arguing with you over this is something I'd prefer to avoid.
    I don't want a protracted debate about this either.

    However, you're incorrect.

    There were 3 basic parts to my segment:

    1) The general description that I find her ugly and that she slept around. The ugly part is subjective and doesn't require proof. It's my opinion. The sleeping around thing would be easily proven by an old interview she did where she bragged about it (among other things).

    2) My stories from 2007 & 2009 regarding Terrence Chan and my ESPN color commentator situation. Both had numerous witnesses who could corroborate.

    3) Our recent Twitter interactions. This was just an argument. In fact, the only one lying was her (claiming I blocked her when it was the other way around.) She also attacked me first.

    Finally, she'd have to show damages. "Todd hurt my feelings because he said I was a slut and a vindictive person" won't cut it, especially since our recent interactions were a result of her attacking me first.


    I'm not concerned.

  15. #35
    Platinum FRANKRIZZO's Avatar
    Reputation
    482
    Join Date
    Sep 2014
    Posts
    3,393
    Load Metric
    65659802
    Judge Judy face off. She requests 5k for pain and suffering druff counter suit ?

     
    Comments
      
      splitthis: Lol
      
      MumblesBadly: I pay money to see such an episode!

  16. #36
    Owner Dan Druff's Avatar
    Reputation
    10110
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    54,626
    Blog Entries
    2
    Load Metric
    65659802
    Surprisingly there were very few comments complaining about badguy's drunkenness.

    I was sure I was going to get a ton of angry texts about it, but I only got two, and I actually got more from people who enjoyed his drunk behavior.

    So that's good. I think.

     
    Comments
      
      SysOp: badguy wasn't bad, takes a lot of courage to co-host
      
      Baron Von Strucker: bad guy is a package deal of awesomeness
      
      MumblesBadly: He helps balance the demographics given that you and T-ski don’t imbibe while doing the show.

  17. #37
    One Percenter Pooh's Avatar
    Reputation
    1375
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    5,738
    Load Metric
    65659802
    It's because drunk badguy isn't an angry badguy. The end sequence with badguy slurring badly was so terrible it was good. Garrett is aids though.

    Badguy should get a nuthugger of the day award though.

     
    Comments
      
      Baron Von Strucker: bad guy is god

  18. #38
    aka PP23 badguy23's Avatar
    Reputation
    673
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Posts
    6,064
    Load Metric
    65659802
    Quote Originally Posted by Dan Druff View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by MrTickle View Post
    Is it over already?
    Server crashed during radio (2nd time this has happened, around the same time of night as last time, not sure why), then restarted, then my voice gave out.

    Editing show right now so it's all together in one neat package. When you hear it, you won't be able to tell it all occurred.

    Will be up shortly.

    LOL But I was OK enough to let you no that? U were just talking to traderusky and I??

    Snap that off clean lol.

  19. #39
    aka PP23 badguy23's Avatar
    Reputation
    673
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Posts
    6,064
    Load Metric
    65659802
    Quote Originally Posted by Pooh View Post
    It's because drunk badguy isn't an angry badguy. The end sequence with badguy slurring badly was so terrible it was good. Garrett is aids though.

    Badguy should get a nuthugger of the day award though.
    Yea I told a little white lie at the start of the show. I was done with a fifth of vodka before I got skype set up.


    I def was angry and had a agenda before the show. I just thought better of it. Maybe another time.

    I respect Druff then Eric BeenSmoking is talking about all these legal things and I'm now finishing off my 2nd 5th trying not to act drunk lol.

    Didn't work!!

    I def beat the over under to be snapped off. Garrett I didnt set u up BTW I was drunker then you bro.

    Thanks for letting me host Druff, but we all no it's not Badguy unless he got a couple of pops in him.

  20. #40
    100% Organic MumblesBadly's Avatar
    Reputation
    94
    Join Date
    Jun 2015
    Location
    In the many threads of this forum
    Posts
    9,408
    Load Metric
    65659802
    Quote Originally Posted by badguy23 View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Pooh View Post
    It's because drunk badguy isn't an angry badguy. The end sequence with badguy slurring badly was so terrible it was good. Garrett is aids though.

    Badguy should get a nuthugger of the day award though.
    Yea I told a little white lie at the start of the show. I was done with a fifth of vodka before I got skype set up.


    I def was angry and had a agenda before the show. I just thought better of it. Maybe another time.

    I respect Druff then Eric BeenSmoking is talking about all these legal things and I'm now finishing off my 2nd 5th trying not to act drunk lol.

    Didn't work!!

    I def beat the over under to be snapped off. Garrett I didnt set u up BTW I was drunker then you bro.

    Thanks for letting me host Druff, but we all no it's not Badguy unless he got a couple of pops in him.
    Druff expecting you not to drink when cohosting the show is like asking you not to breathe! Amirite?
    _____________________________________________
    Quote Originally Posted by Dan Druff View Post
    I actually hope this [second impeachment] succeeds, because I want Trump put down politically like a sick, 14-year-old dog. ... I don't want him complicating the 2024 primary season. I just want him done.
    Quote Originally Posted by Dan Druff View Post
    Were Republicans cowardly or unethical not to go along with [convicting Trump in the second impeachment Senate trial]? No. The smart move was to reject it.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 17
    Last Post: 01-31-2019, 04:29 PM
  2. Replies: 23
    Last Post: 01-28-2019, 03:23 PM
  3. Replies: 13
    Last Post: 01-22-2019, 02:39 PM
  4. Replies: 22
    Last Post: 01-15-2019, 03:07 PM
  5. Replies: 51
    Last Post: 02-21-2018, 06:08 PM