Quote Originally Posted by gimmick View Post
Quote Originally Posted by Dan Druff View Post

It's not entitlement. I'm entitled to nothing regarding corporations I don't have dealings with.

"Spineless" is exactly what the word means. It means a fear of standing up for any principles, and always taking the perceived path of least resistance. Being spineless doesn't necessarily mean being more profitable. As I said, Chik-Fil-A and Goya are examples of corporations which stood for their principles, and gained more right wing business than they lost left wing business, thus a net positive. So it was win-win. It was a risk, but it was win-win.

But again, you can keep moving the goalposts and redefining what I mean by "cancel culture", but that doesn't change the clear and obvious point I'm making.

This is not about the corporate response to cancel culture. It's about cancel culture itself which is now causing corporations to react this way.

Read that 10 times until you understand it.
So standing up to reprint picture books of funny looking gooks is a principle now? Ok. Clear and obvious.
Standing up against the woke mob and not feeling pressured to ban your own beloved classic children's books is important, yes.

If you can't understand that, I don't know what to tell you.