Originally Posted by
MumblesBadly
So you are implying that mail-in voting in the 5 states that have had universal mail-in voting before this year — Washington, Oregon, Hawaii, Utah, and Colorado — has allowed rampant undetected voter fraud??? And you do so without a shred of evidence of such voting fraud and contrary to the data collected by The Heritage Foundation??? Wow! You are so fair and unbiased!!!
https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/...us-states.html
Yes, I am indeed claiming that any state with universal mail-in voting either had a problem with fraud or rejected legitimate votes. Both situations are terrible.
These didn't likely affect any Presidential election, because the only swing state of those four was Colorado, but it has gone blue enough to where any fraud/undercount isn't likely to have affected it.
Your "studies" are meaningless, if they cannot detect the undetectable. Which they can't.
I don't see why that's such a tough concept to grasp.
For example, I could commission a study on how often Mumbles jerks during 2019 in his truck when parked off of freeway exits. Unless Mumbles himself owned up to it, there would be no way to study this. Such a study would find "no evidence" that Mumbles choked the chicken in his truck, but that would be meaningless, as no evidence of this would be available, even if he had. Thus, such a study would be worthless.
Same thing here.
I hope you understand now.
Reply With Quote